NCT06942949ClinicalTrials.gov
Evaluation of Enhanced Lithotripsy System (ELS) in the Treatment of Urinary Stones, A Pivotal Trial
En resumen
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the ELS to treat urinary stones. The ELS is intended to break urinary stones into small fragments that can pass during or after the procedure with less…
De intervención101 participantes buscados20 centros1 país
Categorías
Registrado en 1 registro
- ClinicalTrials.govNCT06942949Abrir este registro en ClinicalTrials.govSincronizado hace 2 meses
Un mismo estudio puede estar registrado en varios registros. Lo mostramos una sola vez y enlazamos con todos los registros que tenemos.
La información del ensayo se muestra tal como la publicó el registro, en su idioma original.
¿Le interesa este estudio?
Iniciar sesión o cree una cuenta para registrar su interés y seguir este estudio.
How this study is set up
The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.
- Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2025-04-24; recorded start 2025-05-01
- Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
- Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
- Not stated: Participants are not randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as non-randomised
- Not stated: A comparison group is not stated in the registry recordThe record describes a single study arm
- Not stated: Open label (no blinding)Masking is recorded as none (open label)
- Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
- Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
- Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
- Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
- Not stated: No other studies from this sponsor are in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Avvio Medical)
- Not stated: No posted results from this sponsor are in this database yetBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
- The record lists 1 condition.
- Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
Trial stature
Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.
An exploratory-stage design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.
How this score is built
- Randomised allocation0/20
Allocation not stated in the record
- Blinding0/20
Open-label
- Control arm0/15
No comparator arm stated in the record
- Primary-outcome specificity10/10
Named primary outcome with a defined time frame
- Endpoint type3/10
Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)
- Multi-centre8/8
Multi-centre: 20 sites
- Data monitoring committee0/7
No data monitoring committee stated
- Prospective registration5/5
Registered before the study start date
- Protocol / SAP posted0/5
No protocol or SAP posted to the registry
A small study: 101 participants (target), run at 20 sites.
How this score is built
- Enrolment18/40
101 participants (target)
- Site count15/25
20 sites
- Country count0/15
Single country
- Planned duration6/10
Planned over about 16 months
- Sponsor scale0/10
Avvio Medical has led 1 trials in our corpus
We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.
How this score is built
- Investigator standing0/100
No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial
These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.
Resumen
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the ELS to treat urinary stones. The ELS is intended to break urinary stones into small fragments that can pass during or after the procedure with less or no discomfort. Eligible patients are male or females, age 21 or older, with a single urinary stone in the ureter. Participants will undergo the ELS procedure and then be evaluated 30 days later for the presence or absence of urinary stone fragments on a CT scan. Subjects who still have stone present at Day 30 will be evaluated again at Day 60. Other outcome measures will be changes in pain, quality of life, and return to normal daily activities/work.
Afecciones
- Kidney Calculi; Ureteral Calculi
Elegibilidad
| Sexo | Todos |
|---|---|
| Edades | 21 Years – Sin máximo |
| Voluntarios sanos | No |
Elegibilidad tal como figura en el registro
Elegibilidad en frases sencillas
Los criterios de este registro aún no se han desglosado en frases separadas. El texto del registro anterior está completo y es la versión autorizada.
Diseño del estudio
| Tipo de estudio | De intervención |
|---|---|
| Fase | No aplicable |
| Asignación | No aplicable |
| Modelo de intervención | SINGLE_GROUP |
| Propósito principal | TREATMENT |
| Enmascaramiento | NONE (0) |
| Inscripción | 101 participantes buscados |
Patrocinador y colaboradores
- Avvio Medical Patrocinador
Grupos e intervenciones
- The ELS Trial is a prospective, multi-center, single arm study.EXPERIMENTAL
All Subjects who qualify to participate in the ELS Trial will receive the experimental ELS procedure.
Intervenciones
- Dispositivo ELS (Enhanced Lithotripsy System)
ELS (Enhanced Lithotripsy System) utilizes low pressure ultrasound to actuate proprietary microbubbles administered into the urine to pit and fragment urinary stones.
Variables de resultado
Variable de resultado principal
Primary Outcome Measure
CT assessment of the target stone demonstrating either (i) stone free status (zero fragments) or (ii) the presence of only stone fragments small enough to pass spontaneously (\<=4 mm) at 30 Days post procedure.
Plazo From ELS treatment to 30 Days afterward.
Fechas
| Fecha de inicio | 1 de mayo de 2025 (real) |
|---|---|
| Finalización principal | 1 de agosto de 2026 (estimada) |
| Finalización | 1 de septiembre de 2026 (estimada) |
| Primera publicación | 24 de abril de 2025 (real) |
| Última actualización | 16 de junio de 2026 |
| Resultados publicados | No indicado en el registro |
| Estado verificado por última vez | julio de 2025 |
Real significa que el evento ocurrió. Estimada significa que el patrocinador lo prevé. Ambas cosas significan algo distinto.
Ubicaciones
12 centros están en reclutamiento
United States
| Centro | Ciudad | Estado o región | Estado |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael G. Oefelein Clinical Trials | Bakersfield | California | Activo, sin reclutar |
| University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | Retirado |
| University of Virginia Community Health | Culpeper | Virginia | Activo, sin reclutar |
| Duke | Durham | North Carolina | Activo, sin reclutar |
| San Diego Clinical Trials | La Mesa | California | En reclutamiento |
| Comprehensive Urologic Care | Lake Barrington | Illinois | En reclutamiento |
| Nebraska Urology | Lincoln | Nebraska | No indicado |
| Arkansas Urology Research Center | Little Rock | Arkansas | No indicado |
| University of Miami Hospital | Miami | Florida | En reclutamiento |
| Arizona State Urological Research Institute | Phoenix | Arizona | En reclutamiento |
| Urology Nevada | Reno | Nevada | No indicado |
| University of Rochester Medical Center | Rochester | New York | En reclutamiento |
| Georgia Urology | Roswell | Georgia | En reclutamiento |
| Golden State Urology | Sacramento | California | En reclutamiento |
| Urology San Antonio | San Antonio | Texas | En reclutamiento |
| Urology Specialists Clinic | Sioux City | South Dakota | No indicado |
| SUNY - Upstate Medical University | Syracuse | New York | En reclutamiento |
| Urology of Virginia | Virginia Beach | Virginia | En reclutamiento |
| Wichita Urology Group | Wichita | Kansas | En reclutamiento |
| Minnesota Urology | Woodbury | Minnesota | En reclutamiento |
Documentos del estudio
No hay documentos enlazados en este registro.
Cambios a lo largo del tiempo
No se han registrado cambios desde que incorporamos este registro por primera vez.
Se registra un cambio cada vez que el patrocinador actualiza el registro. El estado, las fechas, la inscripción y los centros aparecen aquí a medida que cambian.