Zum Hauptinhalt springen
xMedica

NCT04634240ClinicalTrials.gov

Staged Complete Revascularization for Coronary Artery Disease vs Medical Management Alone in Patients With AS Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Study of Staged Complete Revascularization With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Treat Coronary Artery Disease vs Medical Management Alone in Patients With Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis Undergoing Elective Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The COMPLETE TAVR Study

RekrutiertNimmt laut Registereintrag derzeit Teilnehmende auf.
Diese Studie kontaktieren

Kurz gefasst

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) often have concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) which may adversely affect prognosis. There is uncertainty about the benefits and the optimal timing of revascularization for such patients. There is currently clinical equipoise regarding…

Interventionell4.000 Teilnehmende gesucht72 Studienzentren2 Länder

Kategorien

In 1 Register registriert

Eine Studie kann in mehreren Registern registriert sein. Wir zeigen sie einmal und verlinken jeden Eintrag, den wir haben.

Die Studieninformationen werden so angezeigt, wie sie vom Register veröffentlicht wurden, in ihrer Originalsprache.

Interesse an dieser Studie?

Anmelden oder ein Konto erstellen um Ihr Interesse zu bekunden und diese Studie zu verfolgen.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2020-11-18; recorded start 2020-12-19
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
  • Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
  • Present: Uses blinding (masking)A masking level is recorded in the record
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 301 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (University of British Columbia)
  • Not stated: No posted results from this sponsor are in this database yetBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 3 conditions.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: other.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourSTRONG

A strong methodological design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation20/20

    Participants are randomly allocated between arms

  • Blinding7/20

    Single-blind

  • Control arm0/15

    No comparator arm stated in the record

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type10/10

    Mortality / MACE endpoint (hard clinical outcome)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 72 sites

  • Data monitoring committee7/7

    A data monitoring committee is in place

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleLARGE

A large study, international in scope: 4,000 participants (target), run at 72 sites, across 2 countries.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment35/40

    4,000 participants (target)

  • Site count21/25

    72 sites

  • Country count7/15

    2 countries

  • Planned duration10/10

    Planned over about 64 months

  • Sponsor scale9/10

    University of British Columbia has led 297 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Zusammenfassung

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) often have concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) which may adversely affect prognosis. There is uncertainty about the benefits and the optimal timing of revascularization for such patients. There is currently clinical equipoise regarding the management of concomitant CAD in patients undergoing TAVR. Some centers perform routine revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (either before or after TAVR), while others follow an alternative strategy of medical management. The potential benefits and optimal timing of PCI in these patients are unknown. As TAVR expands to lower risk patients, and potentially becomes the preferred therapy for the majority of patients with severe aortic stenosis, the optimal management of concomitant coronary artery disease will be of increasing importance. The COMPLETE TAVR study will determine whether, on a background of guideline-directed medical therapy, a strategy of complete revascularization involving staged PCI using drug eluting stents to treat all suitable coronary artery lesions is superior to a strategy of medical therapy alone in reducing the composite outcome of Cardiovascular Death, new Myocardial Infarction, Ischemia-driven Revascularization or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina or Heart Failure. The study will be a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial with blinded adjudication of outcomes. Patients will be screened and consented for elective transfemoral TAVR and randomized within 96 hours of successful balloon expandable TAVR. Complete Revascularization: Staged PCI using third generation drug eluting stents to treat all suitable coronary artery lesions in vessels that are at least 2.5 mm in diameter and that are amenable to treatment with PCI and have a ≥70% visual angiographic diameter stenosis. Staged PCI can occur any time from 1 to 45 days post successful transfemoral TAVR. Vs. Medical Therapy Alone: No further revascularization of coronary artery lesions. All patients, regardless of randomized treatment allocation, will receive guideline-directed medical therapy consisting of risk factor modification and use of evidence-based therapies. The COMPLETE TAVR study will help address the current lack of evidence in this area. It will likely impact both the global delivery of health care and the management and clinical outcomes of all patients undergoing TAVR with concomitant CAD.

