Vai al contenuto principale
xMedica

NCT06582810ClinicalTrials.gov

Lidocaine Infusion Treatment for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Headaches

Lidocaine Infusion As A Treatment Modality For Headache Following Non-Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Cohort Study

In reclutamentoAccetta partecipanti ora, secondo la scheda del registro.
Contatta questo studio

In breve

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate intravenous lidocaine efficacy and safety in treating headache following non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Through this prospective analysis, the investigators hope to: 1. show that intravenous lidocaine infusion causes a clinically significant reduction…

Osservazionale20 partecipanti ricercati1 centro1 paese

Categorie

Registrato in 1 registro

Uno studio può essere registrato in più registri. Lo mostriamo una volta sola e colleghiamo ogni scheda in nostro possesso.

Le informazioni sulla sperimentazione sono mostrate così come pubblicate dal registro, nella lingua originale.

Ti interessa questo studio?

Accedi oppure crea un account per registrare il tuo interesse e seguire questo studio.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2024-09-03; recorded start 2025-01-31
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Not stated: Whether participants are randomly assigned is not stated in the registry recordNo allocation method is recorded
  • Not stated: A comparison group is not stated in the registry recordThe record describes a single study arm
  • Not stated: Whether the study is blinded is not stated in the registry recordNo masking information is recorded
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 182 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (University of Kansas Medical Center)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 2 conditions.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: other.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourEXPLORATORY

An exploratory-stage design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation0/20

    Allocation not stated in the record

  • Blinding0/20

    Masking not stated in the record

  • Control arm0/15

    No comparator arm stated in the record

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type3/10

    Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)

  • Multi-centre0/8

    Single site, or site count not stated

  • Data monitoring committee0/7

    No data monitoring committee stated

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScalePILOT

A pilot-scale study: 20 participants (target), run at 1 site.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment10/40

    20 participants (target)

  • Site count0/25

    1 sites

  • Country count0/15

    Single country

  • Planned duration8/10

    Planned over about 42 months

  • Sponsor scale9/10

    University of Kansas Medical Center has led 180 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Sintesi

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate intravenous lidocaine efficacy and safety in treating headache following non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Through this prospective analysis, the investigators hope to: 1. show that intravenous lidocaine infusion causes a clinically significant reduction in pain scores in patients with moderate/severe headache pain following non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage; 2. show that intravenous lidocaine infusion is safe in treating headache following non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage; 3. and report vasospasm prevalence in the cohort. Participants will receive lidocaine infusion as treatment for non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage headache and provide pain scores (on a numeric pain scale) every two hours the patients are awake for a maximum of seven days. Monitoring for vasospasm will occur as part of the patients regular medical care.

Patologie

  • Subarachnoid; Hemorrhage, Nontraumatic
  • Headache

Idoneità

Idoneità
SessoTutti
Età18 YearsNessun massimo
Volontari saniNo
Metodo di campionamentoNON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE

Popolazione dello studio

Patients will be recruited once a diagnosis of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage has been confirmed and the patients meet the inclusion criteria for the study. The investigators will exclude incarcerated patients and pregnant women from the study, but the investigators will include patients that cannot consent themselves, as long as the patient meets the inclusion criteria, the investigators can gain consent from the patient's legal guardian/representative, and the patient can report a numeric pain score for the full length of the study (every 2 h the patient is awake for up to 7 days).

Idoneità come riportata nel registro

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients \> 18 years; * Have a favorable neurological status defined as Hunt and Hess score ≤ 3 (as it accounts for patient awareness); * Can communicate numeric pain scores; * Are diagnosed with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage Exclusion Criteria: * The patient is diagnosed with traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage; * If the patient is \< 18 years of age; * If numeric pain scores could not be captured for \> 3 days of hospitalization; * If the patient had a prior aneurysm; * Chronic pain not associated with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage diagnosis; * A disability before the stroke (\> 2 on modified Rankin Scale score); * A Hunt and Hess score \> 3; * Contraindications to lidocaine (significant cardiac disease, arrhythmia, seizures, previous allergic reaction to lidocaine

Idoneità in frasi semplici

I criteri di questa scheda non sono ancora stati suddivisi in affermazioni distinte. Il testo del registro qui sopra è completo ed è la versione autorevole.

Disegno dello studio

Disegno dello studio
Tipo di studioOsservazionale
FaseNon indicato nella scheda del registro
AssegnazioneNon indicato nella scheda del registro
Modello di interventoNon indicato nella scheda del registro
Finalità principaleNon indicato nella scheda del registro
MascheramentoNon indicato nella scheda del registro
Arruolamento20 partecipanti ricercati

Sponsor e collaboratori

  • University of Kansas Medical Center Sponsor
  • Ascension Health Collaboratori

Bracci e interventi

  • Lidocaine infusion

    Patients will receive a 100 mg intravenous lidocaine bolus followed by an initial infusion at a rate of 2 mg∙kg -1∙h-1 based on ideal body weight. Lidocaine infusions will continue for a minimum of 1 h post-bolus. If headache numeric pain score decreases at all after initiation of infusion, then the rate will drop to 1 mg∙kg -1∙h-1. If headache numeric pain score starts increasing again, then the rate will return to 2 mg∙kg -1∙h-1, otherwise it will remain at 1 mg∙kg -1∙h-1 for up to 48 h.

Esiti misurati

  1. Esito primario

    Reduction of pain

    Reduction of pain ≥ 2 points in the numeric pain score after lidocaine infusion treatment. The numeric pain score is a score rating severity of pain from 0 to 10, with higher scores meaning worse pain. The reduction in pain scores indicates a decrease in severity of pain.

    Orizzonte temporale Benefit should be seen within first 24 h of infusion

  2. Altro esito

    Prevalence of vasospasm

    Observe the prevalence of vasospasm in participants that receive lidocaine infusion

    Orizzonte temporale Within the first 7 days participants are receiving treatment

Date

Date
Data di inizio31 gennaio 2025 (effettiva)
Conclusione primaria1 ottobre 2027 (stimata)
Conclusione1 luglio 2028 (stimata)
Prima pubblicazione3 settembre 2024 (effettiva)
Ultimo aggiornamento10 luglio 2026
Risultati pubblicatiNon indicato nella scheda del registro
Stato verificato l'ultima voltaluglio 2026

«Effettiva» significa che l'evento è avvenuto. «Stimata» significa che lo sponsor lo prevede. Le due cose non sono equivalenti.

Centri

1 centro sta reclutando

United States

United States
StrutturaCittàStato o regioneStato
Ascension Via Christi St. FrancisWichitaKansasIn reclutamento

Documenti dello studio

In questa scheda del registro non sono collegati documenti.

Modifiche nel tempo

Non è stata registrata alcuna modifica da quando abbiamo acquisito questa scheda.

Viene registrata una modifica ogni volta che lo sponsor aggiorna la scheda del registro. Stato, date, arruolamento e centri compaiono qui man mano che cambiano.