NCT07453069ClinicalTrials.gov
Effect of FB301 on Vaginal Bacterial Profile in Women With Asymptomatic Vaginal Dysbiosis Undergoing a Mock Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycle
A Randomized, Double-blind, Three Arm, Multi-center Phase 2 Study to Investigate the Molecular Efficacy and Safety of FB301/Chlorhexidine Compared With FB301/Sham and Placebo/Sham in a Mock FET Cycle in Female Participants 18-40 Years of Age With Asymptomatic Vaginal Molecular Dysbiosis Planning to Undergo a Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) Cycle
En bref
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate FB301 during a mock frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle in pre-menopausal women aged 18 to 40 years with a prior failed FET and a defined vaginal bacterial imbalance (dysbiosis). The main…
Phase 230 participants recherchés4 sites1 pays
Catégories
Enregistré dans 1 registre
- ClinicalTrials.govNCT07453069Ouvrir cette fiche sur ClinicalTrials.govSynchronisé il y a 3 semaines
Une même étude peut être enregistrée dans plusieurs registres. Nous l'affichons une seule fois et renvoyons vers chaque fiche que nous détenons.
Les informations de l'essai sont affichées telles que publiées par le registre, dans leur langue d'origine.
Cette étude vous intéresse ?
Se connecter ou créez un compte pour manifester votre intérêt et suivre cette étude.
How this study is set up
The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.
- Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2026-03-05; recorded start 2026-07-22
- Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
- Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
- Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
- Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
- Present: Uses blinding (masking)A masking level is recorded in the record
- Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
- Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
- Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
- Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
- Present: Sponsor has 3 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Freya Biosciences ApS)
- Not stated: No posted results from this sponsor are in this database yetBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
- The record lists 1 condition.
- Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
- Intervention regulatory context: investigational, within a phased regulatory pathway.
Trial stature
Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.
A strong methodological design for a phase 2 study, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.
How this score is built
- Randomised allocation20/20
Participants are randomly allocated between arms
- Blinding16/20
Triple-blind
- Control arm13/15
Placebo / sham control arm
- Primary-outcome specificity10/10
Named primary outcome with a defined time frame
- Endpoint type3/10
Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)
- Multi-centre0/8
Single site, or site count not stated
- Data monitoring committee7/7
A data monitoring committee is in place
- Prospective registration5/5
Registered before the study start date
- Protocol / SAP posted0/5
No protocol or SAP posted to the registry
A small study: 30 participants (target), run at 4 sites.
How this score is built
- Enrolment12/40
30 participants (target)
- Site count0/25
1 sites
- Country count0/15
Single country
- Planned duration6/10
Planned over about 18 months
- Sponsor scale2/10
Freya Biosciences ApS has led 4 trials in our corpus
We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.
How this score is built
- Investigator standing0/100
No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial
These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.
Résumé
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate FB301 during a mock frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle in pre-menopausal women aged 18 to 40 years with a prior failed FET and a defined vaginal bacterial imbalance (dysbiosis). The main question it aims to answer is: • Does treatment with FB301 during a mock FET cycle change the proportion of participants who meet the predefined vaginal bacterial threshold compared with placebo? Researchers will compare: * FB301 given after an initial vaginal cleansing with chlorhexidine (an antiseptic solution), * FB301 given after an initial vaginal cleansing with saline (saltwater), and * A placebo capsule given after an initial vaginal cleansing with saline to determine whether these approaches affect vaginal bacterial composition and pregnancy outcomes. Participants will take study treatment for 15 days during a "mock" FET cycle. In a mock cycle, participants receive the hormones needed to prepare the uterus for embryo transfer, but no embryo is transferred. After completing the mock cycle, participants will proceed with their planned frozen embryo transfer and will be followed during pregnancy until birth. Participants will: * Undergo a vaginal cleansing before receiving the first dose of FB301 or placebo * Provide vaginal swab samples at up to 5 study visits * Attend the study centre for up to 8 visits and participate in up to 4 follow-up phone calls * Complete a mock FET cycle before proceeding with their planned frozen embryo transfer cycle Participants who become pregnant will be followed until birth.
Affections
- Vaginal Dysbiosis
Éligibilité
| Sexe | Femme |
|---|---|
| Âges | 18 Years – 40 Years |
| Volontaires sains | Non |
Éligibilité telle qu'elle figure dans le registre
Éligibilité en énoncés simples
Les critères de cette fiche n'ont pas encore été décomposés en énoncés distincts. Le texte du registre ci-dessus est complet et fait foi.
