Skip to main content
xMedica

NCT07321652ClinicalTrials.gov

Testing the Addition of Anti-Cancer Drug Sonrotoclax, to the Standard Treatment Zanubrutinib, for Previously Untreated CLL/SLL

Phase III Evaluation of Fixed Duration Zanubrutinib Plus Sonrotoclax-Based Therapy Compared to Continuous Zanubrutinib in Previously Untreated Older Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL)

RecruitingTaking participants now, according to the registry record.
Contact this study

In brief

This phase III trial compares the effect of adding sonrotoclax to zanubrutinib versus zanubrutinib alone for the treatment of patients with untreated chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Sonrotoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2)…

Phase 3466 participants sought210 sites1 country

Categories

Registered in 1 registry

One study can be registered in several registries. We show it once and link every record we hold.

Trial information is shown as published by the registry, in its original language.

Interested in this study?

Sign in or create an account to register your interest and follow this study.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2026-01-07; recorded start 2026-04-30
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
  • Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
  • Not stated: Open label (no blinding)Masking is recorded as none (open label)
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 95 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 2 conditions.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: other.
  • Intervention regulatory context: investigational, within a phased regulatory pathway.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourSTRONG

A strong methodological design for a phase 3 study, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation20/20

    Participants are randomly allocated between arms

  • Blinding0/20

    Open-label

  • Control arm15/15

    Active-comparator control arm

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type10/10

    Mortality / MACE endpoint (hard clinical outcome)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 152 sites

  • Data monitoring committee0/7

    No data monitoring committee stated

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleMEDIUM

A medium-sized study: 466 participants (target), run at 210 sites.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment26/40

    466 participants (target)

  • Site count24/25

    152 sites

  • Country count0/15

    Single country

  • Planned duration10/10

    Planned over about 151 months

  • Sponsor scale7/10

    Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology has led 96 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Summary

This phase III trial compares the effect of adding sonrotoclax to zanubrutinib versus zanubrutinib alone for the treatment of patients with untreated chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Sonrotoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Zanubrutinib is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It blocks a protein called BTK, which is present on B-cell (a type of white blood cells) cancers such as mantel cell lymphoma at abnormal levels. This may help keep cancer cells from growing and spreading. Giving sonrotoclax and zanubrutinib may be more effective than zanubrutinib alone for the treatment of untreated CLL/SLL.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the progression free survival (PFS) between minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided zanubrutinib sonrotoclax therapy to continuous zanubrutinib as control. II. To determine the PFS comparing fixed duration zanubrutinib sonrotoclax therapy to continuous zanubrutinib as control. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the PFS between the patients with MRD-detectable disease treated with fixed duration zanubrutinib sonrotoclax to the PFS of the patients with MRD detectable disease who receive one additional year of combination therapy. II. To determine the overall survival of all arms of the study. III. To determine the frequency of patients with MRD-detectable disease who convert to undetectable MRD, and at what depth and for how long, after receiving an extra year of combination therapy on the MRD-guided zanubrutinib sonrotoclax therapy arm. IV. To determine and compare the overall response rate (ORR defined as PR, CR, CCR, CRi) and complete remission rate (CR) after 14 cycles of therapy among the three arms. V. To compare time to the next CLL/SLL therapy among treatment arms. VI. To determine the rates and severity of toxicity in each arm, with a particular focus on adverse events of special interest that include infections, cardiovascular events (arrhythmias, heart failure, hypertension), tumor lysis syndrome, bleeding events, cytopenias, and second malignancies. VII. To compare patient-reported symptomatic adverse events as assessed by the Patient Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) between arms 1 and 2. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the best achieved rate of undetectable MRD (uMRD) between the fixed duration zanubrutinib sonrotoclax arm and the MRD guided zanubrutinib sonrotoclax arm. II. To compare rates of undetectable MRD measured by the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) sequencing assay ClonoSeq (sensitivity 1 in 10\^-6) to undetectable MRD measured by standard six-color flow cytometry (uMRD4), and to compare results from bone marrow to peripheral blood. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM 1: Patients receive zanubrutinib orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo restaging starting at cycle 15 day 1. Patients with at least partial remission continue therapy as described above. Patients with progressive disease proceed to follow up. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan, bone marrow aspiration and blood sample collection throughout the study. ARM 2: Patients receive zanubrutinib PO BID on days 1-28 of each cycle. Starting cycle 4 day 1 patients also receive sonrotoclax PO daily (QD) on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo restaging starting at cycle 15 day 1. Patients with undetectable MRD and a response of PR, partial response with persistent lymphocytosis (PR-L), CR, CCR or CRi stop therapy at cycle 15 day 28 and proceed to follow up. Patients with detectable MRD and an objective response to therapy are re-randomized to arm 2B or arm 2C. ARM 2B: Patients continue zanubrutinib PO BID sonrotoclax PO QD on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for an additonal 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM 2C: Patients discontinue therapy starting at cycle 15 day 28 and proceed to follow up. Patients undergo CT scan, bone marrow aspiration and blood sample collection throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 3 years then every 6 months until 10 years for study registration. Patients with progression or the start of non protocol CLL directed therapy are followed every 6 months for 10 years from registration.

