Vai al contenuto principale
xMedica

NCT05812807ClinicalTrials.gov

Pembrolizumab vs. Observation in People With Triple-negative Breast Cancer Who Had a Pathologic Complete Response After Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab

OptimICE-PCR: De-Escalation of Therapy in Early-Stage TNBC Patients Who Achieve pCR After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

In reclutamentoAccetta partecipanti ora, secondo la scheda del registro.
Contatta questo studio

In breve

This phase III trial compares the effect of continuation of treatment with pembrolizumab (usual approach) to observation only at preventing cancer from coming back in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who achieved a pathologic complete response after preoperative…

Fase 31295 partecipanti ricercati846 centri3 paesi

Categorie

Registrato in 1 registro

Uno studio può essere registrato in più registri. Lo mostriamo una volta sola e colleghiamo ogni scheda in nostro possesso.

Le informazioni sulla sperimentazione sono mostrate così come pubblicate dal registro, nella lingua originale.

Ti interessa questo studio?

Accedi oppure crea un account per registrare il tuo interesse e seguire questo studio.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2023-04-14; recorded start 2023-06-14
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
  • Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
  • Not stated: Open label (no blinding)Masking is recorded as none (open label)
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Not stated: The record mentions a possible cost to participantsParsed from the study record (summary, description or eligibility text)
    To compare patient out-of-pocket costs at approximately 27 weeks between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation.
  • Present: Sponsor has 95 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 4 conditions.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: other.
  • Intervention regulatory context: investigational, within a phased regulatory pathway.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourSTRONG

A strong methodological design for a phase 3 study, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation20/20

    Participants are randomly allocated between arms

  • Blinding0/20

    Open-label

  • Control arm15/15

    Active-comparator control arm

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type10/10

    Mortality / MACE endpoint (hard clinical outcome)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 842 sites

  • Data monitoring committee0/7

    No data monitoring committee stated

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleLARGE

A large study, international in scope: 1,295 participants (target), run at 846 sites, across 3 countries.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment31/40

    1,295 participants (target)

  • Site count25/25

    842 sites

  • Country count7/15

    3 countries

  • Planned duration10/10

    Planned over about 121 months

  • Sponsor scale7/10

    Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology has led 96 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Sintesi

This phase III trial compares the effect of continuation of treatment with pembrolizumab (usual approach) to observation only at preventing cancer from coming back in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who achieved a pathologic complete response after preoperative chemotherapy in combination with pembrolizumab. The usual approach for patients with early-stage TNBC who receive preoperative chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab is to continue to receive pembrolizumab for up to 27 weeks after surgery. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. This trial may help researchers determine if observation is as good as receiving pembrolizumab for 27 weeks after surgery in triple-negative breast cancer patients who achieved a pathologic complete response after preoperative treatment with chemotherapy and pembrolizumab.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate whether observation results in a non-inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to adjuvant pembrolizumab in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients who achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pembrolizumab. II. To compare quality of life (QOL) at approximately 27 weeks as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) Trial Outcome Index between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Quality of Life) III. To assess the social value of de-escalation of adjuvant breast cancer immunotherapy at approximately 27 weeks and, by modeling, over a lifetime. (Value of Care) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate whether observation compared to adjuvant pembrolizumab impacts the following: Ia. RFS by stage at presentation and by receipt of prior anthracycline therapy; Ib. Adverse event rate: difference in Grade 3 or higher adverse event rates overall and Grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events (irAEs) rates; Ic. Overall Survival (OS); Id. Locoregional recurrence (LRR both isolated LRR as first events and LRR events simultaneous with distant metastases \[DM\]); Ie. RFS, LRR, OS, adverse events, and QOL by age (=\< 45, 46-65, and \> 65), race, and ethnicity; If. Adverse events related to receipt of radiotherapy. II. To assess the value of de-escalation of breast cancer immunotherapy from the payer perspective at approximately 27 weeks and, by modelling, over a lifetime. (Value of Care) III. To compare patient out-of-pocket costs at approximately 27 weeks between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Value of Care) IV. To compare financial toxicity at approximately 27 weeks between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Value of Care) V. To compare work/productivity impairment at approximately 27 weeks between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Value of Care) EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To describe trajectories of QOL over time among patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus (vs.) observation. (Quality of Life) II. To compare various QOL domains after approximately 27 weeks as assessed by the 5 subscales of the FACT-B Index between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Quality of Life) III. To compare self-reported symptomatic adverse events at approximately 27 weeks assessed by the patient reported outcome Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) between patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Quality of Life) IV. To describe trajectories of financial toxicity and work/productivity impairment over time from baseline to approximately 27 weeks among patients randomized to adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation. (Value of Care) V. To develop and assess a measure of value from the patient perspective at approximately 27 weeks. (Value of Care) OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with pembrolizumab, followed by definitive breast surgery. ARM I (PEMBROLIZUMAB): Patients receive pembrolizumab intravenously (IV) over 25-40 minutes once every 3 weeks (Q3W) or once every 6 weeks (Q6W) for 27 weeks. Patients also undergo tumor biopsy and collection of blood throughout the study. Patients also undergo mammography, breast ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during follow-up. ARM II (OBSERVATION): Patients undergo observation for 27 weeks. Patients also undergo tumor biopsy and collection of blood throughout the study. Patients also undergo mammography, breast ultrasound or MRI during follow-up.

