Skip to main content
xMedica

NCT06777368ClinicalTrials.gov

REdo tranScatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Transcatheter aOrtic Valve failuRE

RecruitingTaking participants now, according to the registry record.
Contact this study

In brief

The purpose of this study is to generate clinical evidence on valve safety and performance in subjects treated by redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR).

Observational225 participants sought71 sites1 country

Categories

Registered in 1 registry

One study can be registered in several registries. We show it once and link every record we hold.

Trial information is shown as published by the registry, in its original language.

Interested in this study?

Sign in or create an account to register your interest and follow this study.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2025-01-15; recorded start 2025-02-06
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Not stated: Whether participants are randomly assigned is not stated in the registry recordNo allocation method is recorded
  • Not stated: A comparison group is not stated in the registry recordThe record describes a single study arm
  • Not stated: Whether the study is blinded is not stated in the registry recordNo masking information is recorded
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 19 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Medtronic Cardiovascular)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 1 condition.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourEXPLORATORY

An exploratory-stage design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation0/20

    Allocation not stated in the record

  • Blinding0/20

    Masking not stated in the record

  • Control arm0/15

    No comparator arm stated in the record

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type3/10

    Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 71 sites

  • Data monitoring committee7/7

    A data monitoring committee is in place

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleMEDIUM

A medium-sized study: 225 participants (target), run at 71 sites.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment23/40

    225 participants (target)

  • Site count21/25

    71 sites

  • Country count0/15

    Single country

  • Planned duration8/10

    Planned over about 33 months

  • Sponsor scale4/10

    Medtronic Cardiovascular has led 19 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Summary

The purpose of this study is to generate clinical evidence on valve safety and performance in subjects treated by redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR).

Primary Objectives: * To determine the acute and long-term outcomes of redo TAVR for the treatment of BVF affecting TAVs * To determine the factors which are associated with the acute and long-term outcomes of redo TAVR

Conditions

  • Aortic Stenosis

Eligibility

Eligibility
SexAll
Ages18 Years – 105 Years
Healthy volunteersNo
Sampling methodNON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE

Study population

The study population includes patients with symptomatic heart disease due to BVF affecting TAVs and requiring redo TAVR.

Eligibility as written in the registry

Inclusion Criteria: * BVF of a TAV (either Medtronic or Edwards) requiring redo TAVR Exclusion Criteria: * BVF due solely to paravalvular regurgitation * Active endocarditis * Untreated acute valve thrombosis * Life-expectancy less than 1-year * Subject is less than legal age of consent, legally incompetent, or otherwise vulnerable * Participating in another study that may influence the outcome of this study

Eligibility in plain statements

This record's criteria have not been broken into separate statements yet. The registry text above is complete and is the authoritative version.

Study design

Study design
Study typeObservational
PhaseNot stated in the registry record
AllocationNot stated in the registry record
Intervention modelNot stated in the registry record
Primary purposeNot stated in the registry record
MaskingNot stated in the registry record
Enrolment225 participants sought

Sponsor and collaborators

  • Medtronic Cardiovascular Sponsor

Arms and interventions

  • Medtronic Transcatheter Aortic Valves (TAV) or Edwards Transcatheter Aortic Valves (TAV)

    Subjects will receive either a Medtronic TAV or Edwards TAV

Interventions

  • Device Edwards TAV

    Edwards TAV where commercially available.

  • Device Medtronic TAV

    Medtronic TAV where commercially available

Outcome measures

  1. Primary outcome

    Primary Outcome Measure

    30-day redo TAVR success defined as correct positioning of a single redo prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomic location, intended performance of the valve (mean gradient \<20mmHg, peak velocity \<3 m/s, Doppler velocity index (DVI) ≥0.25, aortic regurgitation (AR) \< moderate), and freedom from all-cause mortality, coronary obstruction, unplanned coronary revascularization, and surgery or intervention related to the device

    Time frame Early (30-days)

