Aller au contenu principal
xMedica

NCT07196722ClinicalTrials.gov

A Study of Icotrokinra in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

A Phase 2b/3 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Protocol to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Icotrokinra in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

En recrutementAccepte des participants actuellement, selon la fiche du registre.
Contacter cette étude

En bref

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how-well icotrokinra works (clinical efficacy) and how safe it is (safety) in participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD; a long-term condition causing severe inflammation of the intestinal tract).

Phase 2 / Phase 31 092 participants recherchés370 sites28 pays

Catégories

Enregistré dans 1 registre

Une même étude peut être enregistrée dans plusieurs registres. Nous l'affichons une seule fois et renvoyons vers chaque fiche que nous détenons.

Les informations de l'essai sont affichées telles que publiées par le registre, dans leur langue d'origine.

Cette étude vous intéresse ?

Se connecter ou créez un compte pour manifester votre intérêt et suivre cette étude.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2025-09-29; recorded start 2025-10-03
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
  • Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
  • Present: Uses blinding (masking)A masking level is recorded in the record
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 228 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Janssen Research & Development, LLC)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 1 condition.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
  • Intervention regulatory context: investigational, within a phased regulatory pathway.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourSTRONG

A strong methodological design for a phase 3 study, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation20/20

    Participants are randomly allocated between arms

  • Blinding13/20

    Double-blind

  • Control arm13/15

    Placebo / sham control arm

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type3/10

    Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 367 sites

  • Data monitoring committee7/7

    A data monitoring committee is in place

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleLARGE

A large study, international in scope: 1,092 participants (target), run at 370 sites, across 28 countries.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment30/40

    1,092 participants (target)

  • Site count25/25

    367 sites

  • Country count15/15

    28 countries

  • Planned duration10/10

    Planned over about 85 months

  • Sponsor scale9/10

    Janssen Research & Development, LLC has led 226 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Résumé

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how-well icotrokinra works (clinical efficacy) and how safe it is (safety) in participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD; a long-term condition causing severe inflammation of the intestinal tract).

Affections

  • Crohn Disease

Éligibilité

Éligibilité
SexeTous
Âges18 YearsAucun maximum
Volontaires sainsNon

Éligibilité telle qu'elle figure dans le registre

Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of CD established at least 12 weeks before screening including both endoscopic evidence and a histopathology report consistent with a diagnosis of CD * Moderately to severely active CD based on CDAI criteria, defined as baseline (Week I-0) CDAI score \>=220 but \<=450 and either mean daily SF count \>=4, or mean daily AP score \>=2 * Moderately to severely active CD based on SES-CD criteria assessed by baseline (Week I-0) endoscopic evidence of active ileal and/or colonic CD as assessed during central review of the screening video ileocolonoscopy defined as a SES-CD \>= 6 for participants with colonic or ileocolonic disease, and SES-CD \>= 4 for participants with isolated ileal disease, based on the presence of ulceration in any 1 of the 5 ileocolonic segments * A female participant of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test (beta-hCG) at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at Week I-0 prior to administration of study intervention and agree to further pregnancy tests * Demonstrated an inadequate response to, or failure to tolerate conventional therapy but naïve to advanced therapies (advanced drug therapy \[ADT\]-naïve) or inadequate response to (that is, primary or secondary nonresponse) or failure to tolerate advanced therapy defined as biologics and/or advanced oral agents for the treatment of CD- (ADT-inadequate responder \[IR\]) as defined in the protocol Exclusion criteria: * Has complications of CD, such as symptomatic strictures or stenoses, short gut syndrome, or any other manifestation, that may require surgery while enrolled in the study and/or could impair the use of instruments (such as CDAI) to assess response to study intervention * Presence of a stoma or ostomy * Participants with presence of active fistulas may be included if there is no surgery needed * Colonic resection within 24 weeks before baseline or any other major surgery performed within 12 weeks before baseline * Presence on screening colonoscopy of adenomatous colon polyps outside of an area of known colitis not removed before randomization

Éligibilité en énoncés simples

Les critères de cette fiche n'ont pas encore été décomposés en énoncés distincts. Le texte du registre ci-dessus est complet et fait foi.