Patologie

  • Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8
  • Early Stage Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma
  • Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
  • Anatomic Stage IIIB Breast Cancer AJCC v8

Idoneità

Idoneità
SessoTutti
Età18 YearsNessun massimo
Volontari saniNo

Idoneità come riportata nel registro

Inclusion Criteria: * Age \>= 18 years * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0-2 * Triple Negative Breast Cancer: * Patients with a history of clinical stage T1cN1-2 or T2-4N0-2 (clinical stage II or III prior to preoperative therapy) breast cancer at time of diagnosis according to the primary tumor-regional lymph node anatomic staging criteria of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), 8th edition as determined by the investigator in radiologic assessment, clinical assessment or both * Patients must have no residual invasive disease in the breast or lymph nodes after the completion of neoadjuvant therapy. Residual ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is allowed. Isolated tumor cells are considered node-negative * Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) =\< 10%; HER2-negative by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines (immunohistochemistry \[IHC\] and fluorescence in situ hybridization \[FISH\]) * If invasive disease was present in both breasts, participation in the study is permitted as long as the eligibility criteria are met for both tumors/breasts * Patients must have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with pembrolizumab for a minimum of 6 cycles. All systemic chemotherapy must have been completed preoperatively * An interval of no more than 12 weeks between the completion date of the final surgery and the date of randomization \* Note: Adjuvant radiation can be given on study, however, it is recommended to complete adjuvant radiation prior to registration. If radiation is given on study, it is encouraged to be given concurrently with pembrolizumab if the patient is on the pembrolizumab arm, per investigator discretion. Treatment with adjuvant pembrolizumab is strongly discouraged prior to participation in this trial, but if administered (e.g., if patients are awaiting pathology results), pembrolizumab may be administered for up to 6 weeks (i.e., up to 2 q3week doses or up to one q6week dose) post-surgery and must be completed prior to registration post-surgery and must be completed prior to registration * Use of investigational anti-cancer agents must be discontinued at time of registration * Adequate excision: Surgical removal of all clinically evident disease in the breast and lymph nodes as follows: * Breast surgery: Total mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery with histologically negative margins, including no ink on tumor for DCIS, at the time of excision \*\* For patients who undergo breast-conserving surgery, the margins of the resected specimen must be histologically free of ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) as determined by the local pathologist. If pathologic examination demonstrates DCIS at the line of resection, additional operative procedures may be performed to obtain clear margins. If DCIS is still present at the resected margin after re-excision(s), the patient must undergo total mastectomy to be eligible. Patients with margins positive for classic lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) are eligible without additional resection * Lymph node surgery: * For a patient with clinically N0 disease, a sentinel lymph node biopsy should have been performed at time of surgical evaluation, and if pathologically node positive, the patient is no longer eligible. Isolated tumor cells are considered node-negative * For a patient with clinically N1 disease at diagnosis (with positive results from a fine-needle aspiration, core biopsy, or sentinel node biopsy performed prior to preoperative therapy) additional surgical evaluation of the axilla following preoperative therapy is required \*\*\* If they become cN0 (no palpable adenopathy), then a sentinel lymph node biopsy could have been performed at time of surgery (axillary dissection would also be permitted); if the sentinel lymph node biopsy is positive, the patient is no longer eligible * If sentinel