NCT07619131ClinicalTrials.gov
A Phase III Study to Assess the Effect of FDC Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin Compared With Laroprovstat, Rosuvastatin and Placebo on LDL-C in LLT-naïve Patients.
A Phase III Randomised, Double-Blind, Factorial Design Study to Assess the Effect of Fixed Dose Combination Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin Compared With Laroprovstat, Rosuvastatin, and Placebo on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Lipid-Lowering Treatment-Naïve Patients
En bref
This is a study to evaluate the effect on LDL-C and the safety and tolerability of FDC laroprovstat/rosuvastatin in LLT-naïve patients. Laroprovstat is a small molecule that reduces the amount of LDL-C in the blood. Laroprovstat and FDC laroprovstat/rosuvastatin are…
Phase 3600 participants recherchés152 sites11 pays
Catégories
Enregistré dans 1 registre
- ClinicalTrials.govNCT07619131Ouvrir cette fiche sur ClinicalTrials.govSynchronisé il y a 2 semaines
Une même étude peut être enregistrée dans plusieurs registres. Nous l'affichons une seule fois et renvoyons vers chaque fiche que nous détenons.
Les informations de l'essai sont affichées telles que publiées par le registre, dans leur langue d'origine.
Cette étude vous intéresse ?
Se connecter ou créez un compte pour manifester votre intérêt et suivre cette étude.
How this study is set up
The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.
- Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2026-06-01; recorded start 2026-08-12
- Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
- Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
- Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
- Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
- Present: Uses blinding (masking)A masking level is recorded in the record
- Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
- Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
- Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
- Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
- Present: Sponsor has 1019 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (AstraZeneca)
- Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
- The record lists 1 condition.
- Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
- Intervention regulatory context: investigational, within a phased regulatory pathway.
Trial stature
Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.
A strong methodological design for a phase 3 study, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.
How this score is built
- Randomised allocation20/20
Participants are randomly allocated between arms
- Blinding20/20
Quadruple-blind
- Control arm15/15
Active-comparator control arm
- Primary-outcome specificity10/10
Named primary outcome with a defined time frame
- Endpoint type3/10
Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)
- Multi-centre0/8
Single site, or site count not stated
- Data monitoring committee0/7
No data monitoring committee stated
- Prospective registration5/5
Registered before the study start date
- Protocol / SAP posted0/5
No protocol or SAP posted to the registry
A medium-sized study, international in scope: 600 participants (target), run at 152 sites, across 11 countries.
How this score is built
- Enrolment27/40
600 participants (target)
- Site count0/25
Site count not stated in the record
- Country count0/15
Country count not stated in the record
- Planned duration5/10
Planned over about 12 months
- Sponsor scale10/10
AstraZeneca has led 1,005 trials in our corpus
We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.
How this score is built
- Investigator standing0/100
No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial
These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.
Résumé
This is a study to evaluate the effect on LDL-C and the safety and tolerability of FDC laroprovstat/rosuvastatin in LLT-naïve patients. Laroprovstat is a small molecule that reduces the amount of LDL-C in the blood. Laroprovstat and FDC laroprovstat/rosuvastatin are being developed for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia.
Affections
- Hypercholesterolaemia
Éligibilité
| Sexe | Tous |
|---|---|
| Âges | 18 Years – 130 Years |
| Volontaires sains | Non |
Éligibilité telle qu'elle figure dans le registre
Éligibilité en énoncés simples
Les critères de cette fiche n'ont pas encore été décomposés en énoncés distincts. Le texte du registre ci-dessus est complet et fait foi.
