NCT05561114ClinicalTrials.gov
Paclitaxel Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Chronic bEnigN sTricture- Esophagus
En bref
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the ProTractX3™ DCB for the treatment of benign esophageal strictures.
Phase 3198 participants recherchés34 sites1 pays
Catégories
Enregistré dans 1 registre
- ClinicalTrials.govNCT05561114Ouvrir cette fiche sur ClinicalTrials.govSynchronisé il y a 2 mois
Une même étude peut être enregistrée dans plusieurs registres. Nous l'affichons une seule fois et renvoyons vers chaque fiche que nous détenons.
Les informations de l'essai sont affichées telles que publiées par le registre, dans leur langue d'origine.
Cette étude vous intéresse ?
Se connecter ou créez un compte pour manifester votre intérêt et suivre cette étude.
How this study is set up
The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.
- Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2022-09-30; recorded start 2023-12-01
- Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
- Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
- Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
- Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
- Present: Uses blinding (masking)A masking level is recorded in the record
- Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
- Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
- Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
- Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
- Present: Sponsor has 3 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (GIE Medical)
- Not stated: No posted results from this sponsor are in this database yetBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
- The record lists 1 condition.
- Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
- Intervention regulatory context: investigational, within a phased regulatory pathway.
Trial stature
Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.
A strong methodological design for a phase 3 study, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.
How this score is built
- Randomised allocation20/20
Participants are randomly allocated between arms
- Blinding7/20
Single-blind
- Control arm15/15
Active-comparator control arm
- Primary-outcome specificity10/10
Named primary outcome with a defined time frame
- Endpoint type3/10
Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)
- Multi-centre8/8
Multi-centre: 34 sites
- Data monitoring committee7/7
A data monitoring committee is in place
- Prospective registration5/5
Registered before the study start date
- Protocol / SAP posted0/5
No protocol or SAP posted to the registry
A small study: 198 participants (target), run at 34 sites.
How this score is built
- Enrolment22/40
198 participants (target)
- Site count18/25
34 sites
- Country count0/15
Single country
- Planned duration10/10
Planned over about 89 months
- Sponsor scale2/10
GIE Medical has led 4 trials in our corpus
We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.
How this score is built
- Investigator standing0/100
No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial
These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.
Résumé
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the ProTractX3™ DCB for the treatment of benign esophageal strictures.
Affections
- Esophageal Stricture
Éligibilité
| Sexe | Tous |
|---|---|
| Âges | 22 Years – Aucun maximum |
| Volontaires sains | Non |
Éligibilité telle qu'elle figure dans le registre
Éligibilité en énoncés simples
Les critères de cette fiche n'ont pas encore été décomposés en énoncés distincts. Le texte du registre ci-dessus est complet et fait foi.
Conception de l'étude
| Type d'étude | Interventionnelle |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 3 |
| Répartition | Randomisée |
| Modèle d'intervention | PARALLEL |
| Objectif principal | TREATMENT |
| Insu | SINGLE (1) |
| Recrutement | 198 participants recherchés |
Promoteur et collaborateurs
- GIE Medical Promoteur
Groupes et interventions
- ControlACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Standard of Care Endoscopic Dilation
- GIE Medical ProTractX3 TTS DCBEXPERIMENTAL
The ProTractX3 Drug-coated balloon is a 0.035" guidewire compatible over-the-wire catheter.
Interventions
- Autre Control
Standard Endoscopic Dilation
- Produit combiné GIE Medical ProTractX3 TTS DCB
Paclitaxel Coated Balloon
Critères de jugement
Critère de jugement principal
Treatment Success
1\. The primary efficacy endpoint is freedom from stricture recurrence, measured as the time from Index procedure until stricture recurrence through 6 months post-procedure. Stricture recurrence is defined as an esophageal diameter \<13mm as measured using a functional luminal imaging probe, or clinically driven reintervention at the treated area within 6 months post-procedure as determined by the Clinical Events Committee
Délai 6 Months Post-Procedure
Critère de jugement principal
Primary Safety Outcome
Incidence of device- and/or procedure-related Major Adverse Events (MAEs) (Death, perforation of the esophagus, bleeding requiring intervention or transfusion)
Délai 30 Days Post-Treatment
Critère de jugement secondaire
Annualized Rate of Reintervention
The annualized reintervention rate is defined as the annualized number of clinically driven interventions and will be assessed by comparing the annualized rate per patient year between groups using a test of Poisson rates.
Délai Annually
Critère de jugement secondaire
Diameter Improvement at 6 months
The minimum esophageal stricture diameter will be assessed by a functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP) during endoscopy and compared between the Test and Control arms. The minimum esophageal stricture diameter will be measured at baseline and during the 6-month follow-up, or at the time of a reintervention if one occurs prior to 6 months.