node biopsy performed before preoperative therapy was negative, no additional surgical evaluation of the axilla is required after preoperative therapy. If sentinel node biopsy performed before preoperative therapy was positive, an ALND is required after preoperative therapy * If the only sentinel node identified by isotope scan is in the internal mammary chain, surgical evaluation of the axilla is still required * If sentinel node evaluation after preoperative therapy is negative, no further additional surgical evaluation of the axilla is required * Axillary dissection without sentinel node evaluation is permitted as the initial or sole axillary evaluation after preoperative therapy * If breast-conserving surgery was performed but patient will not be receiving breast radiation, the patient is not eligible * Not pregnant and not nursing, because this study involves an agent whose genotoxic, mutagenic and teratogenic effects on the developing fetus and newborn are unknown. Therefore, for women of childbearing potential only, a negative serum or urine pregnancy test done =\< 7 days prior to randomization is required * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>= 1,000/mm\^3 * Platelet Count \>= 100,000/mm\^3 * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \>= 15 mL/min/1.73m\^2 * Total Bilirubin =\<1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) \* Patients with Gilbert's disease with a total bilirubin =\< 2.5 x ULN and direct bilirubin within normal limits are permitted * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) serum aspartate aminotransferase \[SGOT\] / alanine aminotransferase (ALT) serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase \[SGPT\] =\< 3 x institutional ULN * Patients must be willing to provide tumor tissue from the diagnostic core biopsy. If inadequate tumor tissue is available, patients are still eligible to participate in the trial * Patients with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment does not have the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen are eligible for this trial * Patients with known history or current symptoms of cardiac disease, or history of treatment with cardiotoxic agents, should have a clinical risk assessment of cardiac function using the New York Heart Association Functional Classification. To be eligible for this trial, patients should be class 2B or better * Patients with known HIV infection who are on effective anti-retroviral therapy with undetectable viral load within 6 months prior to registration are eligible for this trial Exclusion Criteria: * No stage IV (metastatic) breast cancer * No history of any prior (ipsi- or contralateral) invasive breast cancer. Prior DCIS is allowed * No evidence of recurrent disease following preoperative therapy and surgery * No known active liver disease, e.g. due to hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), autoimmune hepatic disorders, or sclerosing cholangitis * No history of intolerance, including Grade 3 or 4 infusion reaction or hypersensitivity to pembrolizumab or murine proteins or any components of the product \* Note: Prior immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are allowed if they resolved to ≤ grade 1 and the patient tolerated subsequent therapy without requiring chronic steroids for the irAE. The following are exceptions to this criterion: Grade 2 or lower immune mediated endocrinopathies due to neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibition but patients are stable on endocrine therapy and were able to continue checkpoint inhibition. * No medical conditions that require chronic systemic steroids (\>10 mg prednisone daily or equivalent) or any other form of immunosuppressive medications and has required such therapy in the last two years. Replacement therapy (e.g. thyroxine, insulin, or physiologic corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal or pituitary insufficiency, etc.) is not considered a form of systemic therapy * Patients who are unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of the protocol per investigator assessment are not eligible

Idoneità in frasi semplici

I criteri di questa scheda non sono ancora stati suddivisi in affermazioni distinte. Il testo del registro qui sopra è completo ed è la versione autorevole.

