דילוג לתוכן הראשי
xMedica

NCT05624996ClinicalTrials.gov

Testing the Addition of High Dose, Targeted Radiation to the Usual Treatment for Locally-Advanced Inoperable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial of Primary Lung Tumor Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Followed by Concurrent Mediastinal Chemoradiation for Locally-Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

מגייסמקבל משתתפים כעת, לפי רשומת המרשם.
יצירת קשר עם המחקר

בקצרה

This phase III trial compares the effect of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the usual treatment (conventional image guided radiation therapy \[IGRT\] and chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy with durvalumab or targeted therapy with osimertinib) versus the usual treatment…

שלב 3דרושים 474 משתתפים477 אתרים2 מדינות

קטגוריות

רשום במרשם אחד

מחקר יחיד יכול להיות רשום בכמה מרשמים. אנו מציגים אותו פעם אחת ומקשרים לכל רשומה שברשותנו.

מידע הניסוי מוצג כפי שפורסם על ידי המרשם, בשפת המקור שלו.

מתעניינים במחקר הזה?

התחברות או צרו חשבון כדי לרשום את התעניינותכם ולעקוב אחר המחקר הזה.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2022-11-22; recorded start 2023-07-12
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
  • Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
  • Not stated: Open label (no blinding)Masking is recorded as none (open label)
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 49 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (NRG Oncology)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 3 conditions.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: other.
  • Intervention regulatory context: investigational, within a phased regulatory pathway.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourSTRONG

A strong methodological design for a phase 3 study, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation20/20

    Participants are randomly allocated between arms

  • Blinding0/20

    Open-label

  • Control arm15/15

    Active-comparator control arm

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type10/10

    Mortality / MACE endpoint (hard clinical outcome)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 477 sites

  • Data monitoring committee0/7

    No data monitoring committee stated

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleMEDIUM

A medium-sized study, international in scope: 474 participants (target), run at 477 sites, across 2 countries.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment26/40

    474 participants (target)