Conception de l'étude

Conception de l'étude
Type d'étudeInterventionnelle
PhasePhase 2 / Phase 3
RépartitionRandomisée
Modèle d'interventionPARALLEL
Objectif principalTREATMENT
InsuDOUBLE (2)
Recrutement1 092 participants recherchés

Promoteur et collaborateurs

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC Promoteur

Groupes et interventions

  • Induction Study 1: Icotrokinra Dose 1EXPERIMENTAL

    Participants will receive Icotrokinra dose 1 in Induction Study 1 up to Week 12. Subsequent treatment will be determined by the participant's response status at Week 12.

  • Induction Study 1: Icotrokinra Dose 2EXPERIMENTAL

    Participants will receive Icotrokinra dose 2 in Induction Study 1 up to Week 12. Subsequent treatment will be determined by the participant's response status at Week 12.

  • Induction Study 1: PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATOR

    Participants will receive matching placebo in Induction Study 1 up to Week 12. Subsequent treatment will be determined by the participant's response status at Week 12.

  • Induction Study 2: IcotrokinraEXPERIMENTAL

    Participants will receive Icotrokinra at the dose regimen determined in Induction Study 1 up to Week 12. Subsequent study treatment will be determined by the participant's response status at Week 12.

  • Induction Study 2: PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATOR

    Participants will receive matching placebo for up to Week 12. Subsequent study treatment will be determined by the participant's response status at Week 12.

  • Maintenance Study: Icotrokinra Dose 1EXPERIMENTAL

    Participants who were receiving icotrokinra in either induction studies 1 or 2 and were in response at Week 12 of the induction study will be randomized to receive icotrokinra maintenance dose 1. Participants receiving Icotrokinra Dose 1 and meeting criteria for loss of response during the Maintenance Study will be eligibile for a single blinded dose adjustment to Icotrokinra Dose 2. After completion of the Maintenance Study through Week 40, eligible participants can participate in long-term extension (LTE).

  • Maintenance Study: Icotrokinra Dose 2EXPERIMENTAL

    Participants who were receiving icotrokinra in either induction studies 1 or 2 and were in response at Week 12 of the induction study will be randomized to receive icotrokinra maintenance dose 2. Participants who were non-responders at Week 12 of the induction studies will also receive icotrokinra maintenance dose 2 but will not be randomized. After completion of the Maintenance Study through Week 40, eligible participants can participate in LTE.

  • Maintenance Study: PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATOR

    Participants who were receiving icotrokinra in either induction studies 1 or 2 and were in response at Week 12 will be randomized to receive placebo. Participants receiving placebo in induction studies 1 or 2 and in response at Week 12 of the induction study will continue to receive placebo during maintenance on non-randomized basis. Placebo non-responders from induction study will receive icotrokinra maintenance dose 2 on a non-randomized basis and will be assessed for response at Week 12. Participants receiving placebo and meeting criteria for loss of response during the Maintenance Study will be eligible for a single blinded dose adjustment to icotrokinra dose 2. After completion of the Maintenance Study through Week 40, eligible participants can participate in LTE.

Interventions

  • Médicament Icotrokinra

    Icotrokinra will be administered orally, daily.

  • Médicament Placebo

    Matching placebo will be administered orally, daily.

Critères de jugement

  1. Critère de jugement principal

    Induction Study 1: Number of Participants with Clinical Response at Week 12

    Clinical response is defined as a greater than or equal to (\>=) 100-point reduction from baseline in Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600. Higher score indicates higher disease activity.

    Délai At Week 12

  2. Critère de jugement principal

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 12 (Co-Primary Endpoint)

    Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score less than (\<) 150. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600. Higher score indicates higher disease activity.