Disegno dello studio

Disegno dello studio
Tipo di studioInterventistico
FaseFase 3
AssegnazioneRandomizzata
Modello di interventoPARALLEL
Finalità principaleTREATMENT
MascheramentoNONE (0)
Arruolamento1295 partecipanti ricercati

Sponsor e collaboratori

  • Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Sponsor
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI) Collaboratori

Bracci e interventi

  • Arm I (pembrolizumab)ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

    Patients receive pembrolizumab IV over 25-40 minutes Q3W or Q6W for 27 weeks. Patients also undergo tumor biopsy and collection of blood throughout the study. Patients also undergo mammography, breast ultrasound or MRI and during follow-up.

  • Arm II (observation)EXPERIMENTAL

    Patients undergo observation for 27 weeks. Patients also undergo tumor biopsy and collection of blood throughout the study. Patients also undergo mammography, breast ultrasound or MRI during follow-up.

Interventi

  • Procedura Biopsy

    Undergo biopsy

  • Procedura Biospecimen Collection

    Undergo collection of blood

  • Altro Patient Observation

    Undergo observation

  • Biologico Pembrolizumab

    Given IV

  • Altro Quality-of-Life Assessment

    Ancillary studies

  • Altro Questionnaire Administration

    Ancillary studies

Esiti misurati

  1. Esito primario

    Recurrence-free survival (RFS)

    Defined as the time from randomization to first invasive local, regional, or distant recurrence or death due to any cause. RFS will be compared between treatment arms using the hazard ratio (with 90% confidence interval and stratified log-rank test) from a stratified Cox model.

    Orizzonte temporale Up to 10 years.

  2. Esito secondario

    Incidence of adverse events (AEs)

    Adverse events will be determined using the latest version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The proportions of patients with a grade 3 or higher AE will be compared between the arms using a chi-square test. A similar analysis will be done to compare the grade 3 or higher irAE rates

    Orizzonte temporale Up to 27 weeks after registration

  3. Esito secondario

    Overall survival

    Defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. OS will be compared between treatment arms using the hazard ratio (and stratified log-rank test) from a stratified Cox model

    Orizzonte temporale Up to 10 years.

  4. Esito secondario

    Locoregional recurrence incidence

    Defined as the time from randomization to first invasive local or regional recurrence. The cumulative incidence of LRR will be compared between treatment arms using a log-rank test (and estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves).

    Orizzonte temporale Up to 10 years.

  5. Esito secondario

    Radiation adverse events

    Radiation adverse events include pneumonitis, hypothyroidism and dermatitis. Radiation AE event rates will be determined for patients who received radiation. The numerator is the number of patients with the radiation AE and the denominator is the number of patients who received radiation. The analysis of the radiation related adverse event rates will only include patients who received radiation treatment. The radiation AE rates will be compared between the two arms using a chi-square test.

    Orizzonte temporale Up to 27 weeks after registration

Date

Date
Data di inizio14 giugno 2023 (effettiva)
Conclusione primaria31 maggio 2033 (stimata)
Conclusione31 maggio 2033 (stimata)
Prima pubblicazione14 aprile 2023 (effettiva)
Ultimo aggiornamento5 agosto 2026
Risultati pubblicatiNon indicato nella scheda del registro
Stato verificato l'ultima voltaagosto 2026

«Effettiva» significa che l'evento è avvenuto. «Stimata» significa che lo sponsor lo prevede. Le due cose non sono equivalenti.