  2. Primary outcome

    Primary Outcome Measure

    a composite endpoint of 1-year freedom from all-cause mortality, all stroke, or any re-hospitalization for valve or redo TAVR procedure-related causes

    Time frame Late (1-year)

  3. Secondary outcome

    Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) 3 technical success (at exit from procedure room)

    (VARC) 3 technical success (at exit from procedure room)

    Time frame Time of procedure

  4. Secondary outcome

    VARC 3 30-day device success

    30-day device success

    Time frame 30-Day

  5. Secondary outcome

    VARC 3 30-day early safety

    30-day early safety

    Time frame 30-Day

  6. Secondary outcome

    Peak and mean invasive gradient post-procedure

    Peak and mean invasive gradient will be measured in mmHg

    Time frame Time of procedure

  7. Secondary outcome

    In-hospital clinical outcomes

    Percentage of all participants with all-cause mortality, all stroke, Myocardial infarction (MI), Coronary artery obstruction, Unplanned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG), Bleeding (VARC 3 type 1-4), Major and Minor vascular and access-related complications, Cardiac structural complications, Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) stage 1-4, Endocarditis, and Valve Thrombosis.

    Time frame Treatment up to 7 days (or until patient is discharged from the hospital if later than 7 days)

  8. Secondary outcome

    Clinical outcomes at 30 days, 1-year, and annually thereafter

    All-cause mortality, All stroke, Myocardial infarction (MI), Coronary artery obstruction, Bleeding (VARC 3 type 1-4), Major and Minor vascular and access-related complications, Cardiac structural complications, Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) stage 1-4, Endocarditis, Valve Thrombosis, Any rehospitalization and re-intervention.

    Time frame 30 days, at 1 year, at 2 years, at 3 years, at 4 years, and at 5 years.

  9. Secondary outcome

    Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction (BVD) at the final required follow-up visit

    Intrinsic permanent changes to the prosthetic valve, including wear and tear, leaflet disruption, flail leaflet, leaflet fibrosis and/or calcification, or strut fracture or deformation

    Time frame 5 year

  10. Secondary outcome

    Bioprosthetic Valve Failure (BVF) at the final required follow-up visit

    Any bioprosthetic valve dysfunction associated with clinically expressive criteria (new-onset or worsening symptoms, left ventricle dilation/hypertrophy/dysfunction, or pulmonary hypertension) or irreversible Stage 3 Hemodynamic Valve Deterioration (HVD) or Aortic valve reoperation or re-intervention, or Valve-related death.

    Time frame Through study completion or Up to 5-years

  11. Secondary outcome

    Echocardiographic assessment pre-discharge or at 30 days, 1-year, and annually thereafter

    Left ventricular ejection fraction, mean gradient across aortic valve, effective orifice area, effective orifice area index, patient-prosthesis mismatch, Doppler Velocity Index, total aortic regurgitation, paravalvular aortic regurgitation, and transvalvular aortic regurgitation.

    Time frame After the procedure and prior to discharge from the hospital, at 30 days, at 1 year, at 2 years, at 3 years, at 4 years, and at 5 years.

  12. Secondary outcome

    Evaluate coronary accessibility (e.g., commissural alignment, valve to valve alignment, etc.) based on Computed Tomography (CT) at either pre-discharge or 30 days

    Evaluate coronary accessibility

    Time frame Up to 30 days

  13. Secondary outcome

    New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification at pre-discharge, 30 days, 1-year, and annually thereafter

    New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification

    Time frame After the procedure and prior to discharge from the hospital, at 30 days, at 1 year, at 2 years, at 3 years, at 4 years, and at 5 years.

  14. Secondary outcome

    KCCQ Quality of life (QoL) assessments at 30 days, 1-year, and annually thereafter

    QoL: KCCQ assessment

    Time frame At 30 days, at 1 year, at 2 years, at 3 years, at 4 years, and at 5 years.