  • Site count25/25

    477 sites

  • Country count7/15

    2 countries

  • Planned duration10/10

    Planned over about 101 months

  • Sponsor scale6/10

    NRG Oncology has led 49 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

תקציר

This phase III trial compares the effect of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the usual treatment (conventional image guided radiation therapy \[IGRT\] and chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy with durvalumab or targeted therapy with osimertinib) versus the usual treatment alone in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced) and cannot be treated by surgery (inoperable). SBRT uses special equipment to position a patient and deliver radiation therapy to tumors with high precision. This method may kill tumor cells with fewer doses over a shorter period and cause less damage to normal tissue. IGRT is a type of radiation therapy that creates a picture of the tumor to help guide the radiation beam during therapy, making it more accurate and causing less damage to healthy tissue. Usual chemotherapy used in this trial consists of combinations of the following drugs: cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, pemetrexed, and etoposide. Cisplatin and carboplatin are in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. Cisplatin works by killing, stopping, or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Carboplatin works in a way similar to the anticancer drug cisplatin but may be better tolerated than cisplatin. Carboplatin works by killing, stopping, or slowing the growth of tumor cells as well. Paclitaxel is in a class of medications called antimicrotubule agents. It works by stopping the growth and spread of tumor cells. Nab-paclitaxel is an albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel which may have fewer side effects and work better than other forms of paclitaxel. Pemetrexed is in a class of medications called antifolate antineoplastic agents. It works by blocking the action of a certain substance in the body that may help tumor cells multiply. Etoposide is in a class of medications known as podophyllotoxin derivatives. It blocks a certain enzyme needed for cell division and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair and may kill tumor cells. Immunotherapy with durvalumab can induce changes in the body's immune system and can interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Osimertinib is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It works by blocking the action of a protein called EGFR that signals cancer cells to multiply. This helps slow or stop the spread of tumor cells. Adding SBRT to the usual treatment of IGRT with chemotherapy and immunotherapy may be more effective at treating patients with locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer than giving the usual treatment alone.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the overall survival in patients with stage II-IIIC inoperable node-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after image guided, motion-managed conventional radiotherapy to the primary tumor and nodal metastases (Arm 1) or after image guided, motion-managed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary tumor followed by conventionally fractionated radiotherapy to nodal metastases (Arm 2) both given with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. II. To compare progression-free survival between the experimental arm (Arm 2) and control arm (Arm 1). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare objective response rate (as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] version \[v\] 1.1) between the experimental arm and control arm. II. To compare the rate of local control between the experimental arm and control arm. III. To compare patterns of failure (primary, locoregional, or distant) between the experimental arm and control arm. IV. To compare changes in pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second \[FEV1\] and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide \[DLCO\] assessed at randomization and at 6- and 12- months following completion of radiation therapy) between the experimental arm and control arm. V. To compare changes in quality of life and patient-reported outcomes assessed from pre-treatment to 3 months following radiation therapy of each treatment arm. VI. To determine acute and late toxicity profiles of each treatment arm as measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To characterize and compare longitudinal quality of life and patient-reported outcomes of each treatment arm. II. To collect biospecimens at baseline, after SBRT (for Arm 2 patients), during last 2 weeks of chemoradiation, and after first dose of consolidation therapy, to allow for future analyses. III. To collect 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) planning scans and radiation dose to calculate regional lung ventilation and explore pre-treatment 4D-CT based ventilation to predict pulmonary toxicity. IV. To characterize clinical outcomes, toxicities and changes in pulmonary function and quality of life among patients receiving proton and photon radiotherapy. V. To develop and characterize a machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithm for radiotherapy planning and/or quality assurance. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo conventional IGRT and receive usual care chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel intravenously (IV) followed by carboplatin IV weekly (Q7D) during radiotherapy or pemetrexed IV followed by carboplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy or etoposide IV on days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33 followed by cisplatin IV on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 or pemetrexed IV followed by cisplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy. Patients then receive consolidation durvalumab IV every 2 or 4 weeks for up to one year or osimertinib orally (PO) once daily (QD) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and/or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT during follow-up. ARM II: Patients undergo SBRT and conventional IGRT and then receive standard-of-care chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel IV followed by carboplatin IV Q7D during radiotherapy or pemetrexed IV followed by carboplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy or etoposide IV on days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33 followed by cisplatin IV on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 or pemetrexed IV followed by cisplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy. Patients then receive consolidation durvalumab IV every 2 or 4 weeks for up to one year or osimertinib PO QD in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and/or PET/CT during follow-up. Patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months during years 2 and 3, and then yearly after that for the duration of the study.

מצבים רפואיים

  • Locally Advanced Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma
  • Stage IIB Lung Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage III Lung Cancer AJCC v8

