Zum Hauptinhalt springen
xMedica

NCT07090161ClinicalTrials.gov

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Iloperidone for the Treatment of Participants With Uncontrolled Hypertension

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Iloperidone for the Treatment of Participants With Uncontrolled Hypertension

RekrutiertNimmt laut Registereintrag derzeit Teilnehmende auf.
Diese Studie kontaktieren

Kurz gefasst

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Iloperidone for the Treatment of Participants with Uncontrolled Hypertension

Phase 2240 Teilnehmende gesucht28 Studienzentren1 Land

Kategorien

In 1 Register registriert

Eine Studie kann in mehreren Registern registriert sein. Wir zeigen sie einmal und verlinken jeden Eintrag, den wir haben.

Die Studieninformationen werden so angezeigt, wie sie vom Register veröffentlicht wurden, in ihrer Originalsprache.

Interesse an dieser Studie?

Anmelden oder ein Konto erstellen um Ihr Interesse zu bekunden und diese Studie zu verfolgen.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2025-07-29; recorded start 2025-09-15
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
  • Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
  • Present: Uses blinding (masking)A masking level is recorded in the record
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 28 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Vanda Pharmaceuticals)
  • Not stated: No posted results from this sponsor are in this database yetBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 2 conditions.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
  • Intervention regulatory context: investigational, within a phased regulatory pathway.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourDEFINITIVE

A definitive-grade design for a phase 2 study, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation20/20

    Participants are randomly allocated between arms

  • Blinding20/20

    Quadruple-blind

  • Control arm13/15

    Placebo / sham control arm

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type3/10

    Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 28 sites

  • Data monitoring committee7/7

    A data monitoring committee is in place

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleMEDIUM

A medium-sized study: 240 participants (target), run at 28 sites.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment23/40

    240 participants (target)

  • Site count17/25

    28 sites

  • Country count0/15

    Single country

  • Planned duration5/10

    Planned over about 14 months

  • Sponsor scale5/10

    Vanda Pharmaceuticals has led 29 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Zusammenfassung

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Iloperidone for the Treatment of Participants with Uncontrolled Hypertension

Erkrankungen

  • Hypertension
  • Uncontrolled Hypertension

Eignung

Eignung
GeschlechtAlle
Alter18 Years65 Years
Gesunde FreiwilligeNein

Eignung im Wortlaut des Registers

Inclusion Criteria: * SiSBP \>/= 130 mmHg despite \>8 weeks treatment w/ 1 or more antihypertensive therapies Exclusion Criteria: * Confirmed Grade 3/severe hypertension (SiSBP \>/= 180 mmHg, SiDBP \>/= 120 mmHg), unstable cardiac disease, renal insufficiency

Eignung in einfachen Aussagen

Die Kriterien dieses Eintrags wurden noch nicht in einzelne Aussagen aufgeschlüsselt. Der Registertext oben ist vollständig und ist die maßgebliche Fassung.

Studiendesign

Studiendesign
StudientypInterventionell
PhasePhase 2
ZuteilungRandomisiert
InterventionsmodellPARALLEL
Primäres ZielTREATMENT
VerblindungQUADRUPLE (4)
Teilnahme240 Teilnehmende gesucht

Sponsor und Mitwirkende

  • Vanda Pharmaceuticals Sponsor

Studienarme und Interventionen

  • Experimental/IloperidoneEXPERIMENTAL
  • Placebo ComparatorPLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Interventionen

  • Arzneimittel Placebo

    placebo comparator

  • Arzneimittel iloperidone

    iloperidone

Endpunkte

  1. Primärer Endpunkt

    Change from baseline to treatment week 4 in SiSBP

    Zeitrahmen screening to treatment week 4

Daten

Daten
Startdatum15. September 2025 (tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss1. Oktober 2026 (geschätzt)
Abschluss1. November 2026 (geschätzt)
Erstveröffentlichung29. Juli 2025 (tatsächlich)
Zuletzt aktualisiert27. Februar 2026
Ergebnisse veröffentlichtIm Registereintrag nicht angegeben
Status zuletzt bestätigtJanuar 2026

Tatsächlich bedeutet, dass das Ereignis eingetreten ist. Geschätzt bedeutet, dass der Sponsor es erwartet. Die beiden bedeuten Unterschiedliches.

Standorte

18 Studienzentren rekrutieren

United States

United States
EinrichtungStadtBundesland oder RegionStatus
Vanda Investigative SiteBurkeVirginiaRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteCarrolltonTexasRekrutierung noch nicht begonnen
Vanda Investigative SiteCharlestonSouth CarolinaRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteChula VistaCaliforniaRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteCincinnatiOhioRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteColumbusGeorgiaRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteDoralFloridaRekrutierung noch nicht begonnen
Vanda Investigative SiteDublinCaliforniaRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteEl DoradoKansasRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteFort MyersFloridaRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteHazelwoodMissouriRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteKinstonNorth CarolinaRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteLas VegasNevadaRekrutierung noch nicht begonnen
Vanda Investigative SiteLexingtonKentuckyRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteMount KiscoNew YorkRekrutierung noch nicht begonnen
Vanda Investigative SiteNorfolkVirginiaRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteNormanOklahomaRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteOak BrookIllinoisRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteOklahoma CityOklahomaRekrutierung noch nicht begonnen
Vanda Investigative SitePhoenixArizonaRekrutierung noch nicht begonnen
Vanda Investigative SiteRochesterNew YorkRekrutierung noch nicht begonnen
Vanda Investigative SiteSalt Lake CityUtahRekrutierung noch nicht begonnen
Vanda Investigative SiteTempeArizonaRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteTinley ParkIllinoisRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteTucsonArizonaRekrutierung noch nicht begonnen
Vanda Investigative SiteValenciaCaliforniaRekrutierung noch nicht begonnen
Vanda Investigative SiteWalnut CreekCaliforniaRekrutiert
Vanda Investigative SiteWichitaKansasRekrutiert

Studiendokumente

In diesem Registereintrag sind keine Dokumente verlinkt.

Änderungen im Zeitverlauf

Seit wir diesen Eintrag erstmals eingelesen haben, wurden keine Änderungen erfasst.

Eine Änderung wird jedes Mal erfasst, wenn der Sponsor den Registereintrag aktualisiert. Status, Daten, Teilnahme und Studienzentren erscheinen hier, sobald sie sich ändern.