דילוג לתוכן הראשי
xMedica

NCT04634240ClinicalTrials.gov

Staged Complete Revascularization for Coronary Artery Disease vs Medical Management Alone in Patients With AS Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Study of Staged Complete Revascularization With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Treat Coronary Artery Disease vs Medical Management Alone in Patients With Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis Undergoing Elective Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The COMPLETE TAVR Study

מגייסמקבל משתתפים כעת, לפי רשומת המרשם.
יצירת קשר עם המחקר

בקצרה

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) often have concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) which may adversely affect prognosis. There is uncertainty about the benefits and the optimal timing of revascularization for such patients. There is currently clinical equipoise regarding…

התערבותידרושים 4,000 משתתפים72 אתרים2 מדינות

קטגוריות

רשום במרשם אחד

מחקר יחיד יכול להיות רשום בכמה מרשמים. אנו מציגים אותו פעם אחת ומקשרים לכל רשומה שברשותנו.

מידע הניסוי מוצג כפי שפורסם על ידי המרשם, בשפת המקור שלו.

מתעניינים במחקר הזה?

התחברות או צרו חשבון כדי לרשום את התעניינותכם ולעקוב אחר המחקר הזה.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2020-11-18; recorded start 2020-12-19
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
  • Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
  • Present: Uses blinding (masking)A masking level is recorded in the record
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 301 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (University of British Columbia)
  • Not stated: No posted results from this sponsor are in this database yetBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 3 conditions.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: other.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourSTRONG

A strong methodological design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation20/20

    Participants are randomly allocated between arms

  • Blinding7/20

    Single-blind

  • Control arm0/15

    No comparator arm stated in the record

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type10/10

    Mortality / MACE endpoint (hard clinical outcome)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 72 sites

  • Data monitoring committee7/7

    A data monitoring committee is in place

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleLARGE

A large study, international in scope: 4,000 participants (target), run at 72 sites, across 2 countries.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment35/40

    4,000 participants (target)

  • Site count21/25

    72 sites

  • Country count7/15

    2 countries

  • Planned duration10/10

    Planned over about 64 months

  • Sponsor scale9/10

    University of British Columbia has led 297 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

תקציר

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) often have concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) which may adversely affect prognosis. There is uncertainty about the benefits and the optimal timing of revascularization for such patients. There is currently clinical equipoise regarding the management of concomitant CAD in patients undergoing TAVR. Some centers perform routine revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (either before or after TAVR), while others follow an alternative strategy of medical management. The potential benefits and optimal timing of PCI in these patients are unknown. As TAVR expands to lower risk patients, and potentially becomes the preferred therapy for the majority of patients with severe aortic stenosis, the optimal management of concomitant coronary artery disease will be of increasing importance. The COMPLETE TAVR study will determine whether, on a background of guideline-directed medical therapy, a strategy of complete revascularization involving staged PCI using drug eluting stents to treat all suitable coronary artery lesions is superior to a strategy of medical therapy alone in reducing the composite outcome of Cardiovascular Death, new Myocardial Infarction, Ischemia-driven Revascularization or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina or Heart Failure. The study will be a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial with blinded adjudication of outcomes. Patients will be screened and consented for elective transfemoral TAVR and randomized within 96 hours of successful balloon expandable TAVR. Complete Revascularization: Staged PCI using third generation drug eluting stents to treat all suitable coronary artery lesions in vessels that are at least 2.5 mm in diameter and that are amenable to treatment with PCI and have a ≥70% visual angiographic diameter stenosis. Staged PCI can occur any time from 1 to 45 days post successful transfemoral TAVR. Vs. Medical Therapy Alone: No further revascularization of coronary artery lesions. All patients, regardless of randomized treatment allocation, will receive guideline-directed medical therapy consisting of risk factor modification and use of evidence-based therapies. The COMPLETE TAVR study will help address the current lack of evidence in this area. It will likely impact both the global delivery of health care and the management and clinical outcomes of all patients undergoing TAVR with concomitant CAD.

