Aller au contenu principal
xMedica

NCT07764978ClinicalTrials.gov

Study of AZD0120 in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Ineligible for ASCT

Phase III Open-Label, Randomised Study of Consolidation With AZD0120 (Dual-Targeting BCMA/CD19 CAR-T) vs Continuous Standard Therapy in NDMM Patients Ineligible for ASCT as Initial Therapy (DURGA-5)

En recrutementAccepte des participants actuellement, selon la fiche du registre.
Contacter cette étude

En bref

This is a randomised, multicentre, controlled, open-label, Phase III global study comparing the efficacy and safety of standard induction regimens (IsaVRd and DRd) followed by AZD0120 versus standard induction regimens followed by continuous therapy (IsaRd and DRd) in participants with…

Phase 3750 participants recherchés124 sites15 pays

Catégories

Enregistré dans 1 registre

Une même étude peut être enregistrée dans plusieurs registres. Nous l'affichons une seule fois et renvoyons vers chaque fiche que nous détenons.

Les informations de l'essai sont affichées telles que publiées par le registre, dans leur langue d'origine.

Cette étude vous intéresse ?

Se connecter ou créez un compte pour manifester votre intérêt et suivre cette étude.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Not stated: Registered after enrolment began (about 49 days after the recorded start)First posted 2026-08-14; recorded start 2026-06-26
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
  • Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
  • Not stated: Open label (no blinding)Masking is recorded as none (open label)
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 1019 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (AstraZeneca)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 1 condition.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
  • Intervention regulatory context: investigational, within a phased regulatory pathway.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourSTRONG

A strong methodological design for a phase 3 study, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation20/20

    Participants are randomly allocated between arms

  • Blinding0/20

    Open-label

  • Control arm15/15

    Active-comparator control arm

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type3/10

    Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 124 sites

  • Data monitoring committee7/7

    A data monitoring committee is in place

  • Prospective registration3/5

    Registered within 30 days of the study start

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleLARGE

A large study, international in scope: 750 participants (target), run at 124 sites, across 15 countries.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment28/40

    750 participants (target)

  • Site count23/25

    124 sites

  • Country count12/15

    15 countries

  • Planned duration10/10

    Planned over about 96 months

  • Sponsor scale10/10

    AstraZeneca has led 1,006 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Résumé

This is a randomised, multicentre, controlled, open-label, Phase III global study comparing the efficacy and safety of standard induction regimens (IsaVRd and DRd) followed by AZD0120 versus standard induction regimens followed by continuous therapy (IsaRd and DRd) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as initial therapy.

The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of IsaVRd or DRd induction followed by a single administration of AZD0120 compared to IsaVRd or DRd induction followed by continuous IsaRd or DRd in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) according to IMWG 2016 criteria, and as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and miminal residual disease (MRD) negative complete response (CR) rate at 9 months post-randomisation in participants with NDMM who are ineligible to receive ASCT as initial therapy.

Affections

  • Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Éligibilité

Éligibilité
SexeTous
Âges18 YearsAucun maximum
Volontaires sainsNon

Éligibilité telle qu'elle figure dans le registre

INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Participants must be 18 years or older, at the time of signing the ICF. 2. Participant must have documented diagnosis of MM according to the IMWG diagnostic criteria. 3. Participant must have one or more of the following measurable disease criteria: (a) Serum M-protein level ≥1.0 g/dL, (b) Urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 h, (c)Serum immunoglobulin FLC ≥ 10 mg/dL (100 mg/L) and abnormal serum immunoglobulin kappa lambda FLC ratio. 4. Participant must be deemed ineligible for ASCT while also having adequate organ function for CAR-T cell treatment. 5. Participant is a candidate to receive at least one of the regimens (IsaVRd or DRd) as determined by the Investigator. 6. ECOG performance status Grade of 0 to 2. 7. Participant must have adequate organ and bone marrow function. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Participant has active or prior CNS or meningeal involvement of MM. 2. Participant has primary amyloidosis, active plasma cell leukemia (≥5% circulating plasma cells), Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or POEMS syndrome. 3. Participant has significant neurological or psychiatric condition posing risk or impairing evaluation. 4. Participant has any other significant medical condition that increases unacceptable risk, interferes with therapy delivery, or confounds evaluation. 5. Participant has a history of a prior non-haematologic malignancy unless the participant has been disease-free with no evidence of recurrence for ≥ 2 years. 6. Participant has a history of haematologic malignancies, other than MM, regardless of remission status. 7. Participant is positive for any of the following: 1. HIV: Known to be seropositive for HIV (including any history of HIV). 2. Chronic or active hepatitis B. 3. Active hepatitis C: Hepatitis C infection. 4. Additional local requirements for the testing for infectious diseases and exclusions of applicable participants should be followed per local regulations. 8. Participant has clinically significant cardiovascular disease. 9. Participant has COPD with an FEV1 \< 50% of predicted normal. 10. Additional exclusion for participants who are planned to receive IsaVRd as induction: Participant has peripheral neuropathy Grade 4, Grade 3, Grade 2, or Grade 1 with pain.