Erkrankungen

  • Coronary Stenosis
  • Aortic Stenosis
  • Coronary Artery Disease

Eignung

Eignung
GeschlechtAlle
AlterIm Registereintrag nicht angegeben
Gesunde FreiwilligeNein

Eignung im Wortlaut des Registers

Inclusion Criteria: \- Symptomatic aortic valve stenosis prior to TAVR (NYHA Functional Class ≥ 2 OR Abnormal exercise test with severe SOB, abnormal BP response, or arrhythmia) AND \- CAD defined as: at least 1 coronary artery lesion of ≥70% visual angiographic diameter stenosis in a native segment ≥2.5 mm in diameter that is not a CTO and is amenable to treatment with PCI AND \- Consensus by the Local Multidisciplinary Heart Team that the patient is suitable for elective transfemoral TAVR with a balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve AND would receive a bypass with an anastomosis distal to the coronary artery lesion(s) if they were undergoing SAVR. Local Multidisciplinary Heart Teams are expected to follow current clinical guidelines for selection of patients for TAVR with an eligible patient generally expected to have: \[AVA ≤ 1.0 cm2 OR AVA index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2\] OR \[Jet velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s OR mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg\] OR patients without these criteria may undergo TAVR if the Local Multidisciplinary Heart Team concludes it is appropriate. AND \- Successful transfemoral TAVR, defined as the implantation of a single transcatheter aortic valve within the past 96 hours with freedom from more than minimal aortic insufficiency, stroke, or major vascular complications. Exclusion Criteria: * PCI already performed within 90 days prior to TAVR or at the same time as the index transfemoral TAVR procedure * Planned PCI of coronary artery lesion(s) * Planned surgical revascularization of coronary artery lesion(s) * Non-cardiovascular co-morbidity reducing life expectancy to \< 5 years * Any factor precluding 5-year follow-up * Prior coronary artery bypass grafting surgery or surgical valve replacement * Severe mitral regurgitation (\> 3+) * Severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF \< 30%) * Low coronary takeoff (high risk for coronary obstruction) * Acute myocardial infarction within 90 days * Stroke or transient ischemic attack within 90 days * Renal insufficiency (eGFR \< 30 ml/min) and/or renal replacement Rx * Hemodynamic or respiratory instability

Eignung in einfachen Aussagen

Die Kriterien dieses Eintrags wurden noch nicht in einzelne Aussagen aufgeschlüsselt. Der Registertext oben ist vollständig und ist die maßgebliche Fassung.

Studiendesign

Studiendesign
StudientypInterventionell
PhaseNicht zutreffend
ZuteilungRandomisiert
InterventionsmodellPARALLEL
Primäres ZielTREATMENT
VerblindungSINGLE (1)
Teilnahme4.000 Teilnehmende gesucht

Sponsor und Mitwirkende

  • University of British Columbia Sponsor

Studienarme und Interventionen

  • Complete RevascularizationEXPERIMENTAL

    Routine PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) of all suitable coronary artery stenoses of ≥70% in vessels ≥2.5mm in diameter.

  • Medical Therapy AloneNO_INTERVENTION

    No revascularization of coronary artery lesions.

Interventionen

  • Eingriff Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)

    PCI of all qualifying lesions.

Endpunkte

  1. Primärer Endpunkt

    Composite of Cardiovascular Death or New Myocardial Infarction or Ischemia-Driven Revascularization or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina or Heart Failure

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  2. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Cardiovascular Death or New Myocardial Infarction

    Deaths will be classified as cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular. All deaths with a clear cardiovascular or unknown cause, will be classified as cardiovascular. However, within cardiovascular deaths, hemorrhagic deaths will be clearly identified. Only deaths due to a documented non-cardiovascular cause (e.g., cancer) will be classified as non-cardiovascular. Myocardial Infarction will be defined according to the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, with modification for Type 4a (PCI-related) and Type 5 (CABG-related) as defined for the ISCHEMIA trial and as used in the COMPLETE trial.

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  3. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Transaortic gradient immediately post-TAVR (echocardiographically-derived vs. direct invasive measurement)

    Zeitrahmen Immediately post-TAVR

  4. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Transaortic Gradient Reclassification

    Proportion of patients developing echocardiographic aortic gradient ≥20 mmHg who are found to have a gradient \< 20 mmHg on direct hemodynamic assessment.