Délai 6 Months Post-Procedure
Critère de jugement secondaire
Clinical Responder Rate at 6 months
Délai 6 Months Post-Procedure
Critère de jugement secondaire
Freedom from clinically driven target stricture reintervention through 6 months post-procedure
Délai 6 Months Post-Procedure
Critère de jugement secondaire
Freedom from symptom recurrence through 6 months post-procedure
Délai 6 Months Post-Procedure
Autre critère de jugement
Secondary Patency
Délai Time between the index procedure to the second clinically driven intervention
Autre critère de jugement
Technical Success
Délai Procedure
Autre critère de jugement
Annualized rate of dilations before and after treatment
Délai Annually
Autre critère de jugement
Improvement in time between dilations
Délai Between Dilations
Autre critère de jugement
Improvement in Ogilvie Dysphagia Score at each follow-up
Délai 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter through 5 years
Autre critère de jugement
Improvement in Dysphagia Handicap Index score at each follow-up
Délai 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter through 5 years
Autre critère de jugement
Stricture characteristics per functional imaging
Délai Between Dilations
Autre critère de jugement
Number of esophageal dilation procedures through each follow up
Délai 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter through 5 years
Autre critère de jugement
Freedom from clinically driven reintervention through each follow-up
Délai 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter through 5 years
Autre critère de jugement
Freedom from symptom recurrence through each follow-up
Délai 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter through 5 years
Autre critère de jugement
VAS for pain scores through 30-day follow-up
Délai 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter through 5 years
Autre critère de jugement
Composite EQ-5D quality of life scores at each follow-up
Délai 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter through 5 years
Dates
| Date de début | 1 décembre 2023 (réelle) |
|---|---|
| Achèvement principal | 1 octobre 2026 (estimée) |
| Achèvement | 1 avril 2031 (estimée) |
| Première publication | 30 septembre 2022 (réelle) |
| Dernière mise à jour | 25 juin 2025 |
| Résultats publiés | Non précisé dans la fiche du registre |
| Statut vérifié pour la dernière fois | juin 2025 |
Réelle signifie que l'événement a eu lieu. Estimée signifie que le promoteur s'y attend. Les deux ont un sens différent.
Lieux
33 sites sont en recrutement
United States
| Établissement | Ville | État ou région | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Colorado Anschutz | Aurora | Colorado | En recrutement |
| Birmingham Gastroenterology Associates | Birmingham | Alabama | Pas encore en recrutement |
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | En recrutement |
| University of North Carolina Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | En recrutement |
| Rush University | Chicago | Illinois | En recrutement |
| University of Florida | Gainesville | Florida | En recrutement |
| Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center | Houston | Texas | En recrutement |
| University of California, Irvine | Irvine | California | En recrutement |
| Borland-Groover | Jacksonville | Florida | En recrutement |
| Gastro Care Institute | Lancaster | California | En recrutement |
| Sierra Clinical Research | Las Vegas | Nevada | En recrutement |
| Cedars Sinai | Los Angeles | California | En recrutement |
| University of Louisville | Louisville | Kentucky | En recrutement |
| Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia, LLC | Macon | Georgia | En recrutement |
| Tandem Clinical Research | Marrero | Louisiana | En recrutement |
| Research Associates of South Florida | Miami | Florida | En recrutement |
| West Virginia University | Morgantown | West Virginia | En recrutement |
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | En recrutement |
| New York Presbyterian Hospital- Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York | En recrutement |
| Hillcrest Medical Research | Orange City | Florida | En recrutement |
| Orlando Health | Orlando | Florida | En recrutement |
| University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | En recrutement |
| Thomas Jefferson University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | En recrutement |
| Einstein Medical Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | En recrutement |
| Rutgers University | Piscataway | New Jersey | En recrutement |
| Allegheny Health Network | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | En recrutement |
| TEN20 Clinical Research | Plano | Texas | En recrutement |
| Oregon Health and Science University | Portland | Oregon | En recrutement |
| The University of Utah | Salt Lake City | Utah | En recrutement |
| San Diego Gastroenterology | San Diego | California | En recrutement |
| Honor Health | Scottsdale | Arizona | En recrutement |
| Swedish Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | En recrutement |
| Washington University | St Louis | Missouri | En recrutement |
| Kansas Gastroenterology, LLC | Wichita | Kansas | En recrutement |
Documents de l'étude
Aucun document n'est lié dans cette fiche du registre.
Évolution au fil du temps
Aucun changement n'a été enregistré depuis que nous avons intégré cette fiche pour la première fois.
Un changement est enregistré chaque fois que le promoteur met à jour la fiche du registre. Le statut, les dates, le recrutement et les sites apparaissent ici au fur et à mesure de leur évolution.