זכאות

זכאות
מיןהכול
גילאים18 Yearsללא מקסימום
מתנדבים בריאיםלא

זכאות כפי שנכתבה במרשם

Inclusion Criteria: * Pathologically (histologically or cytologically) proven diagnosis of non-operable stage IIB or III, node positive (American Joint Committee on Cancer \[AJCC\] eighth edition) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with known PD-L1 status prior to registration * Patients must have an identified primary tumor and at least one nodal metastasis (peribronchial/hilar/intrapulmonary, mediastinal/subcarinal, supraclavicular/scalene) * Up to 4 cycles of systemic therapy received prior to registration for the current study cancer is allowable; any prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is also permissible * Patients who refuse surgery, in addition to those who are technically unresectable or medically inoperable, are eligible. * Patients with separate tumor nodules in the same lobe of the primary tumor are eligible * The patient must be deemed clinically appropriate for curative intent definitive combined modality therapy, based on the following staging assessments: * History/physical examination prior to registration; * Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the brain (preferred) or CT scan of the brain (if available, contrast is preferred for all neuroimaging) prior to registration; * CT chest with IV contrast (if contrast is available and unless contraindicated, such as for abnormal kidney function) prior to registration. PET/CT may be used if the CT portion is of identical diagnostic quality as achieved in a stand-alone CT * No evidence of distant metastases based on FDG PET/CT scan obtained within 60 days of registration * Primary tumor =\< 7 cm * Age \>= 18 * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 * Hematologic function (e.g. platelets, leukocytes, hemoglobin) amenable, at the discretion of the treating physician, to allow for treatment with chemotherapy and concurrent radiation therapy * Creatinine clearance \>= 25 mL/min by the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) equation * Subjects with non-malignant pleural effusion are eligible provided the effusion is not known or demonstrated to be an exudative effusion * If a pleural effusion is present, the following criteria must be met to exclude malignant involvement: * When pleural fluid is visible on both the CT scan and on a chest x-ray, a pleuracentesis is required to confirm that the pleural fluid is cytologically negative; * Effusions that are minimal (i.e., not visible on chest x-ray) that are too small to safely tap are eligible * Medical history consistent with the patient being amenable, at the discretion of the treating physician, to allow for treating with consolidation immunotherapy. Patients with known EGFR/ALK/other driver mutation at the time of registration are eligible, and these patients can be treated with consolidation systemic therapy at the discretion of the treating physician * Patients with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment does not have the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen * Negative pregnancy test =\< 14 days prior to registration for participants of childbearing potential * The patient or a legally authorized representative must provide study-specific informed consent prior to study entry and, for patients treated in the United States (U.S.), authorization permitting release of personal health information Exclusion Criteria: * Prior radiotherapy to the study cancer (local recurrence). Prior radiotherapy for a different cancer/condition to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields that is determined by the treating physician to impede the treatment of the study malignancy * Patients without identifiable primary tumor and at least 1 pathologically enlarged lymph node are not eligible (T3-4N0 or T0N1-3 patients are not eligible). At least 1 radiographically-involved lymph node is required, but pathologic confirmation of involvement is not mandated * Centrally located primary tumor \< 2 cm from involved nodal disease that would result in significant overlap of the primary SBRT and nodal radiation fields. This does not include proximity to involved segmental and subsegmental lymph nodes (levels 13 and 14) that would not result in overlap of dose to the proximal bronchial tree or esophagus. Centrally located is defined as within or touching the zone of the proximal bronchial tree, which is a volume 2 cm in all directions around the proximal bronchial tree (carina, right and left main bronchi, right and left upper lobe bronchi, intermedius bronchus, right middle lobe bronchus, lingular bronchus right and left lower lobe bronchi) * Participants who are pregnant or unwilling to discontinue nursing * Participants of childbearing potential (participants who may become pregnant or who may impregnate a partner) unwilling to use highly effective contraceptives during therapy and for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-labeled contraception timeframe required after the final dose of the selected systemic therapy regimen, because the treatment in this study may be significantly teratogenic

זכאות במשפטים פשוטים

הקריטריונים של רשומה זו טרם פורקו למשפטים נפרדים. טקסט המרשם שלמעלה שלם והוא הגרסה המחייבת.

תכנון המחקר

תכנון המחקר
סוג המחקרהתערבותי
שלבשלב 3
הקצאהאקראי
מודל ההתערבותPARALLEL
מטרה ראשיתTREATMENT
הסתרהNONE (0)
גיוסדרושים 474 משתתפים

נותן חסות ושותפים

  • NRG Oncology נותן חסות

זרועות והתערבויות

  • Arm I (image guided RT, chemotherapy, immunotherapy)ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

    Patients undergo conventional IGRT and receive usual care chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel IV followed by carboplatin IV Q7D during radiotherapy or pemetrexed IV followed by carboplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy or etoposide IV on days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33 followed by cisplatin IV on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 or pemetrexed IV followed by cisplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy. Patients then receive consolidation durvalumab IV every 2 or 4 weeks for up to one year or osimertinib PO QD in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and/or PET/CT during follow-up.