Conditions

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Small Lymphocytic Leukemia

Eligibility

Eligibility
SexAll
Ages65 YearsNo maximum
Healthy volunteersNo

Eligibility as written in the registry

Inclusion Criteria: * STEP 0: This bone marrow or peripheral blood submission to Adaptive is mandatory prior to registration/randomization for real-time identification of the clone needed for MRD testing. The bone marrow sample should be from the first aspiration (i.e., first pull). Aspirate needle should be redirected if needed to get first pull bone marrow aspirate. It should be obtained as soon after pre-registration as possible to confirm registration eligibility * STEP 0: Patients must be diagnosed with CLL/SLL according to International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2018 criteria that includes all of the following: * ≥ 5 x10\^9 /L B lymphocytes (5000/μL) in the peripheral blood (CLL) or a lymph node biopsy demonstrating SLL with the below immunophenotype (SLL) * On morphologic review, the leukemic cells must be small mature lymphocytes * Immunophenotype of CLL cells (performed locally) must reveal a clonal B-cell population, which coexpress the B cell surface markers of CD19 and CD20, as well as the T-cell antigen CD5. Patients with bright surface immunoglobulin expression or lack of CD23 expression in \> 10% of cells must lack t(11;14) translocation by interphase cytogenetics * STEP 0: Patients must meet criteria for treatment as defined by IWCLL 2018 guidelines which includes at least one of the following criteria: * Evidence of marrow failure as manifested by the development or worsening of anemia or thrombocytopenia (not attributable to autoimmune hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia), typically hemoglobin (Hb) \< 10 g/dL, platelet count \< 100,000/mm\^3 * Massive (\> 6 cm below the costal margin), progressive or symptomatic splenomegaly * Massive nodes (ie, \> 10 cm in longest diameter) or progressive or symptomatic lymphadenopathy * Autoimmune anemia and/or thrombocytopenia that is poorly responsive to standard therapy * Constitutional symptoms, which include any of the following: * Unintentional weight loss of ≥ 10% within the previous 6 months * Significant fatigue (ie. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group \[ECOG\] performance status \[PS\] ≥ 2) * Fevers \>100.5 °F or 38.0°C for 2 weeks or more without evidence of infection * Night sweats \> 1 month without evidence of infection * STEP 0: Patients must not have had prior therapy for CLL (except palliative steroids or treatment of autoimmune complications of CLL with rituximab or steroids) * STEP 0: Treatment with rituximab and/or high-dose corticosteroids for autoimmune complications of CLL must be completed prior to enrollment. Palliative steroids must be at a dose not higher than 20 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent corticosteroid at the time of registration * STEP 0: Age ≥ 65 years * STEP 0: ECOG performance status ≤ 2 * STEP 0: Patients with known HIV infection on effective anti-retroviral therapy with undetectable viral load within 6 months prior to registration are eligible for this trial * STEP 0: For patients with evidence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the HBV viral load must be undetectable on suppressive therapy, if indicated * STEP 0: Patients with a history of hepatitis C virus (HCV), infection must have been treated and cured. For patients with HCV infection who are currently on treatment, they are eligible if they have an undetectable HCV viral load * STEP 0: Patients must not be receiving active systemic anticoagulation with warfarin. Patients must be off warfarin therapy for at least 5 half-lives washout and with normal INR prior to enrollment * STEP 0: Patients with known