Vai al contenuto principale
xMedica

NCT05061004ClinicalTrials.gov

Cephea Early Feasibility Study

In reclutamentoAccetta partecipanti ora, secondo la scheda del registro.
Contatta questo studio

In breve

The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effectiveness of the Cephea Mitral Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) in…

Interventistico90 partecipanti ricercati22 centri2 paesi

Categorie

Registrato in 1 registro

Uno studio può essere registrato in più registri. Lo mostriamo una volta sola e colleghiamo ogni scheda in nostro possesso.

Le informazioni sulla sperimentazione sono mostrate così come pubblicate dal registro, nella lingua originale.

Ti interessa questo studio?

Accedi oppure crea un account per registrare il tuo interesse e seguire questo studio.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2021-09-29; recorded start 2022-04-28
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Not stated: Participants are not randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as non-randomised
  • Not stated: A comparison group is not stated in the registry recordThe record describes a single study arm
  • Not stated: Open label (no blinding)Masking is recorded as none (open label)
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 82 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Abbott Medical Devices)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 1 condition.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourEXPLORATORY

An exploratory-stage design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation0/20

    Allocation not stated in the record

  • Blinding0/20

    Open-label

  • Control arm0/15

    No comparator arm stated in the record

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type3/10

    Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 22 sites

  • Data monitoring committee0/7

    Data monitoring committee not stated in the record

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleSMALL

A small study, international in scope: 90 participants (target), run at 22 sites, across 2 countries.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment15/40

    50 participants (target)

  • Site count16/25

    22 sites

  • Country count7/15

    2 countries

  • Planned duration10/10

    Planned over about 108 months

  • Sponsor scale7/10

    Abbott Medical Devices has led 83 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Sintesi

The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effectiveness of the Cephea Mitral Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) in whom transcatheter therapy is deemed more appropriate than open heart surgery.

Patologie

  • Mitral Regurgitation

Idoneità

Idoneità
SessoTutti
Età18 YearsNessun massimo
Volontari saniNo

Idoneità come riportata nel registro

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Mitral valve disease resulting in mitral regurgitation (MR ≥ Grade III) and/or severe mitral valve stenosis (mitral valve area ≤ 1.5cm² and/or mean transmitral gradient ≥10 mmHg at normal heart rate) per American Society of Echocardiography criteria. * LVEF ≥ 30% * In the judgement of the Site Heart Team, transcatheter therapy is deemed more appropriate than open heart surgery. Key Exclusion Criteria: * Prior surgical or interventional treatment that interferes with the Cephea valve delivery or function. * Need for emergent or urgent surgery.

Idoneità in frasi semplici

I criteri di questa scheda non sono ancora stati suddivisi in affermazioni distinte. Il testo del registro qui sopra è completo ed è la versione autorevole.

Disegno dello studio

Disegno dello studio
Tipo di studioInterventistico
FaseNon applicabile
AssegnazioneNon applicabile
Modello di interventoSINGLE_GROUP
Finalità principaleTREATMENT
MascheramentoNONE (0)
Arruolamento90 partecipanti ricercati

Sponsor e collaboratori

  • Abbott Medical Devices Sponsor

Bracci e interventi

  • TreatmentEXPERIMENTAL

    Treatment of symptomatic patients with mitral valve disease (including mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and mixed mitral valve disease) with the Cephea Mitral Valve System

Interventi

  • Dispositivo Cephea Mitral Valve System

    Transcatheter mitral valve replacement

Esiti misurati

  1. Esito primario

    Primary Safety Endpoint

    Freedom from all-cause mortality, which will be assessed at 30 days post implant.

    Orizzonte temporale 30 days post implant

  2. Esito primario

    Primary Effectiveness Endpoint

    Proportion of subjects with reduction of MR to ≤ Grade I, will be assessed at 30 days post implant.

    Orizzonte temporale 30 days post implant

Date

Date
Data di inizio28 aprile 2022 (effettiva)
Conclusione primaria31 dicembre 2026 (stimata)
Conclusione1 marzo 2031 (stimata)
Prima pubblicazione29 settembre 2021 (effettiva)
Ultimo aggiornamento11 settembre 2026
Risultati pubblicatiNon indicato nella scheda del registro
Stato verificato l'ultima voltadicembre 2025

«Effettiva» significa che l'evento è avvenuto. «Stimata» significa che lo sponsor lo prevede. Le due cose non sono equivalenti.

Centri

20 centri stanno reclutando

Canada

Canada
StrutturaCittàStato o regioneStato
Institut de Cardiologie de MontrealMontrealQuebecCompletato
IUCPQ-ULavalQuébecQuebecRitirato

United States

United States
StrutturaCittàStato o regioneStato
University of Michigan - Davis Medical CenterAnn ArborMichiganIn reclutamento
Piedmont Heart InstituteAtlantaGeorgiaIn reclutamento
Emory University HospitalAtlantaGeorgiaIn reclutamento
Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical CenterCharlotteNorth CarolinaIn reclutamento
Northwestern Memorial HospitalChicagoIllinoisIn reclutamento
The Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhioIn reclutamento
Houston MethodistHoustonTexasIn reclutamento
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaIn reclutamento
Minneapolis Heart InstituteMinneapolisMinnesotaIn reclutamento
Ascension Saint ThomasNashvilleTennesseeIn reclutamento
Vanderbilt Heart & Vascular InstituteNashvilleTennesseeIn reclutamento
New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkIn reclutamento
Sentara Norfolk General HospitalNorfolkVirginiaIn reclutamento
Banner-University Medical Center PhoenixPhoenixArizonaIn reclutamento
Allegheny General Hospital - ASRIPittsburghPennsylvaniaIn reclutamento
University of California - Davis Medical CenterSacramentoCaliforniaIn reclutamento
Swedish Medical CenterSeattleWashingtonIn reclutamento
Montefiore Medical Center - Moses CampusThe BronxNew YorkIn reclutamento
Los Robles Regional Medical CenterThousand OaksCaliforniaIn reclutamento
Ascension Via Christi Hospitals WichitaWichitaKansasIn reclutamento

Documenti dello studio

In questa scheda del registro non sono collegati documenti.

Modifiche nel tempo

  1. 11 settembre 2026

    Obiettivo di arruolamento modificato

    Enrollment target revised up from 50 to 90

    5090