  • Arm II (SBRT, image guided RT, chemotherapy, immunotherapy)EXPERIMENTAL

    Patients undergo SBRT and conventional IGRT and then receive standard-of-care chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel IV followed by carboplatin IV Q7D during radiotherapy or pemetrexed IV followed by carboplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy or etoposide IV on days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33 followed by cisplatin IV on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 or pemetrexed IV followed by cisplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy. Patients then receive consolidation durvalumab IV every 2 or 4 weeks for up to one year or osimertinib PO QD in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and/or PET/CT during follow-up.

התערבויות

  • תרופה Carboplatin

    Given IV

  • תרופה Cisplatin

    Given IV

  • פרוצדורה Computed Tomography

    Undergo CT and/or PET/CT

  • ביולוגי Durvalumab

    Given IV

  • תרופה Etoposide

    Given IV

  • קרינה Image Guided Radiation Therapy

    Undergo IGRT

  • תרופה Nab-paclitaxel

    Given IV

  • תרופה Osimertinib

    Given PO

  • תרופה Paclitaxel

    Given IV

  • תרופה Pemetrexed

    Given IV

  • פרוצדורה Positron Emission Tomography

    Undergo PET/CT

  • אחר Questionnaire Administration

    Ancillary studies

  • קרינה Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

    Undergo SBRT

מדדי תוצאה

  1. מדד תוצאה ראשוני

    Overall survival (OS)

    Non-inferiority (NI) between arm 2 and arm 1 (reference level) will be evaluated by comparing the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio to the pre-specified NI margin. NI of arm 2 will be concluded if the upper bound of the confidence interval is equal to, or falls below, the pre-specified margin at the final analysis. When evaluating the NI of arm 2 in OS, a Cox proportional hazards (PH) model stratified by stratification factors will be used to compute the hazard ratio and associated 95% confidence interval (CI). OS rates will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. If the NI of arm 2 in OS is demonstrated, the superiority of arm 1 in OS will be tested at 1-sided significance level of 0.025 using a stratified log-rank test by adjusting for stratification factors.

    מסגרת זמן Time between date of randomization and date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 8 years

  2. מדד תוצאה ראשוני

    Progression-free survival (PFS)

    The PFS analysis will be conducted using the same methods and stratification factors as the OS analysis. The superiority of arm 2 in PFS will be tested at 1-sided significance level of 0.025 using a stratified log-rank test by adjusting for stratification factors. In the event that the NI of OS is not established, statistical inference of PFS will be considered exploratory in nature only. A Cox PH model stratified by stratification factors will be used to compute the hazard ratio and associated 95% CI.

    מסגרת זמן Time between date of randomization and first date of documented progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 8 years

  3. מדד תוצאה משני

    Objective response rate (ORR)

    ORR (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] 1.1) is defined as the number (%) of patients with at least 1 visit response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and will be based on all randomized patients who have measurable disease. Therefore, data obtained up until progression, or the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression, will be included in the assessment of ORR. The ORR will be compared between arm 2 versus arm 1 using a Fisher's exact test. A binary response variable for ORR will be used for the analysis with the categories of CR and PR versus stable disease, progressive disease and inevaluable.

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  4. מדד תוצאה משני

    Time to progression

    Local control also known as time to progression will be defined as freedom from local progression, in which a failure is defined as intrathoracic tumor progression (failure in the lobe of the primary tumor or mediastinal lymph nodes) by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Local control will be analyzed as competing risks data based on cause-specific hazards approaches, where deaths without local failure will be considered as a competing event and analyzed as "censoring" of local failure. The rates at various timepoints (e.g., every 6 months after randomization) and medians of PFS for each arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The associated 95% CI will be calculated using Greenwood's formula and based on a log-log transformation applied on the survival function. Results from an unstratified analysis will also be provided.