מצבים רפואיים

  • Coronary Stenosis
  • Aortic Stenosis
  • Coronary Artery Disease

זכאות

זכאות
מיןהכול
גילאיםלא צוין ברשומת המרשם
מתנדבים בריאיםלא

זכאות כפי שנכתבה במרשם

Inclusion Criteria: \- Symptomatic aortic valve stenosis prior to TAVR (NYHA Functional Class ≥ 2 OR Abnormal exercise test with severe SOB, abnormal BP response, or arrhythmia) AND \- CAD defined as: at least 1 coronary artery lesion of ≥70% visual angiographic diameter stenosis in a native segment ≥2.5 mm in diameter that is not a CTO and is amenable to treatment with PCI AND \- Consensus by the Local Multidisciplinary Heart Team that the patient is suitable for elective transfemoral TAVR with a balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve AND would receive a bypass with an anastomosis distal to the coronary artery lesion(s) if they were undergoing SAVR. Local Multidisciplinary Heart Teams are expected to follow current clinical guidelines for selection of patients for TAVR with an eligible patient generally expected to have: \[AVA ≤ 1.0 cm2 OR AVA index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2\] OR \[Jet velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s OR mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg\] OR patients without these criteria may undergo TAVR if the Local Multidisciplinary Heart Team concludes it is appropriate. AND \- Successful transfemoral TAVR, defined as the implantation of a single transcatheter aortic valve within the past 96 hours with freedom from more than minimal aortic insufficiency, stroke, or major vascular complications. Exclusion Criteria: * PCI already performed within 90 days prior to TAVR or at the same time as the index transfemoral TAVR procedure * Planned PCI of coronary artery lesion(s) * Planned surgical revascularization of coronary artery lesion(s) * Non-cardiovascular co-morbidity reducing life expectancy to \< 5 years * Any factor precluding 5-year follow-up * Prior coronary artery bypass grafting surgery or surgical valve replacement * Severe mitral regurgitation (\> 3+) * Severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF \< 30%) * Low coronary takeoff (high risk for coronary obstruction) * Acute myocardial infarction within 90 days * Stroke or transient ischemic attack within 90 days * Renal insufficiency (eGFR \< 30 ml/min) and/or renal replacement Rx * Hemodynamic or respiratory instability

זכאות במשפטים פשוטים

הקריטריונים של רשומה זו טרם פורקו למשפטים נפרדים. טקסט המרשם שלמעלה שלם והוא הגרסה המחייבת.

תכנון המחקר

תכנון המחקר
סוג המחקרהתערבותי
שלבלא רלוונטי
הקצאהאקראי
מודל ההתערבותPARALLEL
מטרה ראשיתTREATMENT
הסתרהSINGLE (1)
גיוסדרושים 4,000 משתתפים

נותן חסות ושותפים

  • University of British Columbia נותן חסות

זרועות והתערבויות

  • Complete RevascularizationEXPERIMENTAL

    Routine PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) of all suitable coronary artery stenoses of ≥70% in vessels ≥2.5mm in diameter.

  • Medical Therapy AloneNO_INTERVENTION

    No revascularization of coronary artery lesions.

התערבויות

  • פרוצדורה Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)

    PCI of all qualifying lesions.

מדדי תוצאה

  1. מדד תוצאה ראשוני

    Composite of Cardiovascular Death or New Myocardial Infarction or Ischemia-Driven Revascularization or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina or Heart Failure

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  2. מדד תוצאה משני

    Cardiovascular Death or New Myocardial Infarction

    Deaths will be classified as cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular. All deaths with a clear cardiovascular or unknown cause, will be classified as cardiovascular. However, within cardiovascular deaths, hemorrhagic deaths will be clearly identified. Only deaths due to a documented non-cardiovascular cause (e.g., cancer) will be classified as non-cardiovascular. Myocardial Infarction will be defined according to the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, with modification for Type 4a (PCI-related) and Type 5 (CABG-related) as defined for the ISCHEMIA trial and as used in the COMPLETE trial.

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  3. מדד תוצאה משני

    Transaortic gradient immediately post-TAVR (echocardiographically-derived vs. direct invasive measurement)

    מסגרת זמן Immediately post-TAVR

  4. מדד תוצאה משני

    Transaortic Gradient Reclassification

    Proportion of patients developing echocardiographic aortic gradient ≥20 mmHg who are found to have a gradient \< 20 mmHg on direct hemodynamic assessment.

