NCT07209397ClinicalTrials.gov

Detrusor Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Overactive Bladder in Women

A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study to Assess the MORPHEUSV Radiofrequency (RF) Device in the Treatment of Female Patients With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder (OAB) With Urge Incontinence and/or Urge-Predominant Mixed Incontinence

En recrutementAccepte des participants actuellement, selon la fiche du registre.

Contacter cette étude

En bref

Interventionnelle202 participants recherchés9 sites1 pays

Catégories

Néphrologie et urologie96%Obstétrique et gynécologie4%

Enregistré dans 1 registre

ClinicalTrials.govNCT07209397Ouvrir cette fiche sur ClinicalTrials.govSynchronisé il y a 2 mois

Une même étude peut être enregistrée dans plusieurs registres. Nous l'affichons une seule fois et renvoyons vers chaque fiche que nous détenons.

Les informations de l'essai sont affichées telles que publiées par le registre, dans leur langue d'origine.

Cette étude vous intéresse ?

Se connecter ou créez un compte pour manifester votre intérêt et suivre cette étude.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2025-10-07; recorded start 2025-11-25
Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
Present: Uses blinding (masking)A masking level is recorded in the record
Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
Present: Sponsor has 5 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (InMode MD Ltd.)
Not stated: No posted results from this sponsor are in this database yetBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database

The record lists 7 conditions.
Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.

These are facts from the public registry record, not a judgement about the study. Discuss any trial with your own doctor before taking part.

What these facts mean, and what to ask · ruleset v1

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourSTRONG

A strong methodological design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built

Randomised allocation20/20
Participants are randomly allocated between arms
Blinding20/20
Quadruple-blind
Control arm15/15
Active-comparator control arm
Primary-outcome specificity10/10
Named primary outcome with a defined time frame
Endpoint type3/10
Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)
Multi-centre5/8
Multi-centre: 9 sites
Data monitoring committee0/7
No data monitoring committee stated
Prospective registration5/5
Registered before the study start date
Protocol / SAP posted0/5
No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleMEDIUM

A medium-sized study: 202 participants (target), run at 9 sites.

How this score is built

Enrolment22/40
202 participants (target)
Site count11/25
9 sites
Country count0/15
Single country
Planned duration7/10
Planned over about 25 months
Sponsor scale2/10
InMode MD Ltd. has led 6 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built

Investigator standing0/100
No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Résumé

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a vaginal radiofrequency (RF) device called MORPHEUSV works to treat overactive bladder (OAB) in women. Researchers also want to learn how safe the device is for this indication. This study will include women ages 22 to 80 who have had OAB symptoms for at least 6 months. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the MORPHEUSV device lower the number of daily episodes of accidental urine leakage caused by urgency? Does it work better than a sham (placebo) treatment? Researchers will compare the MORPHEUSV device to a sham treatment to see how well it reduces symptoms of overactive bladder. Participants will: 1) Receive one session of either the MORPHEUSV or sham treatment. 2) Track their symptoms using a diary and questionnaires 3) Return for three to six follow-up visits over 12 months. This study is being conducted at multiple clinics in the United States.

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition that significantly impacts the quality of life in women, especially those with urge urinary incontinence (UUI) or mixed incontinence with a predominant urgency component. Current treatments for OAB, including behavioral therapy and pharmacologic agents, often have limited long-term efficacy, tolerability issues, or low adherence rates. There is a significant need for alternative, non-invasive therapies that can provide symptom relief with fewer side effects. The MORPHEUSV system is a vaginally delivered radiofrequency (RF) energy device designed to remodel submucosal tissue through controlled thermal stimulation. This technology is currently being investigated for its ability to improve bladder control by targeting pelvic tissue support and neuromodulation pathways. The device is investigational for this indication and is being studied under an FDA-approved Investigational Device Exemption (IDE G250071). This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the MORPHEUSV RF device in women aged 22 to 80 with idiopathic OAB and at least 7 episodes of UUI per week. The study will enroll approximately 202 participants at up to 12 sites across the United States. Participants will be randomized 2:1 to either a single session of active RF treatment or a sham (placebo) treatment. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants achieving a ≥50% reduction in UUI episodes from baseline at 6 months. Secondary and exploratory outcomes include symptom reduction across urgency, frequency, nocturia, and quality of life metrics, as well as device-related adverse events. Blinding will be maintained through the use of an identical sham applicator with no RF energy delivery. A crossover option is available for sham subjects who complete the 6-month follow-up, allowing them to receive the active treatment. All participants will be followed for 12 months after their initial intervention to evaluate durability of response and long-term safety. An internal data review committee will periodically evaluate cumulative safety data. The study is conducted under Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines and will be overseen by Sterling IRB.