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  5. מדד תוצאה משני

    Time to primary, locoregional, or distant failure

    Competing risks analysis will be used to analyze times to primary failure, locoregional failure and distant failure as the first failure. Competing events include primary failure, locoregional failure, distant failure and deaths without any failures. Rates at various timepoints (i.e., every 6 months after randomization) for each arm will be estimated using the cumulative incidence function. The associated 95% CI will be calculated using the Delta method and based on a log-log transformation applied on the estimated cumulative incidence functions. Statistical inferences of the development of each failure between arms will be based on cause-specific hazards using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model. In addition, Gray's test and the Fine-Gray model will also be used to provide statistical inferences between arms based on cumulative incidence functions and subdistribution hazards.

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  6. מדד תוצאה משני

    Changes in pulmonary function

    Includes forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Changes in pulmonary function (FEV1 and DLCO) will be summarized with descriptive statistics, and compared with Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The descriptive statistics of changes in FEV1 and diffusion capacity before and after treatment will be reported by treatment arm and by response categories (complete response; partial response; stable disease; progressive disease). Linear regression will be used to model changes with adjustment for treatment arms and possibly other baseline covariates, if applicable. The grade 3-5 NRG Oncology Pulmonary Toxicity Scale for changes will be reported with the frequency and grade by arm. Logistic regression will be used to model the distribution of the NRG Oncology Pulmonary Toxicity Scale by arms with and without adjustment for covariates.

    מסגרת זמן From randomization to 6 months or 12 months

  7. מדד תוצאה משני

    Patient reported outcomes-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

    Adverse events will also be assessed using PRO-CTCAE items. The PRO-CTCAE is a patient-reported outcome measurement system developed to characterize the frequency, severity, and interference of symptomatic treatment toxicities. Items are scored on a Likert scale. For each symptom and each domain (i.e., frequency, severity, and interference), counts and frequencies will be summarized for the worst score experienced by the patient by the treatment arm. In addition, a composite grading algorithm (Basch 2021) will be used to derive a single numerical grade for each adverse event scored using PRO-CTCAE. PRO-CTCAE, the frequency of acute grade \>= 3 patient-reported toxicity will be compared to the corresponding rate of clinician-scored toxicity using a chi-square test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Distributions of clinician-reported and patient-reported adverse events will also be compared across study arms.

    מסגרת זמן At 3, 12, and 24 months

  8. מדד תוצאה משני

    Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lung (FACT-L) and Trial Outcome Index (TOI)

    FACT-L and TOI is a measure that sums the functional well-being (FWB - 7 items), physical well-being (PWB - 7), and the lung cancer subscale (LCS - 9 items) of FACT-L. Questionnaire trial outcome index deterioration rates at 3 months and associated 95% confidence interval will be calculated for each treatment group, based on all randomized subjects. In addition, to explore if higher QOL scores will be maintained at 12 and 24 months from the end of radiotherapy as well, longitudinal data analysis will also be performed to characterize the trend of scores over time across the two treatment groups using hierarchical formulation of the linear mixed model. The Clopper-Pearson method will be used for calculating 95% CI. The deterioration rates of each arm will also be compared using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test, stratified by PD-L1 expression and T-stage.

    מסגרת זמן At 3, 12, and 24 months

  9. מדד תוצאה משני

    European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) scale

    Subjects' overall health state on a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) at each assessment time point will be summarized using descriptive statistics by treatment group, as randomized. Proportion of subjects reporting problems for the five EQ-5D dimensions at each assessment time point will be summarized by level of problem and by treatment group, as randomized. Percentages will be based on number subjects assessed at assessment time point.

    מסגרת זמן At 3, 12, and 24 months

  10. מדד תוצאה משני

    Incidence of adverse events

    For each patient, the maximum severity reported will be used in the summaries. Adverse events will be summarized regardless of relationship to protocol treatment as assessed by the investigator. Treatment-related adverse events using National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) will be presented in statistical analysis reports/publications in CTCAE version 5. Adverse event rates will be reported with the frequency and severity (e.g., type, grade, and attribution) by arm.