    Délai At Week 12

  3. Critère de jugement principal

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants with Endoscopic Response at Week 12 (Co-Primary Endpoint)

    Endoscopic response is defined as greater than (\>) 50% improvement from baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) score or a decrease of at least 2 points in participants with a baseline score of 4 and isolated ileal disease. SES-CD score can range from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Délai At Week 12

  4. Critère de jugement principal

    Maintenance Study: Number of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 40 (Co-Primary Endpoint)

    Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score \< 150. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600. Higher score indicates higher disease activity.

    Délai At Week 40

  5. Critère de jugement principal

    Maintenance Study: Number of Participants with Endoscopic Response at Week 40 (Co-Primary Endpoint)

    Endoscopic response is defined as \> 50% improvement from baseline in SES-CD score or a decrease of at least 2 points in participants with a baseline score of 4 and isolated ileal disease. SES-CD score can range from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Délai At Week 40

  6. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 1: Number of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 12

    Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score \< 150. CDAI scores ranging from 0 to approximately 600. Higher score indicates higher disease activity.

    Délai At Week 12

  7. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 1: Number of Participants with Endoscopic Response at Week 12

    Endoscopic response is defined as \> 50% improvement from baseline in SES-CD score or a decrease of at least 2 points in participants with a baseline score of 4 and isolated ileal disease. SES-CD score can range from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Délai At Week 12

  8. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 1: Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product and is medically important.

    Délai Up to 4 weeks after last dose of study drug (i.e., up to Week 16)

  9. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants with Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO)-2 Remission at Week 12

    PRO-2 remission is defined as an abdominal pain (AP) mean daily score less than or equal to (\<=) 1 and stool frequency (SF) mean daily score \<= 2.8, and no worsening of AP or SF from baseline.

    Délai At Week 12

  10. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants with Clinical Response at Week 12

    Clinical response is defined as a \>= 100-point reduction from baseline in CDAI score.

    Délai At Week 12

  11. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants Reporting Both Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Response at Week 12

    Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score \< 150. Endoscopic response is defined as \> 50% improvement from baseline in SES-CD score or a decrease of at least 2 points in participants with a baseline score of 4 and isolated ileal disease. This is a composite endpoint defined to measure achievement of both clinical remission and endoscopic response at the participant level.

    Délai At Week 12

  12. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants with Clinical Response at Week 4

    Clinical response is defined as a \>= 100-point reduction from baseline in CDAI score.

    Délai At Week 4

  13. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants with Endoscopic Remission at Week 12

    Endoscopic remission is defined as SES-CD \<= 4 with at least a 2-point reduction from baseline and no sub score \>1 in any individual component.

    Délai At Week 12

  14. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants with Deep Remission at Week 12

    Deep remission is a composite endpoint defined as achieving both clinical remission and endoscopic remission at the participant level. Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score \< 150-point. Endoscopic remission is defined as SES-CD \<= 4 with at least a 2-point reduction from baseline and no sub score \>1 in any individual component.

    Délai At Week 12

  15. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission at Week 12

    IBDQ remission is defined as IBDQ score \>= 170. IBDQ is a validated, 32-item, self-reported questionnaire for participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that will be used to evaluate the disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) across 4 dimensional scores: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). Scores range from 32 to 224, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Délai At Week 12

  16. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants with Fatigue Response at Week 12

    Fatigue response is defined as a \>= 7 point reduction in the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS)-Fatigue Short Form 7a total score from baseline. The PROMIS fatigue SF-7a contains 7 items evaluating fatigue-related symptoms (that is, tiredness, exhaustion, mental tiredness, and lack of energy) and associated impacts on daily activities (that is, activity limitations related to work, self-care, and exercise). Item responses are rated on a five-point scale ranging from "never" to "always". Higher scores indicate more fatigue.

    Délai At Week 12

  17. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 4

    Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score\< 150.

    Délai At Week 4

  18. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants Reporting Both Histologic Remission and Endoscopic Remission at Week 12

    Histologic remission is defined as a Robarts Histopathology Index score \<=3, where each of the items of lamina propria neutrophils, neutrophils in epithelium, and erosions or ulcerations must be equal to 0. Endoscopic remission is defined as SES-CD \<= 4 with at least a 2-point reduction from baseline and no sub score \>1 in any individual component. This is a composite endpoint defined as achieving both histologic remission and endoscopic remission at the participant level.