Conception de l'étude
| Type d'étude | Interventionnelle |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 2 |
| Répartition | Randomisée |
| Modèle d'intervention | PARALLEL |
| Objectif principal | TREATMENT |
| Insu | TRIPLE (3) |
| Recrutement | 30 participants recherchés |
Promoteur et collaborateurs
- Freya Biosciences ApS Promoteur
- Premier Research Collaborateurs
Groupes et interventions
- FB301 / ChlorhexidineEXPERIMENTAL
- FB301 / ShamEXPERIMENTAL
- Placebo / ShamPLACEBO_COMPARATOR
Interventions
- Autre Chlorhexidine (0.5%) Vaginal Cleanse
Vaginal cleanse with 0.5% Chlorhexidine solution prior to first IP administration
- Médicament FB-301
FB301 capsule
- Médicament Placebo
FB301 Placebo capsule
- Autre Sham vaginal cleanse (saline)
Vaginal cleanse with saline solution prior to first IP administration.
Critères de jugement
Critère de jugement principal
Proportion of participants with ≥90% combined relative abundance of Lactobacillus crispatus, L. jensenii, L. mulieris, L. gasseri, and L. paragasseri as measured by metagenomic sequencing.
Metagenomic sequencing is performed on cervical vaginal swab samples. Relative abundance is expressed as a percentage of bacterial sequencing reads that are assigned to a specific bacterial species.
Délai Baseline to Day 16 (Mock FET cycle)
Critère de jugement secondaire
Percentage change from baseline in relative abundance of Lactobacillus crispatus, L. jensenii, L. mulieris, L. gasseri, and L. paragasseri as measured by metagenomic sequencing.
Metagenomic sequencing is performed on cervical vaginal swab samples. Relative abundance is expressed as a percentage of bacterial sequencing reads that are assigned to a specific bacterial species.
Délai Baseline to Day 16 (Mock FET cycle)
Critère de jugement secondaire
Biochemical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer (FET), defined as a positive serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test.
Délai 12-14 days after frozen embryo transfer (FET)
Critère de jugement secondaire
Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer (FET), defined as the presence of a fetal heartbeat confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound.
Délai 5-6 weeks after frozen embryo transfer (FET)
Critère de jugement secondaire
Frequency and intensity of all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and adverse events of special interest) AESI
Délai Baseline to End of Study (up to neonatal follow-up assessment (Visit 11), approximately 10 months after FET)
Critère de jugement secondaire
The incidence of early pregnancy loss, defined as a positive beta-hCG test (biochemical pregnancy) at 12-14 days after FET but no transvaginal ultrasound-confirmed fetal heartbeat at 5-6 weeks after FET (Visit 7)
Délai 5-6 weeks after FET
Dates
| Date de début | 22 juillet 2026 (réelle) |
|---|---|
| Achèvement principal | 31 octobre 2026 (estimée) |
| Achèvement | 30 septembre 2027 (estimée) |
| Première publication | 5 mars 2026 (réelle) |
| Dernière mise à jour | 3 septembre 2026 |
| Résultats publiés | Non précisé dans la fiche du registre |
| Statut vérifié pour la dernière fois | septembre 2026 |
Réelle signifie que l'événement a eu lieu. Estimée signifie que le promoteur s'y attend. Les deux ont un sens différent.
Lieux
2 sites sont en recrutement
United States
| Établissement | Ville | État ou région | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| REACH Fertility | Charlotte | North Carolina | Pas encore en recrutement |
| Delta Hy Research LLC / Advanced Fertility Texas | Houston | Texas | En recrutement |
| Boston IVF | Waltham | Massachusetts | Pas encore en recrutement |
| Cypress Medical Research Centre | Wichita | Kansas | En recrutement |
Documents de l'étude
Aucun document n'est lié dans cette fiche du registre.
Évolution au fil du temps
- 3 septembre 2026
Statut modifié
Status changed from Not yet recruiting to Recruiting
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGRECRUITING
- 3 septembre 2026
Recrutement ouvert
Recruitment opened
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGRECRUITING
- 3 septembre 2026
Site ajouté
3 sites added (4 total)
14