Conception de l'étude
| Type d'étude | Interventionnelle |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 3 |
| Répartition | Randomisée |
| Modèle d'intervention | FACTORIAL |
| Objectif principal | TREATMENT |
| Insu | QUADRUPLE (4) |
| Recrutement | 600 participants recherchés |
Promoteur et collaborateurs
- AstraZeneca Promoteur
Groupes et interventions
- LaroprovstatACTIVE_COMPARATOR
The patient will receive a daily dose of Laroprovstat
- PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATOR
The patient will receive a daily dose of Placebo
- Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin dose combination 1EXPERIMENTAL
The patient will receive a daily dose of Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin 1
- Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin dose combination 2EXPERIMENTAL
The patient will receive a daily dose of Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin 2
- Rosuvastatin dose 1ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
The patient will receive a daily dose of Rosuvastatin 1
- Rosuvastatin dose 2ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
The patient will receive a daily dose of Rosuvastatin 2
Interventions
- Médicament Laroprovstat
daily oral dose of the Laroprovstat
- Médicament Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin 1
daily oral dose of the Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin 1
- Médicament Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin 2
daily oral dose of the Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin 2
- Médicament Placebo to match Laroprovstat and Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin 1
daily oral dose of the Placebo to match Laroprovstat and Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin 1
- Médicament Placebo to match Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin 2
daily oral dose of the Placebo to match Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin 2
- Médicament Placebo to match rosuvastatin
daily oral dose of the Placebo to match Rosuvastatin
- Médicament Rosuvastatin 1
daily oral dose of the Rosuvastatin 1
- Médicament Rosuvastatin 2
daily oral dose of the Rosuvastatin 2
Critères de jugement
Critère de jugement principal
Relative change in LDL-C at 8 weeks
To compare the effect of treatment with FDC laroprovstat/rosuvastatin 2 versus the following on LDL-C at 8 weeks: * Placebo * Rosuvastatin 2 * Laroprovstat
Délai 8 weeks
Critère de jugement principal
Relative change in LDL-C at 8 weeks
To compare the effect of treatment with FDC laroprovstat/rosuvastatin 1 versus the following on LDL-C at 8 weeks: * Placebo * Rosuvastatin 1 * Laroprovstat
Délai 8 weeks
Critère de jugement secondaire
Relative change in LDL-C
To compare the effect of treatment with FDC laroprovstat/rosuvastatin 1 versus rosuvastatin 2 alone on LDL-C at 8 weeks
Délai 8 weeks
Critère de jugement secondaire
Relative change in Apo B
To compare the effect of treatment with FDC laroprovstat/rosuvastatin versus the individual components and placebo on apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at 8 weeks
Délai 8 weeks
Critère de jugement secondaire
Relative change in non-HDL-C
To compare the effect of treatment with FDC laroprovstat/rosuvastatin versus the individual components and placebo on non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) at 8 weeks
Délai 8 weeks
Critère de jugement secondaire
Relative change in total cholesterol
To compare the effect of treatment with FDC laroprovstat/rosuvastatin versus the individual components and placebo on total cholesterol at 8 weeks
Délai 8 weeks
Dates
| Date de début | 12 août 2026 (réelle) |
|---|---|
| Achèvement principal | 30 juillet 2027 (estimée) |
| Achèvement | 30 juillet 2027 (estimée) |
| Première publication | 1 juin 2026 (réelle) |
| Dernière mise à jour | 10 septembre 2026 |
| Résultats publiés | Non précisé dans la fiche du registre |
| Statut vérifié pour la dernière fois | septembre 2026 |
Réelle signifie que l'événement a eu lieu. Estimée signifie que le promoteur s'y attend. Les deux ont un sens différent.
Lieux
12 sites sont en recrutement
Bulgaria
| Établissement | Ville | État ou région | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Burgas | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Plovdiv | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Razgrad | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Sevlievo | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Sofia | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Sofia | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Sofia | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Varna | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Veliko Tarnovo | Pas encore en recrutement |
Canada
| Établissement | Ville | État ou région | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Chicoutimi | Quebec | Pas encore en recrutement |
| Research Site | Hamilton | Ontario | En recrutement |
| Research Site | Scarborough Village | Ontario | En recrutement |
| Research Site | Sherbrooke | Quebec | En recrutement |
| Research Site | Stouffville | Ontario | En recrutement |
| Research Site | Victoriaville | Quebec | Pas encore en recrutement |
Denmark
| Établissement | Ville | État ou région | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Aarhus | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Copenhagen | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Gandrup | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Herlev | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Herning | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Svendborg | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Vejle | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Viborg | Pas encore en recrutement |
Germany
| Établissement | Ville | État ou région | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Ahrensburg | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Berlin | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Bochum | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Gladbeck | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Hamburg | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Hanover | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Karlsruhe | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Leipzig | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Löhne | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Magdeburg | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Obertshausen | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Wiesbaden | Pas encore en recrutement |
Hungary
| Établissement | Ville | État ou région | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Budapest | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Budapest | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Budapest | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Kaposvár | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Zalaegerszeg | Pas encore en recrutement |
Israel
| Établissement | Ville | État ou région | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Haifa | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Jerusalem | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Jerusalem | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Kfar Saba | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Petah Tikva | Pas encore en recrutement |
Poland
| Établissement | Ville | État ou région | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Częstochowa | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Gdynia | Suspendu | |
| Research Site | Katowice | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Lodz | Pas encore en recrutement | |
| Research Site | Lodz | Suspendu |
102 sites supplémentaires sont indiqués dans la fiche du registre.
Documents de l'étude
Aucun document n'est lié dans cette fiche du registre.
Évolution au fil du temps
- 10 septembre 2026
Statut modifié
Status changed from Not yet recruiting to Recruiting
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGRECRUITING
- 10 septembre 2026
Recrutement ouvert
Recruitment opened
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGRECRUITING
- 10 septembre 2026
Site ajouté
152 sites added (152 total)
0152