    Délai At Week 12

  19. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Induction Study 2: Number of Participants with AEs and SAEs

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product and is medically important.

    Délai Up to 4 weeks after last dose of study drug (i.e., up to Week 16)

  20. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Maintenance Study: Number of Participants with PRO-2 remission at Week 40

    PRO-2 remission is defined as an abdominal pain (AP) mean daily score \<= 1 and stool frequency (SF) mean daily score \<= 2.8, and no worsening of AP or SF from baseline.

    Délai At Week 40

  21. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Maintenance Study: Number of Participants with Endoscopic Remission at Week 40

    Endoscopic remission is defined as SES-CD \<= 4 with at least a 2-point reduction from baseline and no sub score \>1 in any individual component.

    Délai At Week 40

  22. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Maintenance Study: Number of Participants with 90-Day Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 40

    90-day corticosteroid-free clinical remission is defined as the clinical remission at the visit and not receiving corticosteroids for at least 90 days prior to the visit. Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score \< 150.

    Délai At Week 40

  23. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Maintenance Study: Number of Participants with Maintenance of Clinical Remission at Week 40

    Participants with clinical remission at Week 40 among those with clinical remission at Week 0 of the maintenance study will be analyzed. Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score \< 150.

    Délai At Week 40

  24. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Maintenance Study: Number of Participants Reporting Both Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Response at Week 40

    Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score \< 150. Endoscopic response is defined as \> 50% improvement from baseline in SES-CD score or a decrease of at least 2 points in participants with a baseline score of 4 and isolated ileal disease. This is a composite endpoint defined to measure achievement of both clinical remission and endoscopic response at the participant level.

    Délai At Week 40

  25. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Maintenance Study: Number of Participants with Deep Remission at Week 40

    Deep remission is a composite endpoint defined as achieving both clinical remission and endoscopic remission at the participant level. Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score \< 150. Endoscopic remission is defined as SES-CD \<= 4 with at least a 2-point reduction from baseline and no sub score \>1 in any individual component.

    Délai At Week 40

  26. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Maintenance Study: Number of Participants Reporting Both Histologic Remission and Endoscopic Remission at Week 40

    Histologic remission is defined as a Robarts Histopathology Index score \<=3, where each of the items of lamina propria neutrophils, neutrophils in epithelium, and erosions or ulcerations must be equal to 0. Endoscopic remission is defined as SES-CD \<= 4 with at least a 2-point reduction from baseline and no sub score \>1 in any individual component. This is a composite endpoint defined as achieving both histologic remission and endoscopic remission at the participant level.

    Délai At Week 40

  27. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Maintenance Study: Number of Participants with IBDQ Remission at Week 40

    IBDQ remission is defined as IBDQ score \>= 170. IBDQ is a validated, 32-item, self-reported questionnaire for participants with IBD that will be used to evaluate the disease-specific HRQoL across 4 dimensional scores: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). Scores range from 32 to 224, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Délai At Week 40

  28. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Maintenance Study: Number of Participants with Fatigue Response at Week 40

    Fatigue response is defined as a \>= 7 point reduction in the PROMIS-Fatigue Short Form 7a total score from baseline. The PROMIS fatigue SF-7a contains 7 items evaluating fatigue-related symptoms (that is, tiredness, exhaustion, mental tiredness, and lack of energy) and associated impacts on daily activities (that is, activity limitations related to work, self-care, and exercise). Item responses are rated on a five-point scale ranging from "never" to "always". Higher scores indicate more fatigue.

    Délai At Week 40

  29. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Maintenance Study : Number of Participants with AEs and SAEs

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product and is medically important.