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  5. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    VARC-3 Hemodynamic Valve Deterioration Reclassification

    Proportion of patients developing ≥ moderate echocardiographic VARC-3 valve deterioration reclassified to \< moderate VARC-3 valve deterioration using direct invasive methods, including mean gradient and valve area.

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  6. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch (PPM) Reclassification

    Proportion of patients with echocardiographic severe PPM immediately post-TAVR, reclassified as non-severe PPM using direct invasive methods.

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  7. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Composite of CV Death, New MI, IDR or Hospitalization for UA or for HF in patients with PPM and elevated gradients vs those without

    Deaths: will be classified as cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular. All deaths with a clear cardiovascular or unknown cause, will be classified as cardiovascular. However, within cardiovascular deaths, hemorrhagic deaths will be clearly identified. Only deaths due to a documented non-cardiovascular cause (e.g., cancer) will be classified as non-cardiovascular. Myocardial Infarction: will be defined according to the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, with modification for Type 4a (PCI-related) and Type 5 (CABG-related) as defined for the ISCHEMIA trial and as used in the COMPLETE trial. Hospital admission: for protocol-defined unstable angina, new/worsening NYHA Class IV heart failure, or for protocol-defined Ischemia-driven revascularization, among patients with patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM), elevated echocardiography-derived transaortic gradients and elevated direct invasive transaortic gradient vs those without.

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  8. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Composite outcome of mean echocardiographic gradient ≥ 20mmHg, severe PPM, ≥ moderate AR, thrombosis, endocarditis, and aortic valve re-intervention

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  9. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Cardiovascular Death

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  10. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    New Myocardial Infarction

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  11. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Ischemia-Driven Revascularization

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  12. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Hospitalization for Unstable Angina or Heart Failure

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  13. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    All-cause Mortality

    Includes deaths from both cardiac and non-cardiac causes

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  14. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Stroke

    Defined as the presence of a new focal neurologic deficit thought to be vascular in origin, with signs or symptoms lasting more than 24 hours. It is strongly recommended (but not required) that an imaging procedure such as CT scan or MRI be performed. Stroke will be further classified as ischemic, hemorrhagic or type uncertain.

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  15. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Bleeding

    Clinically overt, symptomatic bleeding with at least one of the following criteria: * Fatal, or * Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or * Retroperitoneal hemorrhage, or * Intraocular hemorrhage leading to significant vision loss, or * Decrease in hemoglobin of 3.0 g/dL (with each blood transfusion unit counting for 1.0 g/dL of Hb) or requiring transfusion of two or more units of red blood cells or equivalent of whole blood. * Requiring surgical intervention to stop the bleeding

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  16. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Angina status

    As evaluated by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  17. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Economic evaluation

    Includes health resource utilization, costs, and cost-effectiveness

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  18. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Patient-reported outcomes

    Health-related quality of life as evaluated by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter.

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  19. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Contrast-associated acute kidney injury

    An absolute rise in serum creatinine of greater than or equal to 44 μmol/L from baseline and/or a relative rise in serum creatinine of ≥25% compared to baseline at any time between 48hrs and 96hrs post-procedure.

    Zeitrahmen Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  20. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Fluoroscopic time for Staged PCI procedure

    Total time under fluoroscopy

    Zeitrahmen During PCI procedure

  21. Sekundärer Endpunkt

    Contrast Utilization for Stages PCI Procedure

    Zeitrahmen During PCI procedure

Daten

Daten
Startdatum19. Dezember 2020 (tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss1. April 2026 (geschätzt)
Abschluss1. April 2026 (geschätzt)
Erstveröffentlichung18. November 2020 (tatsächlich)
Zuletzt aktualisiert24. Juli 2025
Ergebnisse veröffentlichtIm Registereintrag nicht angegeben
Status zuletzt bestätigtJuli 2025

Tatsächlich bedeutet, dass das Ereignis eingetreten ist. Geschätzt bedeutet, dass der Sponsor es erwartet. Die beiden bedeuten Unterschiedliches.