Éligibilité en énoncés simples

Les critères de cette fiche n'ont pas encore été décomposés en énoncés distincts. Le texte du registre ci-dessus est complet et fait foi.

Conception de l'étude

Conception de l'étude
Type d'étudeInterventionnelle
PhasePhase 3
RépartitionRandomisée
Modèle d'interventionPARALLEL
Objectif principalTREATMENT
InsuNONE (0)
Recrutement750 participants recherchés

Promoteur et collaborateurs

  • AstraZeneca Promoteur

Groupes et interventions

  • Arm A: Investigational ArmEXPERIMENTAL

    Arm A is the sequence of induction with IsaVRd or DRd, apheresis, optional bridging therapy, lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine), and AZD0120.

  • Arm B: Control ArmACTIVE_COMPARATOR

    Arm B is the standard therapy induction with IsaVRd or DRd, followed by continuous IsaRd or DRd until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.

Interventions

  • Produit biologique AZD0120

    AZD0120, is a BCMA/CD19 dual CAR T-cell product, which is administered intravenously.

  • Médicament Bortezomib

    Induction therapy.

  • Médicament Cyclophosphamide

    Lymphodepletion

  • Produit biologique Daratumumab

    Induction, optional bridging and continuous therapy.

  • Médicament Dexamethasone

    Induction, optional bridging and continuous therapy.

  • Médicament Fludarabine

    Lymphodepletion

  • Produit biologique Isatuximab

    Induction, optional bridging and continuous therapy.

  • Médicament Lenalidomide

    Induction, optional bridging and continuous therapy.

Critères de jugement

  1. Critère de jugement principal

    PFS in NDMM who are ineligible to receive ASCT is measured to demonstrate the superiority of IsaVRd or DRd induction followed by AZD0120 compared to IsaVRd or DRd induction followed by continuous DRd or IsaRd.

    PFS: defined as time from randomisation until progression according to IMWG 2016 criteria as assessed by BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Délai Up to 9 years.

  2. Critère de jugement principal

    MRD negative CR rate at 9M in NDMM who are ineligible to receive ASCT is measured to demonstrate the superiority of IsaVRd or DRd induction followed by AZD0120 compared to IsaVRd or DRd induction followed by continuous DRd or IsaRd

    MRD negative CR rate at 9 months: defined as the proportion of participants with MRD negative status (at threshold of 10-5) and have a response of CR or sCR (according to the IMWG 2016 criteria) as assessed by BICR at 9 months (± 3 months) from randomisation before initiation of subsequent anti-myeloma therapy.

    Délai Up to 9 years.

  3. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Complete Response Rate

    The proportion of participants who achieved CR or better according to IMWG 2016 criteria, as assessed by BICR

    Délai Up to 9 years.

  4. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Overall Survival

    Time from randomisation until date of death due to any cause

    Délai Up to 9 years.

  5. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Number and percentage of participants with adverse events as graded by CTCAE v6 and ASTCT Consensus Grading criteria

    Adverse Event Incidence

    Délai Up to 9 years.

  6. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Concentration of Circulating CAR-T+ Cells in Peripheral Blood

    Quantification of circulating CAR-T+ cell levels by measuring CAR transgene in peripheral blood and CK parameters of AZD0120 will be measured to characterise the cellular kinetics of AZD0120 in blood.

    Délai Up to 9 years.

  7. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Number and percentage of participants with incidence of ADAs against AZD0120

    Assessment humoral immunogenicity of AZ0120 based on incidence of ADAs.

    Délai Up to 9 years.