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  5. מדד תוצאה משני

    VARC-3 Hemodynamic Valve Deterioration Reclassification

    Proportion of patients developing ≥ moderate echocardiographic VARC-3 valve deterioration reclassified to \< moderate VARC-3 valve deterioration using direct invasive methods, including mean gradient and valve area.

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  6. מדד תוצאה משני

    Severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch (PPM) Reclassification

    Proportion of patients with echocardiographic severe PPM immediately post-TAVR, reclassified as non-severe PPM using direct invasive methods.

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  7. מדד תוצאה משני

    Composite of CV Death, New MI, IDR or Hospitalization for UA or for HF in patients with PPM and elevated gradients vs those without

    Deaths: will be classified as cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular. All deaths with a clear cardiovascular or unknown cause, will be classified as cardiovascular. However, within cardiovascular deaths, hemorrhagic deaths will be clearly identified. Only deaths due to a documented non-cardiovascular cause (e.g., cancer) will be classified as non-cardiovascular. Myocardial Infarction: will be defined according to the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, with modification for Type 4a (PCI-related) and Type 5 (CABG-related) as defined for the ISCHEMIA trial and as used in the COMPLETE trial. Hospital admission: for protocol-defined unstable angina, new/worsening NYHA Class IV heart failure, or for protocol-defined Ischemia-driven revascularization, among patients with patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM), elevated echocardiography-derived transaortic gradients and elevated direct invasive transaortic gradient vs those without.

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  8. מדד תוצאה משני

    Composite outcome of mean echocardiographic gradient ≥ 20mmHg, severe PPM, ≥ moderate AR, thrombosis, endocarditis, and aortic valve re-intervention

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  9. מדד תוצאה משני

    Cardiovascular Death

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  10. מדד תוצאה משני

    New Myocardial Infarction

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  11. מדד תוצאה משני

    Ischemia-Driven Revascularization

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  12. מדד תוצאה משני

    Hospitalization for Unstable Angina or Heart Failure

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  13. מדד תוצאה משני

    All-cause Mortality

    Includes deaths from both cardiac and non-cardiac causes

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  14. מדד תוצאה משני

    Stroke

    Defined as the presence of a new focal neurologic deficit thought to be vascular in origin, with signs or symptoms lasting more than 24 hours. It is strongly recommended (but not required) that an imaging procedure such as CT scan or MRI be performed. Stroke will be further classified as ischemic, hemorrhagic or type uncertain.

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  15. מדד תוצאה משני

    Bleeding

    Clinically overt, symptomatic bleeding with at least one of the following criteria: * Fatal, or * Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or * Retroperitoneal hemorrhage, or * Intraocular hemorrhage leading to significant vision loss, or * Decrease in hemoglobin of 3.0 g/dL (with each blood transfusion unit counting for 1.0 g/dL of Hb) or requiring transfusion of two or more units of red blood cells or equivalent of whole blood. * Requiring surgical intervention to stop the bleeding

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  16. מדד תוצאה משני

    Angina status

    As evaluated by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  17. מדד תוצאה משני

    Economic evaluation

    Includes health resource utilization, costs, and cost-effectiveness

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  18. מדד תוצאה משני

    Patient-reported outcomes

    Health-related quality of life as evaluated by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter.

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  19. מדד תוצאה משני

    Contrast-associated acute kidney injury

    An absolute rise in serum creatinine of greater than or equal to 44 μmol/L from baseline and/or a relative rise in serum creatinine of ≥25% compared to baseline at any time between 48hrs and 96hrs post-procedure.

    מסגרת זמן Median follow-up of 3.5 years

  20. מדד תוצאה משני

    Fluoroscopic time for Staged PCI procedure

    Total time under fluoroscopy

    מסגרת זמן During PCI procedure

  21. מדד תוצאה משני

    Contrast Utilization for Stages PCI Procedure

    מסגרת זמן During PCI procedure

תאריכים

תאריכים
תאריך התחלה19 בדצמבר 2020 (בפועל)
סיום ראשוני1 באפריל 2026 (משוער)
סיום1 באפריל 2026 (משוער)
פורסם לראשונה18 בנובמבר 2020 (בפועל)
עודכן לאחרונה24 ביולי 2025
התוצאות פורסמולא צוין ברשומת המרשם
המצב אומת לאחרונהיולי 2025

בפועל פירושו שהאירוע התרחש. משוער פירושו שנותן החסות צופה אותו. שתי המשמעויות שונות זו מזו.

