NCT06122077ClinicalTrials.gov
Clinical Validation of Freenome Multiomics Blood Test for Lung Cancer Screening
The PROACT LUNG Study: A Prospective, Observational,Clinical Validation Study of the Freenome Multiomics Blood Test for Lung Cancer Screening (FRNM-007)
In brief
The PROACT LUNG study is a prospective multi-center observational study to validate a blood-based test for the early detection of lung cancer by collecting blood samples from high-risk participants who will undergo a routine, standard-of-care screening Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT).
Observational20,000 participants sought36 sites1 country
Categories
Registered in 1 registry
- ClinicalTrials.govNCT06122077Open this record at ClinicalTrials.govSynced 2 months ago
One study can be registered in several registries. We show it once and link every record we hold.
Trial information is shown as published by the registry, in its original language.
Interested in this study?
Sign in or create an account to register your interest and follow this study.
How this study is set up
The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.
- Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2023-11-08; recorded start 2023-11-28
- Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
- Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
- Not stated: Whether participants are randomly assigned is not stated in the registry recordNo allocation method is recorded
- Not stated: Whether there is a comparison group is not stated in the registry recordThe record does not describe the study arms
- Not stated: Whether the study is blinded is not stated in the registry recordNo masking information is recorded
- Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
- Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
- Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
- Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
- Present: Sponsor has 1 other study in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Freenome Holdings Inc.)
- Not stated: No posted results from this sponsor are in this database yetBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
- The record lists 1 condition.
- Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
Trial stature
Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.
An exploratory-stage design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.
How this score is built
- Randomised allocation0/20
Allocation not stated in the record
- Blinding0/20
Masking not stated in the record
- Control arm0/15
No comparator arm stated in the record
- Primary-outcome specificity10/10
Named primary outcome with a defined time frame
- Endpoint type3/10
Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)
- Multi-centre8/8
Multi-centre: 36 sites
- Data monitoring committee7/7
A data monitoring committee is in place
- Prospective registration5/5
Registered before the study start date
- Protocol / SAP posted0/5
No protocol or SAP posted to the registry
A very large study: 20,000 participants (target), run at 36 sites.
How this score is built
- Enrolment40/40
20,000 participants (target)
- Site count18/25
36 sites
- Country count0/15
Single country
- Planned duration9/10
Planned over about 43 months
- Sponsor scale1/10
Freenome Holdings Inc. has led 2 trials in our corpus
We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.
How this score is built
- Investigator standing0/100
No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial
These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.
Summary
The PROACT LUNG study is a prospective multi-center observational study to validate a blood-based test for the early detection of lung cancer by collecting blood samples from high-risk participants who will undergo a routine, standard-of-care screening Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT).
Conditions
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis
Eligibility
| Sex | All |
|---|---|
| Ages | 50 Years – No maximum |
| Healthy volunteers | No |
| Sampling method | PROBABILITY_SAMPLE |
Study population
The study aims to enroll a representative sample of the population across the United States including adults aged 50 years and older who have at least a 20-pack-year smoking history and who have met the eligibility criteria defined in this protocol.
Eligibility as written in the registry
Eligibility in plain statements
This record's criteria have not been broken into separate statements yet. The registry text above is complete and is the authoritative version.
Study design
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Phase | Not stated in the registry record |
| Allocation | Not stated in the registry record |
| Intervention model | Not stated in the registry record |
| Primary purpose | Not stated in the registry record |
| Masking | Not stated in the registry record |
| Enrolment | 20,000 participants sought |
Sponsor and collaborators
- Freenome Holdings Inc. Sponsor
Interventions
- Diagnostic test blood draw
Subjects who provide informed consent and meet the eligibility criteria will have 50 ml of blood collected and sent to Freenome or Freenome's designee for processing, testing, and storage, and will then complete a standard-of-care screening LDCT.
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Sensitivity and specificity in detecting lung cancer
Clinical performance of the Freenome Blood Test, including sensitivity and specificity, in detecting lung cancer in subjects with positive and negative lung cancer outcomes during a 12-month follow-up period
Time frame 12-Months
Secondary outcome
Sensitivity and specificity in detecting lung cancer
Clinical performance of the Freenome Blood Test, including sensitivity and specificity, in detecting lung cancer in subjects with positive and negative lung cancer outcomes during a 24-month follow-up period
Time frame 24-Months
Dates
| Start date | November 28, 2023 (actual) |
|---|---|
| Primary completion | June 15, 2026 (estimated) |
| Completion | June 15, 2027 (estimated) |
| First posted | November 8, 2023 (actual) |
| Last updated | August 5, 2025 |
| Results posted | Not stated in the registry record |
| Status last verified | August 2025 |
Actual means the event happened. Estimated means the sponsor expects it. The two mean different things.
Locations
36 sites are recruiting
United States
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ascension St. Agnes Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | Recruiting |
| Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital | Binghamton | New York | Recruiting |
| Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) | Charleston | South Carolina | Recruiting |
| University of Chicago | Chicago | Illinois | Recruiting |
| Hillcrest Medical Research | DeLand | Florida | Recruiting |
| Walgreens | Deerfield | Illinois | Recruiting |
| Universal Axon Clinical Research | Doral | Florida | Recruiting |
| Clinical Research Associates of Central PA | DuBois | Pennsylvania | Recruiting |
| McLeod Health | Florence | South Carolina | Recruiting |
| SpeciCare, Inc | Gainesville | Georgia | Recruiting |
| Altru Health System | Grand Forks | North Dakota | Recruiting |
| Memorial Hospital at Gulfport | Gulfport | Mississippi | Recruiting |
| Horizon Clinical Research Group | Houston | Texas | Recruiting |
| Cape Cod Hospital | Hyannis | Massachusetts | Recruiting |
| The Jackson Clinic, PA | Jackson | Tennessee | Recruiting |
| I.H.S Health, LLC | Kissimmee | Florida | Recruiting |
| US Digestive Health at Lancaster | Lancaster | Pennsylvania | Recruiting |
| Aton Health | Leawood | Kansas | Recruiting |
| Science 37 | Los Angeles | California | Recruiting |
| Ascension Columbia St. Mary's Wisconsin | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | Recruiting |
| Inspira Medical Center | Mullica Hill | New Jersey | Recruiting |
| Hightower Clinical | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | Recruiting |
| Temple University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | Recruiting |
| Circle Clinical Research | Pierre | South Dakota | Recruiting |
| United Medical Research | Port Orange | Florida | Recruiting |
| Oregon Health & Science University | Portland | Oregon | Recruiting |
| Wakemed | Raleigh | North Carolina | Recruiting |
| Renown Regional Medical Center | Reno | Nevada | Recruiting |
| Guthrie Medical Group | Sayre | Pennsylvania | Recruiting |
| Springfield Clinic, LLP | Springfield | Illinois | Recruiting |
| Stamford Hospital | Stamford | Connecticut | Recruiting |
| Charter Research | The Villages | Florida | Recruiting |
| CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Health System | Tyler | Texas | Recruiting |
| Ascension Via Christi Wichita | Wichita | Kansas | Recruiting |
| Charter Research | Winter Park | Florida | Recruiting |
| US Digestive Health at Wyomissing | Wyomissing | Pennsylvania | Recruiting |
Study documents
No documents are linked in this registry record.
Changes over time
No changes have been recorded since we first ingested this record.
A change is recorded each time the sponsor updates the registry record. Status, dates, enrolment and sites appear here as they move.