  8. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Patient Reported Outcomes

    Change from baseline in bone pain severity measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Item Library 469 single bone pain item (EORTC IL469 - score range 0 - 100, with higher scores indicating worse bone pain) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation as initial therapy.

    Délai Up to 9 years.

  9. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Patient Reported Outcomes

    Change from baseline in fatigue severity, physical functioning, and global health status/quality of life measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 fatigue, physical functioning, and global health status/quality of life scales (EORTC QLQ-C30 - score range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate worse fatigue, better physical functioning, and better general health status/quality of life) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation as initial therapy.

    Délai Up to 9 years.

  10. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Overall Response Rate

    Proportion of participants who achieved PR or better according to IMWG 2016 criteria

    Délai Up to 9 years

  11. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Duration of Response

    Time from first documented confirmed response (PR or better) until date of documented PD per IMWG 2016 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Délai Up to 9 years

  12. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Time to Response

    Time from randomisation until the date of first documented objective response (PR or better), as assessed per IMWG 2016 criteria.

    Délai Up to 9 years

  13. Critère de jugement secondaire

    MRD negative CR rate

    Proportion of participants who have MRD negative status and have a response of CR or sCR (according to the IMWG 2016 criteria) at any time after the date of randomisation and before initiation of subsequent therapy.

    Délai Up to 9 years

  14. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Rate of sustained MRD negative CR

    Proportion of participants who have achieved MRD negative status and have a response of CR or sCR

    Délai Up to 9 years

  15. Critère de jugement secondaire

    Progression Free Survival 2 (PFS2)

    Time from randomisation to progression on next line of therapy, as assessed by Investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first

    Délai Up to 9 years

Dates

Dates
Date de début26 juin 2026 (réelle)
Achèvement principal11 janvier 2029 (estimée)
Achèvement12 mai 2034 (estimée)
Première publication14 août 2026 (réelle)
Dernière mise à jour14 août 2026
Résultats publiésNon précisé dans la fiche du registre
Statut vérifié pour la dernière foisaoût 2026

Réelle signifie que l'événement a eu lieu. Estimée signifie que le promoteur s'y attend. Les deux ont un sens différent.

Lieux

1 site est en recrutement

Australia

Australia
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Research SiteConcordPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteDarlinghurstPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteEast MelbournePas encore en recrutement
Research SiteFitzroyEn recrutement
Research SiteLiverpoolPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteMelbournePas encore en recrutement
Research SiteMurdochPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteWaratahPas encore en recrutement

Brazil

Brazil
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Research SiteSalvadorPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteSão PauloPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteSão PauloPas encore en recrutement

Canada

Canada
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Research SiteCalgaryAlbertaPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteHalifaxNova ScotiaPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteMontrealQuebecPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteOttawaOntarioPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteSherbrookeQuebecPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteVancouverBritish ColumbiaPas encore en recrutement

Denmark

Denmark
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Research SiteÅrhus NPas encore en recrutement

France

France
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Research SiteLillePas encore en recrutement
Research SiteNantesPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteParisPas encore en recrutement
Research SitePoitiersPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteToulousePas encore en recrutement

Germany

Germany
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Research SiteBerlinPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteColognePas encore en recrutement
Research SiteDresdenPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteEssenPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteFreiburg im BreisgauPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteHamburgPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteKielPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteLeipzigPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteMagdeburgPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteMainzPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteMünchenPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteNurembergPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteWürzburgPas encore en recrutement

Italy

Italy
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Research SiteBolognaPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteMilanPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteMilanPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteRomePas encore en recrutement
Research SiteRozzanoPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteTorinoPas encore en recrutement

Japan

Japan
ÉtablissementVilleÉtat ou régionStatut
Research SiteFukuokaPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteKyotoPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteNishinomiya-shiPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteOkayamaPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteSapporoPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteShibuya-kuPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteShinjuku-kuPas encore en recrutement
Research SiteSuita-shiPas encore en recrutement

74 sites supplémentaires sont indiqués dans la fiche du registre.

Documents de l'étude

Aucun document n'est lié dans cette fiche du registre.

Évolution au fil du temps

Aucun changement n'a été enregistré depuis que nous avons intégré cette fiche pour la première fois.

Un changement est enregistré chaque fois que le promoteur met à jour la fiche du registre. Le statut, les dates, le recrutement et les sites apparaissent ici au fur et à mesure de leur évolution.