history or current symptoms of cardiac disease, or history of treatment with cardiotoxic agents, should have a clinical risk assessment of cardiac function using the New York Heart Association Functional Classification. To be eligible for this trial, patients must be class 2B or better. Patients with acute cardiac events within 6 months prior to registration should be carefully evaluated for their suitability for enrollment * STEP 0: No patients with a history of a severe bleeding disorder or a history of hemorrhagic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage * STEP 0: No patients with known active progressive central nervous system (CNS) disease * STEP 0: No known medical condition causing an inability to swallow oral formulations of agents * STEP 1: The adaptive report confirming a measurable and trackable B cell clone * STEP 1: Patients may not have had major surgery within 7 days of enrollment, or minor surgery within 5 days of enrollment. Examples of minor surgery include dental surgery, insertion of a venous access device, skin biopsy, or aspiration of a joint. The decision about whether a surgery is major or minor can be made at the discretion of the treating physician * STEP 1: No patients with ongoing active fungal, bacterial or viral infection requiring systemic therapy except those described in the protocol document * STEP 1: Patients must not require more than 20 mg prednisone or equivalent corticosteroid daily * STEP 1: Patients must not have uncontrolled active systemic infection requiring intravenous antibiotics * STEP 1: Patients must not have continued requirement for therapy with a strong CYP3A4/5 inhibitor or inducer. Any such inhibitor or inducer must have been discontinued at least 14 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is shorter) before the first dose of study drug * STEP 1: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,000/mm3 unless due to marrow involvement * STEP 1: Platelet count ≥ 30,000/mm3 * STEP 1: Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (unless due to liver involvement, hemolysis or Gilbert's disease) * STEP 1: Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)(serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\])/ alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase \[SGPT\]) ≤ 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN) unless due to disease infiltration of the liver * STEP 1: Calculated (calc.) creatinine clearance by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) ≥ 30 mL/min * STEP 1: Urine protein to creatinine ratio \< 1 or urine protein ≤ 1+ * STEP 2: Detectable MRD ≥ 10 residual clonal cells per million nucleated cells in peripheral blood at the C15 restaging evaluation from ClonoSEQ * STEP 2: Response of PR, PR-L, CR, CCR or CRi to zanubrutinib sonrotoclax therapy

Eligibility in plain statements

This record's criteria have not been broken into separate statements yet. The registry text above is complete and is the authoritative version.

Study design

Study design
Study typeInterventional
PhasePhase 3
AllocationRandomised
Intervention modelPARALLEL
Primary purposeTREATMENT
MaskingNONE (0)
Enrolment466 participants sought

Sponsor and collaborators

  • Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Sponsor
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI) Collaborators

Arms and interventions

  • Arm 1 (zanubrutinib)ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

    Patients receive zanubrutinib PO BID on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo restaging starting at cycle 15 day 1. Patients with at least partial remission continue therapy as described above. Patients with progressive disease proceed to follow up. Patients undergo CT scan, bone marrow aspiration and blood sample collection throughout the study.

