Zum Hauptinhalt springen
xMedica

NCT06942949ClinicalTrials.gov

Evaluation of Enhanced Lithotripsy System (ELS) in the Treatment of Urinary Stones, A Pivotal Trial

RekrutiertNimmt laut Registereintrag derzeit Teilnehmende auf.
Diese Studie kontaktieren

Kurz gefasst

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the ELS to treat urinary stones. The ELS is intended to break urinary stones into small fragments that can pass during or after the procedure with less…

Interventionell101 Teilnehmende gesucht20 Studienzentren1 Land

Kategorien

In 1 Register registriert

Eine Studie kann in mehreren Registern registriert sein. Wir zeigen sie einmal und verlinken jeden Eintrag, den wir haben.

Die Studieninformationen werden so angezeigt, wie sie vom Register veröffentlicht wurden, in ihrer Originalsprache.

Interesse an dieser Studie?

Anmelden oder ein Konto erstellen um Ihr Interesse zu bekunden und diese Studie zu verfolgen.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2025-04-24; recorded start 2025-05-01
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Not stated: Participants are not randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as non-randomised
  • Not stated: A comparison group is not stated in the registry recordThe record describes a single study arm
  • Not stated: Open label (no blinding)Masking is recorded as none (open label)
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Not stated: No other studies from this sponsor are in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Avvio Medical)
  • Not stated: No posted results from this sponsor are in this database yetBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 1 condition.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourEXPLORATORY

An exploratory-stage design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation0/20

    Allocation not stated in the record

  • Blinding0/20

    Open-label

  • Control arm0/15

    No comparator arm stated in the record

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type3/10

    Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 20 sites

  • Data monitoring committee0/7

    No data monitoring committee stated

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleSMALL

A small study: 101 participants (target), run at 20 sites.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment18/40

    101 participants (target)

  • Site count15/25

    20 sites

  • Country count0/15

    Single country

  • Planned duration6/10

    Planned over about 16 months

  • Sponsor scale0/10

    Avvio Medical has led 1 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Zusammenfassung

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the ELS to treat urinary stones. The ELS is intended to break urinary stones into small fragments that can pass during or after the procedure with less or no discomfort. Eligible patients are male or females, age 21 or older, with a single urinary stone in the ureter. Participants will undergo the ELS procedure and then be evaluated 30 days later for the presence or absence of urinary stone fragments on a CT scan. Subjects who still have stone present at Day 30 will be evaluated again at Day 60. Other outcome measures will be changes in pain, quality of life, and return to normal daily activities/work.

Erkrankungen

  • Kidney Calculi; Ureteral Calculi

Eignung

Eignung
GeschlechtAlle
Alter21 YearsKein Höchstalter
Gesunde FreiwilligeNein

Eignung im Wortlaut des Registers

Inclusion Criteria: * Male or Female aged \>=21 Years * Provides written informed consent * One urinary stone within the ureter, size \>=5 mm and \<=10 mm present on CT * Stone is indicated for Shock Wavve Lithotrips Per AUA 2026 guidelines * Stone to be treated has a maximum density of \<= 1200 HU Exclusion Criteria: * Anatomic presentations that would preclude obtaining an acoustic window for the ultrasound treatment * Non-calcium based stones (e.g., uric acid stones) * Untreated UTI * Presence of abnormal skin conditions in the area to be treated * Coagulation abnormality * Inability to lay still for 30 minutes * Pregnant * Abnormal Kidney Function * Any genitourinary history or procedure that has altered anatomy (e.g. urinary tract reconstruction)

Eignung in einfachen Aussagen

Die Kriterien dieses Eintrags wurden noch nicht in einzelne Aussagen aufgeschlüsselt. Der Registertext oben ist vollständig und ist die maßgebliche Fassung.

Studiendesign

Studiendesign
StudientypInterventionell
PhaseNicht zutreffend
ZuteilungNicht zutreffend
InterventionsmodellSINGLE_GROUP
Primäres ZielTREATMENT
VerblindungNONE (0)
Teilnahme101 Teilnehmende gesucht

Sponsor und Mitwirkende

  • Avvio Medical Sponsor

Studienarme und Interventionen

  • The ELS Trial is a prospective, multi-center, single arm study.EXPERIMENTAL

    All Subjects who qualify to participate in the ELS Trial will receive the experimental ELS procedure.

Interventionen

  • Medizinprodukt ELS (Enhanced Lithotripsy System)

    ELS (Enhanced Lithotripsy System) utilizes low pressure ultrasound to actuate proprietary microbubbles administered into the urine to pit and fragment urinary stones.

Endpunkte

  1. Primärer Endpunkt

    Primary Outcome Measure

    CT assessment of the target stone demonstrating either (i) stone free status (zero fragments) or (ii) the presence of only stone fragments small enough to pass spontaneously (\<=4 mm) at 30 Days post procedure.

    Zeitrahmen From ELS treatment to 30 Days afterward.

Daten

Daten
Startdatum1. Mai 2025 (tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss1. August 2026 (geschätzt)
Abschluss1. September 2026 (geschätzt)
Erstveröffentlichung24. April 2025 (tatsächlich)
Zuletzt aktualisiert16. Juni 2026
Ergebnisse veröffentlichtIm Registereintrag nicht angegeben
Status zuletzt bestätigtJuli 2025

Tatsächlich bedeutet, dass das Ereignis eingetreten ist. Geschätzt bedeutet, dass der Sponsor es erwartet. Die beiden bedeuten Unterschiedliches.

Standorte

12 Studienzentren rekrutieren

United States

United States
EinrichtungStadtBundesland oder RegionStatus
Michael G. Oefelein Clinical TrialsBakersfieldCaliforniaAktiv, rekrutiert nicht
University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleVirginiaZurückgezogen
University of Virginia Community HealthCulpeperVirginiaAktiv, rekrutiert nicht
DukeDurhamNorth CarolinaAktiv, rekrutiert nicht
San Diego Clinical TrialsLa MesaCaliforniaRekrutiert
Comprehensive Urologic CareLake BarringtonIllinoisRekrutiert
Nebraska UrologyLincolnNebraskaNicht angegeben
Arkansas Urology Research CenterLittle RockArkansasNicht angegeben
University of Miami HospitalMiamiFloridaRekrutiert
Arizona State Urological Research InstitutePhoenixArizonaRekrutiert
Urology NevadaRenoNevadaNicht angegeben
University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkRekrutiert
Georgia UrologyRoswellGeorgiaRekrutiert
Golden State UrologySacramentoCaliforniaRekrutiert
Urology San AntonioSan AntonioTexasRekrutiert
Urology Specialists ClinicSioux CitySouth DakotaNicht angegeben
SUNY - Upstate Medical UniversitySyracuseNew YorkRekrutiert
Urology of VirginiaVirginia BeachVirginiaRekrutiert
Wichita Urology GroupWichitaKansasRekrutiert
Minnesota UrologyWoodburyMinnesotaRekrutiert

Studiendokumente

In diesem Registereintrag sind keine Dokumente verlinkt.

Änderungen im Zeitverlauf

Seit wir diesen Eintrag erstmals eingelesen haben, wurden keine Änderungen erfasst.

Eine Änderung wird jedes Mal erfasst, wenn der Sponsor den Registereintrag aktualisiert. Status, Daten, Teilnahme und Studienzentren erscheinen hier, sobald sie sich ändern.