Affections

Overactive Bladder
Overactive Bladder (OAB)
Urge Urinary Incontinence
Mixed Urinary Incontinence (Urge-Predominant)
Mixed Urinary Incontinence
Idiopathic Overactive Bladder With Urinary Incontinence
Idiopathic Overactive Bladder

Éligibilité

Éligibilité
Sexe	Femme
Âges	22 Years – 80 Years
Volontaires sains	Non

Éligibilité telle qu'elle figure dans le registre

INCLUSION CRITERIA: * Female, aged 22 to 80 years inclusive at the time of consent. * History of idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms for ≥6 months. * At least 7 episodes of urge urinary incontinence (UUI) over 3 days, as recorded in a 3-day bladder diary during screening. * Urge-predominant incontinence, defined as greater number of UUI episodes than stress urinary incontinence (SUI) episodes during screening. * Willing and able to complete the 3-day bladder diary. * Willing to discontinue OAB medications (e.g., anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists) at least 2 weeks prior to baseline treatment visit, if currently taking such medications. * Willing to use a reliable method of contraception during the study period, if of childbearing potential and sexually active. * Negative pregnancy test at screening (if applicable). * Willing and able to provide written informed consent and comply with study procedures and follow-up schedule. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: * Predominant stress urinary incontinence (SUI) based on bladder diary * Currently pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy during the study * History of neurologic conditions affecting bladder function (e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease) * Active urinary tract infection (UTI) at screening * History of interstitial cystitis, bladder pain syndrome, or chronic pelvic pain * Prior or current bladder cancer, pelvic malignancy, or pelvic radiation * Pelvic organ prolapse beyond the hymen (POP-Q stage \> II) * Implanted neuromodulation device or prior sacral nerve stimulation * Use of bulking agents, Botox, or surgical treatment for incontinence within 12 months * Prior pelvic floor RF treatment or laser vaginal rejuvenation * Significant pelvic anatomical abnormalities that interfere with treatment * Use of investigational drug or device within 30 days before screening * Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with safe study participation or data integrity * Uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, cardiovascular disease) * Inability or unwillingness to comply with study requirements or follow-up

Éligibilité en énoncés simples

Les critères de cette fiche n'ont pas encore été décomposés en énoncés distincts. Le texte du registre ci-dessus est complet et fait foi.

Conception de l'étude

Conception de l'étude
Type d'étude	Interventionnelle
Phase	Sans objet
Répartition	Randomisée
Modèle d'intervention	PARALLEL
Objectif principal	TREATMENT
Insu	QUADRUPLE (4)
Recrutement	202 participants recherchés

Promoteur et collaborateurs

InMode MD Ltd. Promoteur
Foundation for Female Health Awareness Collaborateurs

Groupes et interventions

MORPHEUSV Treatment ArmACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Participants in this arm will receive a single session of radiofrequency (RF) treatment using the MORPHEUSV device. The treatment is delivered vaginally using a bipolar RF applicator at a therapeutic energy setting. No anesthesia is required. Participants will be followed for 12 months to evaluate safety and effectiveness.
Sham Control ArmSHAM_COMPARATOR
Participants in this arm will undergo a procedure using a visually identical MORPHEUSV applicator, but without RF energy delivery (sham). The procedure mimics the appearance and duration of the active treatment. Participants will be followed for 12 months. After completing the 6-month follow-up, they may elect to cross over and receive a single session of the active RF treatment.