  • Arm 2 (zanubrutinib and sonrotoclax)EXPERIMENTAL

    Patients receive zanubrutinib PO BID on days 1-28 of each cycle. Starting cycle 4 day 1 patients also receive sonrotoclax PO QD on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo restaging starting at cycle 15 day 1. Patients with undetectable MRD and a response of PR, PR-L, CR, CCR or CRi stop therapy at cycle 15 day 28 and proceed to follow up. Patients with detectable MRD and an objective response to therapy are re-randomized to arm 2B or arm 2C. ARM 2B: Patients continue zanubrutinib PO BID sonrotoclax PO QD on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for an additonal 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM 2C: Patients discontinue therapy starting at cycle 15 day 28 and proceed to follow up. Patients undergo CT scan, bone marrow aspiration and blood sample collection

Interventions

  • Procedure Biospecimen Collection

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Procedure Bone Marrow Aspiration

    Undergo bone marrow aspiration

  • Procedure Computed Tomography

    Undergo CT scan

  • Drug Sonrotoclax

    Given PO

  • Other Survey Administration

    Ancillary studies

  • Drug Zanubrutinib

    Given PO

Outcome measures

  1. Primary outcome

    Progression free survival (PFS)

    From initial randomization date until the earlier of disease progression or death from any cause. PFS estimates for zanubrutinib plus sonrotoclax therapy to continuous Zanubrutinib.

    Time frame From initial randomization date until the earlier of disease progression or death from any cause, up to 10 years

  2. Other outcome

    PFS for patients with MRD detectable disease treated with fixed duration zanubrutinib sonrotoclax versus patients with MRD detectable disease who receive one additional year of combination therapy

    Undetectable (u) MRD will be defined as \< 10 in 1,000,000 (less than 1 in 10\^-5 \[uMRD5\]) on peripheral blood, and the depth of response below that level, (i.e. down to 10\^-6 \[uMRD6\]), will also be collected. Kaplan-Meier will be used to estimate survival curves, log-rank tests to compare between survival curves, and hazard ration (HRs) and associated 95% CIs will be reported.

    Time frame up to 10 years

  3. Other outcome

    Overall survival

    OS will be summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology, with hazard ratios from a stratified Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank test results provided.

    Time frame Up to 10 years

  4. Other outcome

    Percentage of patients with MRD detectable disease who convert to uMRD after receiving an extra year of combination therapy on the MRD-guided Zanubrutinib sonrotoclax therapy arm

    Proportions of number of MRD+ to uMRD conversion by total number of evaluable patients will be estimated with their corresponding 95% CIs.

    Time frame Up to 10 years

  5. Other outcome

    Overall response rate among treatment arms

    Overall response rate is defined as the highest response achieved during the first 15 cycles of treatment. A response is defined as a patients achieving PR+.

    Time frame Up to 10 years

  6. Other outcome

    Time to next CLL/SLL therapy

    Kaplan-Meier estimates and 95% CIs of TTNT. Time is measured as the time from the end of initial treatment to the initiation of subsequent treatment.

    Time frame Up to 10 years

  7. Other outcome

    Adverse Event Rates and Severity

    Frequency and severity of adverse events and tolerability for each embedded treatment regimen will be collected and summarized using descriptive statistics.

    Time frame Up to 10 years

  8. Other outcome

    Patient-reported symptomatic adverse events

    As assessed by the Patient Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, the frequency and proportion of patients with a maximum baseline-adjusted composite score greater than 0 will be compared between arms using Fisher's exact test. Similarly, the frequency and proportion of patients with a maximum baseline-adjusted composite score greater than or equal to 3 will be compared between arms using Fisher's exact test.

    Time frame Up to 10 years

Dates

Dates
Start dateApril 30, 2026 (actual)
Primary completionSeptember 30, 2028 (estimated)
CompletionSeptember 30, 2038 (estimated)
First postedJanuary 7, 2026 (actual)
Last updatedSeptember 2, 2026
Results postedNot stated in the registry record
Status last verifiedSeptember 2026

Actual means the event happened. Estimated means the sponsor expects it. The two mean different things.