מיקומים

71 אתרים מגייסים

Canada

Canada
מתקןעירמדינה או אזורמצב
University of Alberta, Mazankowski Heart InstituteEdmontonAlbertaמגייס
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreHalifaxNova Scotiaמגייס
Hamilton Health SciencesHamiltonOntarioמגייס
Sacré-CoeurMontrealQuebecמגייס
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de MontréalMontrealQuebecמגייס
Montréal HeartMontrealQuebecמגייס
Royal Columbian HospitalNew WestminsterBritish Columbiaמגייס
Ottawa HeartOttawaOntarioמגייס
Prairie VascularReginaSaskatchewanמגייס
New Brunswick HeartSaint JohnNew Brunswickמגייס
CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUSSherbrookeQuebecמגייס
St. Michael's HospitalTorontoOntarioמגייס
Sunnybrook HospitalTorontoOntarioמגייס
Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation-Centre d'Innovation Cardiovasculaire (CCI-CIC)VancouverBritish Columbiaטרם מגייס
Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBritish Columbiaמגייס
St. Paul's HospitalVancouverBritish Columbiaמגייס
Saint BonifaceWinnipegManitobaמגייס

United States

United States
מתקןעירמדינה או אזורמצב
Summa Health SystemAkronOhioמגייס
PiedmontAtlantaGeorgiaמגייס
JFK Medical CenterAtlantisFloridaמגייס
St. Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterBoiseIdahoמגייס
Tufts MedicalBostonMassachusettsמגייס
Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsמגייס
University at BuffaloBuffaloNew Yorkמגייס
University of Vermont Medical CenterBurlingtonVermontמגייס
Our Lady of LourdesCamdenNew Jerseyמגייס
Novant Health Heart and Vascular InstituteCharlotteNorth Carolinaמגייס
Ascension Alexian BrothersChicagoIllinoisמגייס
Kaiser Permanente NorthwestClackamasOregonמגייס
Boone HospitalColumbiaMissouriמגייס
Mount CarmelColumbusOhioמגייס
Midwest Cardiovascular Research and Education FoundationElkhartIndianaמגייס
Parkview Research CenterFort WayneIndianaמגייס
Northeast Georgia Health SystemGainesvilleGeorgiaמגייס
Methodist Le Bonheur HealthcareGermantownTennesseeמגייס
Bellin Health SystemGreen BayWisconsinמגייס
HCA Houston Healthcare Medical CenterHoustonTexasמגייס
Huntsville Heart CenterHuntsvilleAlabamaמגייס
Baptist Health JacksonvilleJacksonvilleFloridaמגייס
University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityKansasמגייס
Ballad Health CVA Heart InstituteKingsportTennesseeמגייס
Parkwest Medical CenterKnoxvilleTennesseeמגייס
Sparrow Clinical Research InstituteLansingMichiganמגייס
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonNew Hampshireמגייס
Bryan HeartLincolnNebraskaמגייס
Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic/Baptist MemorialMemphisTennesseeמגייס
Miami Cardiac and Vascular/Baptist HospitalMiamiFloridaמגייס
Ascension Columbia St. Mary'sMilwaukeeWisconsinמגייס
NYU Langone Hospital - Long IslandMineolaNew Yorkמגייס
University of Minnesota Medical CenterMinneapolisMinnesotaמגייס

22 אתרים נוספים מצוינים ברשומת המרשם.

מסמכי המחקר

לא צורפו מסמכים ברשומת מרשם זו.

שינויים לאורך זמן

לא נרשמו שינויים מאז שקלטנו רשומה זו לראשונה.

שינוי נרשם בכל פעם שנותן החסות מעדכן את רשומת המרשם. מצב, תאריכים, גיוס ואתרים מופיעים כאן ככל שהם משתנים.