Interventions

Dispositif Detrusor nerve radiofrequency ablation
A single, vaginal radiofrequency (RF) treatment. The procedure is performed with a bipolar RF applicator and requires no anesthesia. Delivered in a single session in an outpatient setting.
Dispositif Simulated (sham) detrusor nerve radiofrequency ablation
A simulated (sham) radiofrequency (RF) treatment, but with no energy delivered. The procedure mimics the appearance, duration, and positioning of the active device, without therapeutic effect.

Critères de jugement

Critère de jugement principal
Proportion of participants achieving ≥50% reduction in weekly urge urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes
The percentage of participants who achieve at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of UUI episodes per week, as recorded in a 7-day bladder diary. This is the primary efficacy endpoint used to evaluate the effectiveness of the MORPHEUSV device compared to sham.
Délai 6 months post-treatment
Critère de jugement secondaire
Change from baseline in mean number of UUI episodes per week
Mean change in UUI episodes per week from baseline, based on 7-day bladder diary.
Délai 6 months
Critère de jugement secondaire
Change from baseline in mean number of urgency episodes per week
Mean change in urgency episodes per week from baseline, based on bladder diary.
Délai 6 months
Critère de jugement secondaire
Change from baseline in mean number of micturitions per 24 hours
Change in average number of daily voids as measured via bladder diary.
Délai 6 Months
Critère de jugement secondaire
Change from baseline in Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) total score
Mean change from baseline in total score on the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL), a validated 22-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Délai 6 Months
Critère de jugement secondaire
Change from baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) score
Mean change from baseline in urgency perception severity measured using the Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), a validated patient-reported scale assessing urinary urgency severity. UPS scores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater urgency severity (worse symptoms).
Délai 6 Months
Critère de jugement secondaire
Incidence and severity of adverse events
Frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events in each arm, collected at all follow-up visits.
Délai 12 Months

Dates

Dates
Date de début	25 novembre 2025 (réelle)
Achèvement principal	30 juin 2027 (estimée)
Achèvement	30 novembre 2027 (estimée)
Première publication	7 octobre 2025 (réelle)
Dernière mise à jour	30 janvier 2026
Résultats publiés	Non précisé dans la fiche du registre
Statut vérifié pour la dernière fois	août 2025

Réelle signifie que l'événement a eu lieu. Estimée signifie que le promoteur s'y attend. Les deux ont un sens différent.

Lieux

5 sites sont en recrutement

United States

United States
Établissement	Ville	État ou région	Statut
Advanced Specialty Research	Boise	Idaho	En recrutement
University of Chicago Medicine Urogynecology	Chicago	Illinois	Pas encore en recrutement
UNLV Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine Department of Gynecologic Surgery & Obstetrics	Las Vegas	Nevada	Pas encore en recrutement
Urology Center, P.C.	Omaha	Nebraska	En recrutement
Stanford Medicine Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology	Palo Alto	California	Pas encore en recrutement
MedStar Health Research Institute	Washington D.C.	District of Columbia	Pas encore en recrutement
Bay State Clinical Trials	Watertown	Massachusetts	En recrutement
Cypress Medical Research Center	Wichita	Kansas	En recrutement
Atrium Health Wake Forest Female Pelvic Health Division	Winston-Salem	North Carolina	En recrutement

Documents de l'étude

Aucun document n'est lié dans cette fiche du registre.

Évolution au fil du temps

Aucun changement n'a été enregistré depuis que nous avons intégré cette fiche pour la première fois.

Un changement est enregistré chaque fois que le promoteur met à jour la fiche du registre. Le statut, les dates, le recrutement et les sites apparaissent ici au fur et à mesure de leur évolution.

Registre: ClinicalTrials.gov · NCT########

https://xmedica.io/trials/ctgov/NCT07209397