NCT05061004ClinicalTrials.gov
Cephea Early Feasibility Study
En bref
The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effectiveness of the Cephea Mitral Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) in…
Interventionnelle90 participants recherchés22 sites2 pays
Catégories
Enregistré dans 1 registre
- ClinicalTrials.govNCT05061004Ouvrir cette fiche sur ClinicalTrials.govSynchronisé la semaine dernière
Une même étude peut être enregistrée dans plusieurs registres. Nous l'affichons une seule fois et renvoyons vers chaque fiche que nous détenons.
Les informations de l'essai sont affichées telles que publiées par le registre, dans leur langue d'origine.
Cette étude vous intéresse ?
Se connecter ou créez un compte pour manifester votre intérêt et suivre cette étude.
How this study is set up
The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.
- Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2021-09-29; recorded start 2022-04-28
- Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
- Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
- Not stated: Participants are not randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as non-randomised
- Not stated: A comparison group is not stated in the registry recordThe record describes a single study arm
- Not stated: Open label (no blinding)Masking is recorded as none (open label)
- Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
- Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
- Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
- Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
- Present: Sponsor has 82 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Abbott Medical Devices)
- Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
- The record lists 1 condition.
- Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
Trial stature
Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.
An exploratory-stage design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.
How this score is built
- Randomised allocation0/20
Allocation not stated in the record
- Blinding0/20
Open-label
- Control arm0/15
No comparator arm stated in the record
- Primary-outcome specificity10/10
Named primary outcome with a defined time frame
- Endpoint type3/10
Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)
- Multi-centre8/8
Multi-centre: 22 sites
- Data monitoring committee0/7
Data monitoring committee not stated in the record
- Prospective registration5/5
Registered before the study start date
- Protocol / SAP posted0/5
No protocol or SAP posted to the registry
A small study, international in scope: 90 participants (target), run at 22 sites, across 2 countries.
How this score is built
- Enrolment15/40
50 participants (target)
- Site count16/25
22 sites
- Country count7/15
2 countries
- Planned duration10/10
Planned over about 108 months
- Sponsor scale7/10
Abbott Medical Devices has led 83 trials in our corpus
We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.
How this score is built
- Investigator standing0/100
No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial
These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.
Résumé
The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effectiveness of the Cephea Mitral Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) in whom transcatheter therapy is deemed more appropriate than open heart surgery.
Affections
- Mitral Regurgitation
Éligibilité
| Sexe | Tous |
|---|---|
| Âges | 18 Years – Aucun maximum |
| Volontaires sains | Non |
Éligibilité telle qu'elle figure dans le registre
Éligibilité en énoncés simples
Les critères de cette fiche n'ont pas encore été décomposés en énoncés distincts. Le texte du registre ci-dessus est complet et fait foi.
Conception de l'étude
| Type d'étude | Interventionnelle |
|---|---|
| Phase | Sans objet |
| Répartition | Sans objet |
| Modèle d'intervention | SINGLE_GROUP |
| Objectif principal | TREATMENT |
| Insu | NONE (0) |
| Recrutement | 90 participants recherchés |
Promoteur et collaborateurs
- Abbott Medical Devices Promoteur
Groupes et interventions
- TreatmentEXPERIMENTAL
Treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) with the Cephea Mitral Valve System
Interventions
- Dispositif Cephea Mitral Valve System
Transcatheter mitral valve replacement
Critères de jugement
Critère de jugement principal
Primary Safety Endpoint
Freedom from all-cause mortality, which will be assessed at 30 days post implant.
Délai 30 days post implant
Critère de jugement principal
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Proportion of subjects with reduction of MR to ≤ Grade I, will be assessed at 30 days post implant.
Délai 30 days post implant
Dates
| Date de début | 28 avril 2022 (réelle) |
|---|---|
| Achèvement principal | 31 décembre 2026 (estimée) |
| Achèvement | 1 mars 2031 (estimée) |
| Première publication | 29 septembre 2021 (réelle) |
| Dernière mise à jour | 11 septembre 2026 |
| Résultats publiés | Non précisé dans la fiche du registre |
| Statut vérifié pour la dernière fois | décembre 2025 |
Réelle signifie que l'événement a eu lieu. Estimée signifie que le promoteur s'y attend. Les deux ont un sens différent.
Lieux
20 sites sont en recrutement
Canada
| Établissement | Ville | État ou région | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal | Montreal | Quebec | Terminé |
| IUCPQ-ULaval | Québec | Quebec | Retiré |
United States
| Établissement | Ville | État ou région | Statut |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Michigan - Davis Medical Center | Ann Arbor | Michigan | En recrutement |
| Piedmont Heart Institute | Atlanta | Georgia | En recrutement |
| Emory University Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | En recrutement |
| Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical Center | Charlotte | North Carolina | En recrutement |
| Northwestern Memorial Hospital | Chicago | Illinois | En recrutement |
| The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio | En recrutement |
| Houston Methodist | Houston | Texas | En recrutement |
| Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Los Angeles | California | En recrutement |
| Minneapolis Heart Institute | Minneapolis | Minnesota | En recrutement |
| Ascension Saint Thomas | Nashville | Tennessee | En recrutement |
| Vanderbilt Heart & Vascular Institute | Nashville | Tennessee | En recrutement |
| New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York | En recrutement |
| Sentara Norfolk General Hospital | Norfolk | Virginia | En recrutement |
| Banner-University Medical Center Phoenix | Phoenix | Arizona | En recrutement |
| Allegheny General Hospital - ASRI | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | En recrutement |
| University of California - Davis Medical Center | Sacramento | California | En recrutement |
| Swedish Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | En recrutement |
| Montefiore Medical Center - Moses Campus | The Bronx | New York | En recrutement |
| Los Robles Regional Medical Center | Thousand Oaks | California | En recrutement |
| Ascension Via Christi Hospitals Wichita | Wichita | Kansas | En recrutement |
Documents de l'étude
Aucun document n'est lié dans cette fiche du registre.
Évolution au fil du temps
- 11 septembre 2026
Objectif de recrutement modifié
Enrollment target revised up from 50 to 90
5090