Aller au contenu principal
xMedica

NCT05061004ClinicalTrials.gov

Cephea Early Feasibility Study

En recrutementAccepte des participants actuellement, selon la fiche du registre.
Contacter cette étude

En bref

The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effectiveness of the Cephea Mitral Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) in…

Interventionnelle90 participants recherchés22 sites2 pays

Catégories

Enregistré dans 1 registre

Une même étude peut être enregistrée dans plusieurs registres. Nous l'affichons une seule fois et renvoyons vers chaque fiche que nous détenons.

Les informations de l'essai sont affichées telles que publiées par le registre, dans leur langue d'origine.

Cette étude vous intéresse ?

Se connecter ou créez un compte pour manifester votre intérêt et suivre cette étude.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2021-09-29; recorded start 2022-04-28
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Not stated: Participants are not randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as non-randomised
  • Not stated: A comparison group is not stated in the registry recordThe record describes a single study arm
  • Not stated: Open label (no blinding)Masking is recorded as none (open label)
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 82 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Abbott Medical Devices)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 1 condition.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourEXPLORATORY

An exploratory-stage design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation0/20

    Allocation not stated in the record

  • Blinding0/20

    Open-label

  • Control arm0/15

    No comparator arm stated in the record

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type3/10

    Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 22 sites

  • Data monitoring committee0/7

    Data monitoring committee not stated in the record

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleSMALL

A small study, international in scope: 90 participants (target), run at 22 sites, across 2 countries.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment15/40

    50 participants (target)

  • Site count16/25

    22 sites

  • Country count7/15

    2 countries

  • Planned duration10/10

    Planned over about 108 months

  • Sponsor scale7/10

    Abbott Medical Devices has led 83 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Résumé

The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effectiveness of the Cephea Mitral Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) in whom transcatheter therapy is deemed more appropriate than open heart surgery.

Affections

  • Mitral Regurgitation

Éligibilité

Éligibilité
SexeTous
Âges18 YearsAucun maximum
Volontaires sainsNon

Éligibilité telle qu'elle figure dans le registre

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Mitral valve disease resulting in mitral regurgitation (MR ≥ Grade III) and/or severe mitral valve stenosis (mitral valve area ≤ 1.5cm² and/or mean transmitral gradient ≥10 mmHg at normal heart rate) per American Society of Echocardiography criteria. * LVEF ≥ 30% * In the judgement of the Site Heart Team, transcatheter therapy is deemed more appropriate than open heart surgery. Key Exclusion Criteria: * Prior surgical or interventional treatment that interferes with the Cephea valve delivery or function. * Need for emergent or urgent surgery.

Éligibilité en énoncés simples

Les critères de cette fiche n'ont pas encore été décomposés en énoncés distincts. Le texte du registre ci-dessus est complet et fait foi.

Conception de l'étude

Conception de l'étude
Type d'étudeInterventionnelle
PhaseSans objet
RépartitionSans objet
Modèle d'interventionSINGLE_GROUP
Objectif principalTREATMENT
InsuNONE (0)
Recrutement90 participants recherchés

Promoteur et collaborateurs

  • Abbott Medical Devices Promoteur

Groupes et interventions

  • TreatmentEXPERIMENTAL

    Treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) with the Cephea Mitral Valve System

Interventions

  • Dispositif Cephea Mitral Valve System

    Transcatheter mitral valve replacement

Critères de jugement

  1. Critère de jugement principal

    Primary Safety Endpoint

    Freedom from all-cause mortality, which will be assessed at 30 days post implant.

    Délai 30 days post implant

  2. Critère de jugement principal

    Primary Effectiveness Endpoint

    Proportion of subjects with reduction of MR to ≤ Grade I, will be assessed at 30 days post implant.

    Délai 30 days post implant

Dates

Dates
Date de début28 avril 2022 (réelle)
Achèvement principal31 décembre 2026 (estimée)
Achèvement1 mars 2031 (estimée)
Première publication29 septembre 2021 (réelle)
Dernière mise à jour11 septembre 2026
Résultats publiésNon précisé dans la fiche du registre
Statut vérifié pour la dernière foisdécembre 2025

Réelle signifie que l'événement a eu lieu. Estimée signifie que le promoteur s'y attend. Les deux ont un sens différent.

Lieux

20 sites sont en recrutement

Canada

Canada
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Institut de Cardiologie de MontrealMontrealQuebecTerminé
IUCPQ-ULavalQuébecQuebecRetiré

United States

United States
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
University of Michigan - Davis Medical CenterAnn ArborMichiganEn recrutement
Piedmont Heart InstituteAtlantaGeorgiaEn recrutement
Emory University HospitalAtlantaGeorgiaEn recrutement
Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical CenterCharlotteNorth CarolinaEn recrutement
Northwestern Memorial HospitalChicagoIllinoisEn recrutement
The Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhioEn recrutement
Houston MethodistHoustonTexasEn recrutement
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaEn recrutement
Minneapolis Heart InstituteMinneapolisMinnesotaEn recrutement
Ascension Saint ThomasNashvilleTennesseeEn recrutement
Vanderbilt Heart & Vascular InstituteNashvilleTennesseeEn recrutement
New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkEn recrutement
Sentara Norfolk General HospitalNorfolkVirginiaEn recrutement
Banner-University Medical Center PhoenixPhoenixArizonaEn recrutement
Allegheny General Hospital - ASRIPittsburghPennsylvaniaEn recrutement
University of California - Davis Medical CenterSacramentoCaliforniaEn recrutement
Swedish Medical CenterSeattleWashingtonEn recrutement
Montefiore Medical Center - Moses CampusThe BronxNew YorkEn recrutement
Los Robles Regional Medical CenterThousand OaksCaliforniaEn recrutement
Ascension Via Christi Hospitals WichitaWichitaKansasEn recrutement

Documents de l'étude

Aucun document n'est lié dans cette fiche du registre.

Évolution au fil du temps

  1. 11 septembre 2026

    Objectif de recrutement modifié

    Enrollment target revised up from 50 to 90

    5090