    Délai Up to 4 weeks after last dose of study drug (i.e., up to Week 44)

Dates

Dates
Date de début3 octobre 2025 (réelle)
Achèvement principal19 septembre 2028 (estimée)
Achèvement10 octobre 2032 (estimée)
Première publication29 septembre 2025 (réelle)
Dernière mise à jour28 août 2026
Résultats publiésNon précisé dans la fiche du registre
Statut vérifié pour la dernière foisaoût 2026

Réelle signifie que l'événement a eu lieu. Estimée signifie que le promoteur s'y attend. Les deux ont un sens différent.

Lieux

361 sites sont en recrutement

Argentina

Argentina
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
GEDYTAAIEn recrutement
Hospital AlemanBuenos AiresEn recrutement
Hospital Britanico de Buenos AiresCABAEn recrutement
Clinica Universitaria Reina FabiolaCórdobaEn recrutement
Hospital Privado de CordobaCórdobaEn recrutement
Sanatorio MaipuMaipuEn recrutement
HIGEAMendozaEn recrutement

Australia

Australia
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Monash HealthClaytonEn recrutement
Concord Repatriation General HospitalConcordEn recrutement
St Vincents Hospital MelbourneFitzroyEn recrutement
Fiona Stanley HospitalMurdochEn recrutement
John Hunter HospitalNew Lambton HeightsEn recrutement
Mater Hospital BrisbaneSouth BrisbaneEn recrutement

Belgium

Belgium
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Cliniques Universitaires Saint LucBrusselsEn recrutement
CHU Saint-PierreBrusselsEn recrutement
AZ St. LucasGhentEn recrutement
Ghent University HospitalGhentEn recrutement
Universitair Ziekenhuis LeuvenLeuvenEn recrutement
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege Domaine Universitaire du Sart TilmanLiègeEn recrutement
AZ OostendeOstendEn recrutement
CHwapiTournaiEn recrutement

Brazil

Brazil
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Faculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteEn recrutement
UNESP - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Estadual Paulista - Campus BotucatuBotucatuEn recrutement
Chronos Clinica Medica LtdaBrasíliaEn recrutement
L2IP Instituto de Pesquisas ClinicasBrasíliaEn recrutement
CDC - Centro Digestivo de CuritibaCuritibaEn recrutement
ATO TerapiasFortalezaEn recrutement
CECIP Jau - Centro de Estudos Clínicos do Interior Paulista LtdaJaúEn recrutement
Galileo Medical Research LtdaJuiz de ForaEn recrutement
CligedMacaéEn recrutement
Liga Norte Riograndense Contra O CancerNatalEn recrutement
Complexo Hospitalar de NiteroiNiteróiEn recrutement
Hospital De Clinicas De Porto AlegrePorto AlegreEn recrutement
Hospital Ernesto DornellesPorto AlegreEn recrutement
Hospital Moinhos de VentoPorto AlegreEn recrutement
Platano Centro De Pesquisa Clinica LTDARecifeEn recrutement
Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao PretoRibeirão PretoEn recrutement
Clinica Ibis Medicina LtdaSalvadorEn recrutement
Pesquisare SaudeSanto AndréEn recrutement
Irmandade da Santa Casa da Misericórdia de SantosSantosEn recrutement
Funfarme SjrpSão José do Rio PretoEn recrutement
Hospital Santa CatarinaSão PauloEn recrutement
Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Hospital Albert EinsteinSão PauloEn recrutement
Hospital Das Clinicas Da Faculdade De Medicina Da USPSão PauloEn recrutement
Solare TrialsSão PauloEn recrutement
BR TrialsSão PauloEn recrutement
INTEGRAL Pesquisa e EnsinoVotuporangaEn recrutement

Canada

Canada
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Barrie GI AssociatesBarrieOntarioEn recrutement
South Edmonton Gastroenterology Research ClinicEdmontonAlbertaEn recrutement
Viable Clinical ResearchKentvilleNova ScotiaEn recrutement

320 sites supplémentaires sont indiqués dans la fiche du registre.

Documents de l'étude

Aucun document n'est lié dans cette fiche du registre.

Évolution au fil du temps

  1. 28 août 2026

    Site ajouté

    2 sites added (370 total)

    368370

  2. 31 juillet 2026

    Site ajouté

    1 site added (368 total)

    367368