Locations

206 sites are recruiting

United States

United States
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Avera Cancer Institute-AberdeenAberdeenSouth DakotaRecruiting
Hendrick Medical CenterAbileneTexasRecruiting
Mary Greeley Medical CenterAmesIowaRecruiting
McFarland Clinic - AmesAmesIowaRecruiting
Community Hospital of AnacondaAnacondaMontanaRecruiting
Kaiser Permanente-AnaheimAnaheimCaliforniaRecruiting
UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - Ankeny ClinicAnkenyIowaRecruiting
Duluth Clinic AshlandAshlandWisconsinRecruiting
OhioHealth O'Bleness HospitalAthensOhioRecruiting
Saint Alphonsus Cancer Care Center-Baker CityBaker CityOregonRecruiting
Kaiser Permanente-Baldwin ParkBaldwin ParkCaliforniaRecruiting
Kaiser Permanente-BellflowerBellflowerCaliforniaRecruiting
Sanford Joe Lueken Cancer CenterBemidjiMinnesotaRecruiting
Billings Clinic Cancer CenterBillingsMontanaRecruiting
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer CenterBirminghamAlabamaRecruiting
Sanford Bismarck Medical CenterBismarckNorth DakotaRecruiting
Illinois CancerCare-BloomingtonBloomingtonIllinoisRecruiting
Saint Alphonsus Cancer Care Center-BoiseBoiseIdahoRecruiting
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMassachusettsRecruiting
Bozeman Health Deaconess HospitalBozemanMontanaRecruiting
Essentia Health Saint Joseph's Medical CenterBrainerdMinnesotaRecruiting
Trinity Health IHA Medical Group Hematology Oncology - BrightonBrightonMichiganRecruiting
Saint Alphonsus Cancer Care Center-CaldwellCaldwellIdahoRecruiting
Trinity Health IHA Medical Group Hematology Oncology - CantonCantonMichiganRecruiting
Illinois CancerCare-CantonCantonIllinoisRecruiting
Saint Francis Medical CenterCape GirardeauMissouriRecruiting
Saint Anthony Regional HospitalCarrollIowaRecruiting
Illinois CancerCare-CarthageCarthageIllinoisRecruiting
Oncology Associates at Mercy Medical CenterCedar RapidsIowaRecruiting
Mercy HospitalCedar RapidsIowaRecruiting
Cancer Center of Kansas - ChanuteChanuteKansasRecruiting
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterChapel HillNorth CarolinaRecruiting
Trinity Health IHA Medical Group Hematology Oncology - Chelsea HospitalChelseaMichiganRecruiting
Jefferson Cherry Hill HospitalCherry HillNew JerseyRecruiting
Northwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisRecruiting
University of IllinoisChicagoIllinoisRecruiting
Siteman Cancer Center at Saint Peters HospitalCity of Saint PetersMissouriRecruiting
UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - West Des Moines ClinicCliveIowaRecruiting
Kootenai Health - Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'AleneIdahoRecruiting
Baptist Memorial Hospital and Cancer Center-ColliervilleColliervilleTennesseeRecruiting
Grant Medical CenterColumbusOhioRecruiting
Riverside Methodist HospitalColumbusOhioRecruiting
Columbus Oncology and Hematology Associates IncColumbusOhioRecruiting
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioRecruiting
Doctors HospitalColumbusOhioRecruiting
Mercy HospitalCoon RapidsMinnesotaRecruiting
UM Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at Coral GablesCoral GablesFloridaRecruiting
UM Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at Coral SpringsCoral SpringsFloridaRecruiting
Siteman Cancer Center at West County HospitalCreve CoeurMissouriRecruiting
Carle at The RiverfrontDanvilleIllinoisRecruiting

160 further sites are listed in the registry record.

Study documents

No documents are linked in this registry record.

Changes over time

  1. September 2, 2026

    Site added

    28 sites added (210 total)

    182210

  2. August 5, 2026

    Site added

    30 sites added (182 total)

    152182