  15. Secondary outcome

    EQ5D Quality of life (QoL) assessments at 30 days, 1-year, and annually thereafter

    QoL: EQ5D assessment

    Time frame At 30 days, at 1 year, at 2 years, at 3 years, at 4 years, and at 5 years.

Dates

Dates
Start dateFebruary 6, 2025 (actual)
Primary completionNovember 1, 2027 (estimated)
CompletionNovember 1, 2027 (estimated)
First postedJanuary 15, 2025 (actual)
Last updatedMay 28, 2026
Results postedNot stated in the registry record
Status last verifiedMay 2026

Actual means the event happened. Estimated means the sponsor expects it. The two mean different things.

Locations

71 sites are recruiting

United States

United States
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Lehigh Valley HospitalAllentownPennsylvaniaRecruiting
University of Michigan HealthAnn ArborMichiganRecruiting
Heart Hospital of AustinAustinTexasRecruiting
Ascension Seton Medical Center AustinAustinTexasRecruiting
Medstar Union Memorial HospitalBaltimoreMarylandRecruiting
The Johns Hopkins HospitalBaltimoreMarylandRecruiting
University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaRecruiting
Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsRecruiting
Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsRecruiting
Buffalo General Medical CenterBuffaloNew YorkRecruiting
University of Vermont Medical CenterBurlingtonVermontRecruiting
University of Virginia Medical CenterCharlottesvilleVirginiaRecruiting
The Christ HospitalCincinnatiOhioRecruiting
Morton Plant HospitalClearwaterFloridaRecruiting
University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical CenterClevelandOhioRecruiting
OhioHealth Riverside Methodist HospitalColumbusOhioRecruiting
MercyOne Iowa Heart CenterDes MoinesIowaRecruiting
Henry Ford HospitalDetroitMichiganRecruiting
Inova Fairfax HospitalFalls ChurchVirginiaRecruiting
HealthPark Medical Center, Lee Memorial HealthFort MyersFloridaRecruiting
Parkview HealthFort WayneIndianaRecruiting
Corewell Health (Spectrum)Grand RapidsMichiganRecruiting
Hartford HospitalHartfordConnecticutRecruiting
University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonHoustonTexasRecruiting
Baylor Saint Luke's (The Texas Heart Institute)HoustonTexasRecruiting
Houston Methodist HospitalHoustonTexasRecruiting
Saint Vincent Heart Center of IndianaIndianapolisIndianaRecruiting
University of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa CityIowaRecruiting
St. Luke's Hospital of Kansas CityKansas CityMissouriRecruiting
The University of KansasKansas CityKansasRecruiting
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonNew HampshireRecruiting
Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaRecruiting
Medical Center of the RockiesLovelandColoradoRecruiting
Catholic Medical CenterManchesterNew HampshireRecruiting
Northwell HealthManhassetNew YorkRecruiting
UPMC PinnacleMechanicsburgPennsylvaniaRecruiting
Aurora St. Lukes Medical CenterMilwaukeeWisconsinRecruiting
Froedtert HospitalMilwaukeeWisconsinRecruiting
Abbott Northwestern/Minneapolis HeartMinneapolisMinnesotaRecruiting
Providence Saint Patrick HospitalMissoulaMontanaRecruiting
TriStar Centennial Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeRecruiting
St. Thomas West HospitalNashvilleTennesseeRecruiting
Jersey Shore University Medical CenterNeptune CityNew JerseyRecruiting
Yale New Haven HospitalNew HavenConnecticutRecruiting
NYU Langone Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkRecruiting
Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkRecruiting
Sentara Norfolk General HospitalNorfolkVirginiaRecruiting
Oklahoma Heart HospitalOklahoma CityOklahomaRecruiting
Orlando Health/Orlando Regional Medical CenterOrlandoFloridaRecruiting
The Valley HospitalParamusNew JerseyRecruiting

21 further sites are listed in the registry record.

Study documents

No documents are linked in this registry record.

Changes over time

No changes have been recorded since we first ingested this record.

A change is recorded each time the sponsor updates the registry record. Status, dates, enrolment and sites appear here as they move.