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  11. מדד תוצאה אחר

    Clinical outcomes

    Descriptive analyses will be reported, based on corresponding analysis plans within patients who actually receive proton and photon radiotherapy (e.g., per-protocol population), respectively.

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  12. מדד תוצאה אחר

    Functional mean lung dose

    Collection of 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) planning CTs and calculation of radiation dose to regional lung ventilation will be performed among randomized patients with 4D CT planning CTs. To evaluate functional dose metrics, ventilation maps will be registered to the average 4DCT reference frame. Functional dose metrics and standard dose metrics will be calculated and evaluated. Functional mean lung dose will be defined as the mean dose delivered to functional lung. Dose to total lung and dose to functional lung will then be correlated with pulmonary toxicity including grade 2 or higher radiation pneumonitis or any grade 3 or higher cough, dyspnea, hypoxia or respiratory failure. Logistic regression models will be used to explore the correlation between pulmonary toxicity and functional mean lung dose.

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  13. מדד תוצאה אחר

    Incidence of toxicities

    Descriptive analyses will be reported, based on corresponding analysis plans within patients who actually receive proton and photon radiotherapy (e.g., per-protocol population), respectively.

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  14. מדד תוצאה אחר

    Changes in pulmonary function

    Descriptive analyses will be reported, based on corresponding analysis plans within patients who actually receive proton and photon radiotherapy (e.g., per-protocol population), respectively.

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  15. מדד תוצאה אחר

    Changes in quality of life

    Descriptive analyses will be reported, based on corresponding analysis plans within patients who actually receive proton and photon radiotherapy (e.g., per-protocol population), respectively.

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  16. מדד תוצאה אחר

    Development and characterization of a machine learning/artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for radiotherapy planning and/or quality assurance

    Assessment will focus on four key areas: tumor volume contouring score, organs-at-risk contouring score, tumor volume dose-volume analysis score, and organs-at-risk dose-volume analysis score. Each area will be scored as per protocol: acceptable variation, unacceptable variation, or not evaluable. Cases deemed not evaluable will be considered as such, regardless of the reviewer. The scores generated by the AI algorithm will be compared with those from radiation oncologists, ensuring the AI algorithm adheres to the contours. The sensitivity of the AI algorithm, indicating its ability to detect deviations from the protocol, will be calculated. The AI algorithm will be refined until its sensitivity exceeds 95%. Inter-rater reliability between the AI algorithm and the radiation oncologists will be assessed using Cohen's κ. Concordance and discordance frequencies will also be recorded.

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  17. מדד תוצאה אחר

    Treatment effect and confidence intervals by sex

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  18. מדד תוצאה אחר

    Treatment effect and confidence intervals by race

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

  19. מדד תוצאה אחר

    Treatment effect and confidence intervals by ethnicity

    מסגרת זמן Up to 8 years

תאריכים

תאריכים
תאריך התחלה12 ביולי 2023 (בפועל)
סיום ראשוני15 באוקטובר 2031 (משוער)
סיום15 באוקטובר 2036 (משוער)
פורסם לראשונה22 בנובמבר 2022 (בפועל)
עודכן לאחרונה17 באוגוסט 2026
התוצאות פורסמולא צוין ברשומת המרשם
המצב אומת לאחרונהאוגוסט 2026

בפועל פירושו שהאירוע התרחש. משוער פירושו שנותן החסות צופה אותו. שתי המשמעויות שונות זו מזו.