Standorte

71 Studienzentren rekrutieren

Canada

Canada
EinrichtungStadtBundesland oder RegionStatus
University of Alberta, Mazankowski Heart InstituteEdmontonAlbertaRekrutiert
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreHalifaxNova ScotiaRekrutiert
Hamilton Health SciencesHamiltonOntarioRekrutiert
Sacré-CoeurMontrealQuebecRekrutiert
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de MontréalMontrealQuebecRekrutiert
Montréal HeartMontrealQuebecRekrutiert
Royal Columbian HospitalNew WestminsterBritish ColumbiaRekrutiert
Ottawa HeartOttawaOntarioRekrutiert
Prairie VascularReginaSaskatchewanRekrutiert
New Brunswick HeartSaint JohnNew BrunswickRekrutiert
CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUSSherbrookeQuebecRekrutiert
St. Michael's HospitalTorontoOntarioRekrutiert
Sunnybrook HospitalTorontoOntarioRekrutiert
Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation-Centre d'Innovation Cardiovasculaire (CCI-CIC)VancouverBritish ColumbiaRekrutierung noch nicht begonnen
Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBritish ColumbiaRekrutiert
St. Paul's HospitalVancouverBritish ColumbiaRekrutiert
Saint BonifaceWinnipegManitobaRekrutiert

United States

United States
EinrichtungStadtBundesland oder RegionStatus
Summa Health SystemAkronOhioRekrutiert
PiedmontAtlantaGeorgiaRekrutiert
JFK Medical CenterAtlantisFloridaRekrutiert
St. Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterBoiseIdahoRekrutiert
Tufts MedicalBostonMassachusettsRekrutiert
Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsRekrutiert
University at BuffaloBuffaloNew YorkRekrutiert
University of Vermont Medical CenterBurlingtonVermontRekrutiert
Our Lady of LourdesCamdenNew JerseyRekrutiert
Novant Health Heart and Vascular InstituteCharlotteNorth CarolinaRekrutiert
Ascension Alexian BrothersChicagoIllinoisRekrutiert
Kaiser Permanente NorthwestClackamasOregonRekrutiert
Boone HospitalColumbiaMissouriRekrutiert
Mount CarmelColumbusOhioRekrutiert
Midwest Cardiovascular Research and Education FoundationElkhartIndianaRekrutiert
Parkview Research CenterFort WayneIndianaRekrutiert
Northeast Georgia Health SystemGainesvilleGeorgiaRekrutiert
Methodist Le Bonheur HealthcareGermantownTennesseeRekrutiert
Bellin Health SystemGreen BayWisconsinRekrutiert
HCA Houston Healthcare Medical CenterHoustonTexasRekrutiert
Huntsville Heart CenterHuntsvilleAlabamaRekrutiert
Baptist Health JacksonvilleJacksonvilleFloridaRekrutiert
University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityKansasRekrutiert
Ballad Health CVA Heart InstituteKingsportTennesseeRekrutiert
Parkwest Medical CenterKnoxvilleTennesseeRekrutiert
Sparrow Clinical Research InstituteLansingMichiganRekrutiert
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonNew HampshireRekrutiert
Bryan HeartLincolnNebraskaRekrutiert
Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic/Baptist MemorialMemphisTennesseeRekrutiert
Miami Cardiac and Vascular/Baptist HospitalMiamiFloridaRekrutiert
Ascension Columbia St. Mary'sMilwaukeeWisconsinRekrutiert
NYU Langone Hospital - Long IslandMineolaNew YorkRekrutiert
University of Minnesota Medical CenterMinneapolisMinnesotaRekrutiert

22 weitere Studienzentren sind im Registereintrag aufgeführt.

Studiendokumente

In diesem Registereintrag sind keine Dokumente verlinkt.

Änderungen im Zeitverlauf

Seit wir diesen Eintrag erstmals eingelesen haben, wurden keine Änderungen erfasst.

Eine Änderung wird jedes Mal erfasst, wenn der Sponsor den Registereintrag aktualisiert. Status, Daten, Teilnahme und Studienzentren erscheinen hier, sobald sie sich ändern.