Saltar al contenido principal
xMedica

NCT05061004ClinicalTrials.gov

Cephea Early Feasibility Study

En reclutamientoAdmite participantes ahora, según el registro.
Contactar con este estudio

En resumen

The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effectiveness of the Cephea Mitral Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) in…

De intervención90 participantes buscados22 centros2 países

Categorías

Registrado en 1 registro

Un mismo estudio puede estar registrado en varios registros. Lo mostramos una sola vez y enlazamos con todos los registros que tenemos.

La información del ensayo se muestra tal como la publicó el registro, en su idioma original.

¿Le interesa este estudio?

Iniciar sesión o cree una cuenta para registrar su interés y seguir este estudio.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2021-09-29; recorded start 2022-04-28
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Not stated: Participants are not randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as non-randomised
  • Not stated: A comparison group is not stated in the registry recordThe record describes a single study arm
  • Not stated: Open label (no blinding)Masking is recorded as none (open label)
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 82 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Abbott Medical Devices)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 1 condition.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourEXPLORATORY

An exploratory-stage design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation0/20

    Allocation not stated in the record

  • Blinding0/20

    Open-label

  • Control arm0/15

    No comparator arm stated in the record

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type3/10

    Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 22 sites

  • Data monitoring committee0/7

    Data monitoring committee not stated in the record

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleSMALL

A small study, international in scope: 90 participants (target), run at 22 sites, across 2 countries.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment15/40

    50 participants (target)

  • Site count16/25

    22 sites

  • Country count7/15

    2 countries

  • Planned duration10/10

    Planned over about 108 months

  • Sponsor scale7/10

    Abbott Medical Devices has led 83 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Resumen

The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effectiveness of the Cephea Mitral Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) in whom transcatheter therapy is deemed more appropriate than open heart surgery.

Afecciones

  • Mitral Regurgitation

Elegibilidad

Elegibilidad
SexoTodos
Edades18 YearsSin máximo
Voluntarios sanosNo

Elegibilidad tal como figura en el registro

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Mitral valve disease resulting in mitral regurgitation (MR ≥ Grade III) and/or severe mitral valve stenosis (mitral valve area ≤ 1.5cm² and/or mean transmitral gradient ≥10 mmHg at normal heart rate) per American Society of Echocardiography criteria. * LVEF ≥ 30% * In the judgement of the Site Heart Team, transcatheter therapy is deemed more appropriate than open heart surgery. Key Exclusion Criteria: * Prior surgical or interventional treatment that interferes with the Cephea valve delivery or function. * Need for emergent or urgent surgery.

Elegibilidad en frases sencillas

Los criterios de este registro aún no se han desglosado en frases separadas. El texto del registro anterior está completo y es la versión autorizada.

Diseño del estudio

Diseño del estudio
Tipo de estudioDe intervención
FaseNo aplicable
AsignaciónNo aplicable
Modelo de intervenciónSINGLE_GROUP
Propósito principalTREATMENT
EnmascaramientoNONE (0)
Inscripción90 participantes buscados

Patrocinador y colaboradores

  • Abbott Medical Devices Patrocinador

Grupos e intervenciones

  • TreatmentEXPERIMENTAL

    Treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) with the Cephea Mitral Valve System

Intervenciones

  • Dispositivo Cephea Mitral Valve System

    Transcatheter mitral valve replacement

Variables de resultado

  1. Variable de resultado principal

    Primary Safety Endpoint

    Freedom from all-cause mortality, which will be assessed at 30 days post implant.

    Plazo 30 days post implant

  2. Variable de resultado principal

    Primary Effectiveness Endpoint

    Proportion of subjects with reduction of MR to ≤ Grade I, will be assessed at 30 days post implant.

    Plazo 30 days post implant

Fechas

Fechas
Fecha de inicio28 de abril de 2022 (real)
Finalización principal31 de diciembre de 2026 (estimada)
Finalización1 de marzo de 2031 (estimada)
Primera publicación29 de septiembre de 2021 (real)
Última actualización11 de septiembre de 2026
Resultados publicadosNo indicado en el registro
Estado verificado por última vezdiciembre de 2025

Real significa que el evento ocurrió. Estimada significa que el patrocinador lo prevé. Ambas cosas significan algo distinto.

Ubicaciones

20 centros están en reclutamiento

Canada

Canada
CentroCiudadEstado o regiónEstado
Institut de Cardiologie de MontrealMontrealQuebecCompletado
IUCPQ-ULavalQuébecQuebecRetirado

United States

United States
CentroCiudadEstado o regiónEstado
University of Michigan - Davis Medical CenterAnn ArborMichiganEn reclutamiento
Piedmont Heart InstituteAtlantaGeorgiaEn reclutamiento
Emory University HospitalAtlantaGeorgiaEn reclutamiento
Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical CenterCharlotteNorth CarolinaEn reclutamiento
Northwestern Memorial HospitalChicagoIllinoisEn reclutamiento
The Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhioEn reclutamiento
Houston MethodistHoustonTexasEn reclutamiento
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaEn reclutamiento
Minneapolis Heart InstituteMinneapolisMinnesotaEn reclutamiento
Ascension Saint ThomasNashvilleTennesseeEn reclutamiento
Vanderbilt Heart & Vascular InstituteNashvilleTennesseeEn reclutamiento
New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkEn reclutamiento
Sentara Norfolk General HospitalNorfolkVirginiaEn reclutamiento
Banner-University Medical Center PhoenixPhoenixArizonaEn reclutamiento
Allegheny General Hospital - ASRIPittsburghPennsylvaniaEn reclutamiento
University of California - Davis Medical CenterSacramentoCaliforniaEn reclutamiento
Swedish Medical CenterSeattleWashingtonEn reclutamiento
Montefiore Medical Center - Moses CampusThe BronxNew YorkEn reclutamiento
Los Robles Regional Medical CenterThousand OaksCaliforniaEn reclutamiento
Ascension Via Christi Hospitals WichitaWichitaKansasEn reclutamiento

Documentos del estudio

No hay documentos enlazados en este registro.

Cambios a lo largo del tiempo

  1. 11 de septiembre de 2026

    Objetivo de inscripción modificado

    Enrollment target revised up from 50 to 90

    5090