מיקומים

446 אתרים מגייסים

Canada

Canada
מתקןעירמדינה או אזורמצב
Ottawa Hospital and Cancer Center-General CampusOttawaOntarioמושהה

United States

United States
מתקןעירמדינה או אזורמצב
Cleveland Clinic Akron GeneralAkronOhioמגייס
Atrium Health Stanly/LCI-AlbemarleAlbemarleNorth Carolinaמגייס
Presbyterian Kaseman HospitalAlbuquerqueNew Mexicoפעיל, ללא גיוס
University of New Mexico Cancer CenterAlbuquerqueNew Mexicoמגייס
Alton Memorial HospitalAltonIllinoisפעיל, ללא גיוס
Mary Greeley Medical CenterAmesIowaמגייס
McFarland Clinic - AmesAmesIowaמגייס
UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - Ankeny ClinicAnkenyIowaמגייס
Trinity Health Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann ArborAnn ArborMichiganמגייס
Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical CenterAnnapolisMarylandפעיל, ללא גיוס
Langlade Hospital and Cancer CenterAntigoWisconsinמגייס
Northwest Wisconsin Cancer CenterAshlandWisconsinמגייס
Duluth Clinic AshlandAshlandWisconsinמגייס
Emory Saint Joseph's HospitalAtlantaGeorgiaמגייס
Grady Health SystemAtlantaGeorgiaמגייס
Emory Proton Therapy CenterAtlantaGeorgiaמגייס
Emory University Hospital MidtownAtlantaGeorgiaמגייס
Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer InstituteAtlantaGeorgiaמגייס
Augusta University Medical CenterAugustaGeorgiaמגייס
UCHealth University of Colorado HospitalAuroraColoradoמגייס
Rush-Copley Medical CenterAuroraIllinoisמגייס
Advocate Outpatient Center - AuroraAuroraIllinoisמגייס
WellStar Cobb HospitalAustellGeorgiaמגייס
UH Seidman Cancer Center at UH Avon Health CenterAvonOhioמגייס
AIS Cancer Center at San Joaquin Community HospitalBakersfieldCaliforniaמגייס
Sinai Hospital of BaltimoreBaltimoreMarylandמגייס
Greater Baltimore Medical CenterBaltimoreMarylandמגייס
Advocate Good Shepherd HospitalBarringtonIllinoisמגייס
Memorial Sloan Kettering Basking RidgeBasking RidgeNew Jerseyמגייס
Wilmot Cancer Center at BataviaBataviaNew Yorkמושהה
McLaren Cancer Institute-Bay CityBay CityMichiganמגייס
Bay Pines VA Healthcare SystemBay PinesFloridaמגייס
Northwell Health Imbert Cancer CenterBay ShoreNew Yorkמגייס
UHHS-Chagrin Highlands Medical CenterBeachwoodOhioמגייס
Sanford Joe Lueken Cancer CenterBemidjiMinnesotaמגייס
Central Vermont Medical Center/National Life Cancer TreatmentBerlin CornersVermontמגייס
Billings Clinic Cancer CenterBillingsMontanaמגייס
The Kirklin Clinic at Acton RoadBirminghamAlabamaמגייס
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer CenterBirminghamAlabamaמגייס
Sanford Bismarck Medical CenterBismarckNorth Dakotaמגייס
OSF Saint Joseph Medical CenterBloomingtonIllinoisמגייס
Illinois CancerCare-BloomingtonBloomingtonIllinoisמגייס
Saint Joseph's/Candler - Bluffton CampusBlufftonSouth Carolinaמגייס
Bozeman Health Deaconess HospitalBozemanMontanaמגייס
Essentia Health Saint Joseph's Medical CenterBrainerdMinnesotaמגייס
Trinity Health IHA Medical Group Hematology Oncology - BrightonBrightonMichiganמגייס
Trinity Health Medical Center - BrightonBrightonMichiganמגייס
Henry Ford Cancer Institute-DownriverBrownstownMichiganמגייס
Mills-Peninsula Medical CenterBurlingameCaliforniaמגייס

427 אתרים נוספים מצוינים ברשומת המרשם.

מסמכי המחקר

לא צורפו מסמכים ברשומת מרשם זו.

שינויים לאורך זמן

לא נרשמו שינויים מאז שקלטנו רשומה זו לראשונה.

שינוי נרשם בכל פעם שנותן החסות מעדכן את רשומת המרשם. מצב, תאריכים, גיוס ואתרים מופיעים כאן ככל שהם משתנים.