Centri

797 centri stanno reclutando

Canada

Canada
StrutturaCittàStato o regioneStato
Cambridge Memorial HospitalCambridgeOntarioIn reclutamento
BCCA-Cancer Centre for the Southern InteriorKelownaBritish ColumbiaIn reclutamento
Kingston Health Sciences CentreKingstonOntarioIn reclutamento
London Regional Cancer ProgramLondonOntarioIn reclutamento
Jewish General HospitalMontrealQuebecIn reclutamento
Ottawa Hospital and Cancer Center-General CampusOttawaOntarioIn reclutamento
CHU de Quebec-Hopital du Saint-Sacrement (HSS)QuébecQuebecIn reclutamento
Allan Blair Cancer CentreReginaSaskatchewanIn reclutamento
Atlantic Health Sciences Corporation-Saint John Regional HospitalSaint JohnNew BrunswickIn reclutamento
Saskatoon Cancer CentreSaskatoonSaskatchewanIn reclutamento
Odette Cancer Centre- Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioIn reclutamento
University Health Network-Princess Margaret HospitalTorontoOntarioIn reclutamento
Centre Hospitalier Regional de Trois-RivieresTrois-RivièresQuebecIn reclutamento
BCCA-Vancouver Cancer CentreVancouverBritish ColumbiaIn reclutamento

Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico
StrutturaCittàStato o regioneStato
Doctors Cancer CenterManatiIn reclutamento
PROncologySan JuanIn reclutamento
Centro Comprensivo de Cancer de UPRSan JuanIn reclutamento
San Juan City HospitalSan JuanIn reclutamento

United States

United States
StrutturaCittàStato o regioneStato
Avera Cancer Institute-AberdeenAberdeenSouth DakotaIn reclutamento
Summa Health System - Akron CampusAkronOhioIn reclutamento
Phoebe Putney Memorial HospitalAlbanyGeorgiaSospeso
Atrium Health Stanly/LCI-AlbemarleAlbemarleNorth CarolinaIn reclutamento
University of New Mexico Cancer CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoIn reclutamento
Presbyterian Kaseman HospitalAlbuquerqueNew MexicoIn reclutamento
Lehigh Valley Hospital-Cedar CrestAllentownPennsylvaniaIn reclutamento
AdventHealth AltamonteAltamonte SpringsFloridaAttivo, non in reclutamento
Community Hospital of AnacondaAnacondaMontanaIn reclutamento
Katmai Oncology GroupAnchorageAlaskaIn reclutamento
UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - Ankeny ClinicAnkenyIowaIn reclutamento
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterAnn ArborMichiganIn reclutamento
Trinity Health Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann ArborAnn ArborMichiganIn reclutamento
Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical CenterAnnapolisMarylandIn reclutamento
Aspirus Cancer Care-Antigo-Volm Cancer CenterAntigoWisconsinIn reclutamento
ThedaCare Regional Cancer CenterAppletonWisconsinIn reclutamento
Ascension Northeast Wisconsin-Saint Elizabeth Cancer Center-AppletonAppletonWisconsinIn reclutamento
PCR OncologyArroyo GrandeCaliforniaIn reclutamento
Mission Hope Medical Oncology - Arroyo GrandeArroyo GrandeCaliforniaIn reclutamento
Cone Health MedCenter AsheboroAsheboroNorth CarolinaIn reclutamento
Cone Health Cancer Center at AsheboroAsheboroNorth CarolinaSospeso
Duluth Clinic AshlandAshlandWisconsinIn reclutamento
OhioHealth O'Bleness HospitalAthensOhioIn reclutamento
University Cancer and Blood Center LLCAthensGeorgiaSospeso
Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer InstituteAtlantaGeorgiaIn reclutamento
Emory Saint Joseph's HospitalAtlantaGeorgiaIn reclutamento
Emory University Hospital MidtownAtlantaGeorgiaIn reclutamento
Northside HospitalAtlantaGeorgiaIn reclutamento
Grady Health SystemAtlantaGeorgiaIn reclutamento
Augusta Oncology Associates PC-WheelerAugustaGeorgiaSospeso
Augusta Oncology Associates PC-D'AntignacAugustaGeorgiaSospeso
Rush-Copley Medical CenterAuroraIllinoisIn reclutamento

Nella scheda del registro sono indicati altri 796 centri.

Documenti dello studio

In questa scheda del registro non sono collegati documenti.

Modifiche nel tempo

  1. 5 agosto 2026

    Centro aggiunto

    4 sites added (846 total)

    842846